Interpreting the semantics of GD&T specifications of a product for tolerance analysis

被引:43
|
作者
Sarigecili, Mehmet I. [1 ]
Roy, Utpal [1 ]
Rachuri, Sudarsan [2 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Syst Integrat Div, Engn Lab, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
关键词
Product modeling; STEP; EXPRESS; OWL; Semantic; GD&T; Tolerance analysis; DESIGN; INTEGRATION; INFORMATION; ONTOLOGY; FUTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.cad.2013.09.002
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The representation and management of product information in its life cycle require standardized data exchange protocols. ISO 10303, informally known as the Standard for Exchange of Product model data (STEP), is such a standard that has been used widely by the industries. The information language used for STEP is EXPRESS. Even though the EXPRESS language is capable of developing well defined and syntactically correct product models, the semantics of product data are represented implicitly. Hence, it is difficult to interpret the semantics of data for different product life cycle phases for different application domains. OntoSTEP, developed at NIST, provides semantically enriched product models in OWL In this paper, we would like to present how to interpret the Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) specifications in STEP for tolerance analysis by utilizing OntoSTEP. This process requires (1) developing the tolerance-analysis-oriented information model in EXPRESS, (2) combining this model with the ISO 10303 product model, (3) translating the combined model into OWL and (4) defining semantic web rule language to map the GD&T specifications to the specifications needed for the tolerance analysis. This study will help users interpret the GD&T specifications of a product differently as required in different phases of the product's life cycle. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 84
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PROCESS CAPABILITY ANALYSIS WITH GD&T SPECIFICATIONS
    Liu, Jinya
    Huang, Wenzhen
    Kong, Zhenyu
    Zhou, Yingqing
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2013, VOL 2A, 2014,
  • [2] Importance of following GD&T specifications
    Variation Systems Analysis, St. Clair Shores, United States
    Qual Prog, 2 (95-98):
  • [3] Interpreting the Language of GD&T in Metrology
    Morey, Bruce
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2014, 153 (03): : 105 - +
  • [4] TOLERANCE SPECIFICATION MODEL FOR SYSTEMATIC APPLICATION OF GD&T IN PRODUCT DESIGN
    Petruccioli, Andrea
    Pini, Fabio
    Leali, Francesco
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2021 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (IMECE2021), VOL 6, 2021,
  • [5] Update on GD&T
    Neumann, AG
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 1995, 115 (04): : 47 - &
  • [6] The GD&T trainer
    Kubiak, TM
    QUALITY PROGRESS, 1999, 32 (12) : 93 - 94
  • [7] Analysis neutral data structure for GD&T
    Zhengshu Shen
    Jami J. Shah
    Joseph K. Davidson
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2008, 19 : 455 - 472
  • [8] Analysis neutral data structure for GD&T
    Shen, Zhengshu
    Shah, Jami J.
    Davidson, Joseph K.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2008, 19 (04) : 455 - 472
  • [9] The "GD&T Knowledge Gap" in industry
    Watts, Dean
    DETC2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 4, 2008, : 597 - 604
  • [10] It's GD&T, not design for manufacturing
    Tonk, HS
    QUALITY PROGRESS, 2002, 35 (02) : 8 - 8