Comparison and Analysis of Identification of soil stratigraphy in Shanghai between CPTU Test and Laboratory Test

被引：0

作者：

Wang, Junpeng ^{[1
]}

Wu, Yongnan ^{[1
]}

Liu, Yao ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Qingdao Technol Univ, Coll Management, 2 Changjiang Rd, Qingdao 266520, Peoples R China

[2] Zhongqi Jiaojian Grp Co Ltd, Qingdao, Peoples R China

[3] Zhongqi Jiaojian Grp Co Ltd, Engn, Qingdao, Peoples R China

来源：

PROGRESS IN INDUSTRIAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, PTS. 1-5 | 2012年 / 204-208卷

关键词：

soft deposit; stratigraphy; CPTU test; laboratory test; Robertson charts (1990);

D O I：

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.204-208.732

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

This article presents a comparison and analysis between piezocone penetration test (CPTU) and laboratory test in identifying soil stratigraphy of Shanghai. In China, stratigraphy for soft deposit is mainly obtained from plasticity index and grain size distribution of borehole samples in the laboratory (refer to code method). Identification of soil stratigraphy with CPTU was developed and improved in recent decades. The analysis is carried out with the field data at test site of Yan'an Road Tunnel in Shanghai. The stratigraphy charts proposed by Robertson in 1990 (refer to Robertson charts (1990)) are used to identify soil strata. The results are comparison with that from the code method. The results show that Robertson charts (1990) can be suitable to identify the stratigraphy of soft deposit of Shanghai. Moreover, the discussion on discrepancies between them is also conducted.

引用

页码：732 / 737

页数：6

共 50 条

[31] Test-Retest Reliability of the San Diego Odor Identification Test and Comparison with the Brief Smell Identification Test
Krantz, Elizabeth M.
Schubert, C. R.
Dalton, D. S.
Zhong, W.
Huang, G. H.
Klein, B. E. K.
Klein, R.
Nieto, F. J.
Cruickshanks, K. J.
CHEMICAL SENSES, 2009, 34 (05) : 435 - 440
[32] Inter-laboratory comparison of a fatigue test
Holmgren, M
Johansson, K
Johnson, E
Svensson, T
MATERIALPRUFUNG, 2005, 47 (09): : 529 - 533
[33] LABORATORY TEST RIG FOR STUDYING THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE ACTIVE PARTS OF THE AGRICULTURAL UNITS AND SOIL
Tenu, Ioan
Cojocariu, Petru
Rosca, Radu
Carlescu, Petru
AKTUALNI ZADACI MEHANIZACIJE POLJOPRIVREDE, 2012, 40 : 223 - 230
[34] Comparison of a simulated 'in-service' rig test with a standardised laboratory abrasion test
Whittaker, LV
Matthews, A
SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 177 : 603 - 610
[35] Comparison of the shear test results of a cable bolt on three laboratory test apparatuses
Li, Xuwei
Aziz, Naj
Mirzaghorbanali, Ali
Nemcik, Jan
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 61 : 82 - 89
[36] Reliability Analysis on English Writing Test of SHSEE in Shanghai
黄玉麒
黄芳
海外英语, 2014, (21) : 91 - 92
[37] LABORATORY FOOTING TEST ON PARTIALLY SATURATED SANDY SOIL
Nyuin, J. D.
Noor, M. J. Md
Ashaari, Y.
Petrus, C.
Albar, A.
JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2016, 78 (5-5): : 57 - 61
[38] THE NEGLECTED LABORATORY TEST - THE SEMEN ANALYSIS
CHONG, AP
WALTERS, CA
WEINRIEB, SA
JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 1983, 4 (04): : 280 - 282
[39] Putting it to the test - polymer analysis in the laboratory
Markarian, Jennifer
Plastics, Additives and Compounding, 2007, 9 (03) : 22 - 25
[40] COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WEBERS TEST AND THE TEST OF WHOLE DISCRIMINATIVE SENSIBILITY
LAMBILLIOTTE, P
VILAIN, R
ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1978, 32 (09): : 601 - 604

← 1 2 3 4 5 →