Interpreting the semantics of GD&T specifications of a product for tolerance analysis

被引:43
|
作者
Sarigecili, Mehmet I. [1 ]
Roy, Utpal [1 ]
Rachuri, Sudarsan [2 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Syst Integrat Div, Engn Lab, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
关键词
Product modeling; STEP; EXPRESS; OWL; Semantic; GD&T; Tolerance analysis; DESIGN; INTEGRATION; INFORMATION; ONTOLOGY; FUTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cad.2013.09.002
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The representation and management of product information in its life cycle require standardized data exchange protocols. ISO 10303, informally known as the Standard for Exchange of Product model data (STEP), is such a standard that has been used widely by the industries. The information language used for STEP is EXPRESS. Even though the EXPRESS language is capable of developing well defined and syntactically correct product models, the semantics of product data are represented implicitly. Hence, it is difficult to interpret the semantics of data for different product life cycle phases for different application domains. OntoSTEP, developed at NIST, provides semantically enriched product models in OWL In this paper, we would like to present how to interpret the Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) specifications in STEP for tolerance analysis by utilizing OntoSTEP. This process requires (1) developing the tolerance-analysis-oriented information model in EXPRESS, (2) combining this model with the ISO 10303 product model, (3) translating the combined model into OWL and (4) defining semantic web rule language to map the GD&T specifications to the specifications needed for the tolerance analysis. This study will help users interpret the GD&T specifications of a product differently as required in different phases of the product's life cycle. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 84
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Toward Automatic Tolerancing of Mechanical Assemblies: First-Order GD&T Schema Development and Tolerance Allocation
    Haghighi, Payam
    Mohan, Prashant
    Kalish, Nathan
    Vemulapalli, Prabath
    Shah, Jami J.
    Davidson, Joseph K.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 15 (04)
  • [22] Model-Based Approach for Optimal Allocation of GD&T
    Petruccioli, Andrea
    Pini, Fabio
    Leali, Francesco
    DESIGN TOOLS AND METHODS IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING II, ADM 2021, 2022, : 277 - 284
  • [23] Mapping of GD&T information and PMI between 3D product models in the STEP and STL format
    Hallmann, Martin
    Goetz, Stefan
    Schleich, Benjamin
    COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 2019, 115 : 293 - 306
  • [24] 浅析汽车钣金件GD&T公差设计方法
    何亮
    时代农机, 2018, 45 (09) : 247 - 247
  • [25] LINKING CAD AND METROLOGY TO EXPLAIN, DEMONSTRATE, AND TEACH GD&T
    Hewerdine, Kyle Patrick
    Leake, James M.
    Hall, Emeritus W. Brent
    2011 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION, 2011,
  • [26] Interlaboratory Empirical Reproducibility Study Based on a GD&T Benchmark
    Aidibe, Ali
    Tahan, Souheil Antoine
    Nejad, Mojtaba Kamali
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (14):
  • [27] 蔡司GD&T数字坐标测量案例分享
    费丽娜
    金属加工(冷加工), 2013, (22) : 28 - 29
  • [28] Independence of metrological operations: the relevance of datum systems in GD&T
    Mourao, Antonio
    Fradinho, Joao
    Gabriel-Santos, Antonio
    Cavique, Miguel
    29TH CIRP DESIGN CONFERENCE 2019, 2019, 84 : 307 - 310
  • [29] An Efficient Approach to Interpreting Rigorous Tolerance Semantics for Complicated Tolerance Specification
    Liu, Yusheng
    Gao, Shuming
    Cao, Yaolong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 6 (04) : 670 - 684
  • [30] GD&T made simple: All you need is profile and position
    Roth, ES
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (05): : 16 - 16