Interpreting the semantics of GD&T specifications of a product for tolerance analysis

被引:43
|
作者
Sarigecili, Mehmet I. [1 ]
Roy, Utpal [1 ]
Rachuri, Sudarsan [2 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Syst Integrat Div, Engn Lab, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
关键词
Product modeling; STEP; EXPRESS; OWL; Semantic; GD&T; Tolerance analysis; DESIGN; INTEGRATION; INFORMATION; ONTOLOGY; FUTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cad.2013.09.002
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The representation and management of product information in its life cycle require standardized data exchange protocols. ISO 10303, informally known as the Standard for Exchange of Product model data (STEP), is such a standard that has been used widely by the industries. The information language used for STEP is EXPRESS. Even though the EXPRESS language is capable of developing well defined and syntactically correct product models, the semantics of product data are represented implicitly. Hence, it is difficult to interpret the semantics of data for different product life cycle phases for different application domains. OntoSTEP, developed at NIST, provides semantically enriched product models in OWL In this paper, we would like to present how to interpret the Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) specifications in STEP for tolerance analysis by utilizing OntoSTEP. This process requires (1) developing the tolerance-analysis-oriented information model in EXPRESS, (2) combining this model with the ISO 10303 product model, (3) translating the combined model into OWL and (4) defining semantic web rule language to map the GD&T specifications to the specifications needed for the tolerance analysis. This study will help users interpret the GD&T specifications of a product differently as required in different phases of the product's life cycle. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 84
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tolerance analysis of a product coupling geometric and architectural specifications in a probabilistic approach
    Yann Ledoux
    Denis Teissandier
    Research in Engineering Design, 2013, 24 : 297 - 311
  • [32] Tolerance analysis of a product coupling geometric and architectural specifications in a probabilistic approach
    Ledoux, Yann
    Teissandier, Denis
    RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2013, 24 (03) : 297 - 311
  • [33] GD&T图纸的智能化设计技术
    周世玉
    王俊杰
    余敦丽
    企业科技与发展, 2022, (12) : 41 - 43
  • [34] GD&T图纸的智能化设计技术
    王俊杰
    刘文丽
    余敦丽
    企业科技与发展, 2022, (11) : 52 - 54
  • [35] GD&T中的三种装配设计
    王廷强
    金属加工(冷加工), 2014, (23) : 45 - 47
  • [36] Integrating GD&T into dimensional variation models for multistage machining processes
    Loose, Jean-Philippe
    Zhou, Qiang
    Zhou, Shiyu
    Ceglarek, Darek
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (11) : 3129 - 3149
  • [37] Fundamental concepts on the use of a basic dimension: Positional tolerancing, GD&T
    Gay, GS
    ASQ'S 54TH ANNUAL QUALITY CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 6 - 9
  • [38] Framework for Automated GD&T Inspection Using 3D Scanner
    Pathak V.K.
    Singh A.K.
    Sivadasan M.
    Singh N.K.
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2018, 99 (2) : 197 - 205
  • [39] Using geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) to define parts in electrical manufacture
    Jetley, SK
    Waggoner, TC
    PROCEEDINGS: ELECTRICAL INSULATION CONFERENCE AND ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING & COIL WINDING TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, 2003, : 69 - 74
  • [40] PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION ON GENERATING AN EXPLICIT GD&T SCHEME FROM A PROCESS PLAN
    Haghighi, Payam
    Vemulapalli, Prabath
    Mohan, Prashant
    Shah, Jami J.
    Davidson, Joseph K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2013, VOL 4, 2014,