Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface

被引:50
|
作者
Venezia, Pietro
Torsello, Ferruccio [1 ]
Cavalcanti, Raffaele
D'Amato, Salvatore [2 ]
机构
[1] Eastman Dent Hosp, Dept Periodont & Prosthodont, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Naples 2, Multidisciplinary Dept Med & Dent, Unit Maxillofacial Surg, Naples, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2015年 / 114卷 / 04期
关键词
FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; LEAST; 5; YEARS; COMPLICATION RATES; CLINICAL REPORT; BOND STRENGTH; SURVIVAL; CEMENT; RECONSTRUCTIONS; METAL; FRAMEWORKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Monolithic zirconia prostheses on teeth or implants have been proposed in recent years as a potential treatment. To date, limited data regarding the outcomes of these prostheses have been presented and are mainly based on limited sample size and short-term follow-up. Data on complete-arch monolithic zirconia prostheses are relatively scarce. Purpose. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical performances of 26 implant-supported, complete-arch, monolithic zirconia restorations with facial feldspathic porcelain veneers for the rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients. Material and methods. All patients' charts from 2 private practices from 2010 to 2013 were reviewed. Patients rehabilitated with a complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses were included in the study. Several parameters were recorded so as to evaluate the outcome of these rehabilitations: implant survival and success rates, prosthesis survival rate, interproximal bone loss, periimplant probing depth, and bleeding on probing. The number and type of prosthetic complications were also recorded. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results. Eighteen patients were treated with a total of 26 complete-arch fixed prostheses. The mean follow-up time was 20.9 months (SD 13.6; range, 10 to 36 months). In total, 154 implants were placed supporting 309 retainers and pontics. The implant survival rate was 100% and the success rate was 94.8%. Mean bone loss was 0.66 mm (SD 0.59 mm). Mean probing depth was 3.4 mm (SD 0.92 mm). Bleeding on probing was positive in 19% of probing sites. The prosthesis survival rate was 100%. Conclusions. The results of this retrospective evaluation showed that monolithic zirconia restorations with facial porcelain veneer provided satisfactory clinical performance and suggest that these rehabilitations are a viable treatment option for completely edentulous patients.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 512
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Titanium versus zirconia complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A comparison of plaque accumulation
    Curiel-Aguilera, Francisco P.
    Grif, Garth R.
    Rossmann, Jeffrey A.
    Gonzalez, Jorge A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (03): : 369 - 375
  • [22] Full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: An updated systematic review
    AlTarawneh, Sandra
    Thalji, Ghadeer
    Cooper, Lyndon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 14 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [23] Clinician preferences for complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: A survey of the membership of the Pacific Coast Society for Prosthodontics
    Schoenbaum, Todd R.
    Guichet, David L.
    Jang, Jae Y.
    Kim, Young K.
    Wadhwani, Chandur P. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (06): : 699 - 705
  • [24] Full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: A prospective study comparing porcelain-veneered zirconia frameworks to monolithic zirconia
    Carames, Joao
    Marques, Duarte
    Barbosa, Joao Malta
    Moreira, Andre
    Crispim, Pedro
    Chen, Andre
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (01) : 68 - 78
  • [25] Fracture load of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with nylon-silica mesh: An in vitro study
    Papaiz Goncalves, Fernanda de Cassia
    Amaral, Marina
    Souto Borges, Alexandre Luiz
    Martins Goncalves, Luiz Fernando
    de Arruda Paes-Junior, Tarcisio Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 119 (04): : 606 - 610
  • [26] Factors influencing speech improvement following maxillary complete-arch implant-supported restorations: A retrospective study
    Zhang, Yun
    Ding, Hongwei
    Gao, Hanqi
    Liu, Jie
    Wang, Feng
    Wu, Yiqun
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [27] Comparison of the Surface Roughness of CAD/CAM Metal-Free Materials Used for Complete-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study
    Mory, Nataly
    Cascos, Rocio
    Celemin-Vinuela, Alicia
    Gomez-Polo, Cristina
    Agustin-Panadero, Ruben
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    [J]. BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (11)
  • [28] Effect of different implant configurations on biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported mandibular monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses
    Zhong, Jingxiao
    Guazzato, Massimiliano
    Chen, Junning
    Zhang, Zhongpu
    Sun, Guangyong
    Huo, Xintao
    Liu, Xinglong
    Ahmad, Rohana
    Li, Qing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2020, 102
  • [29] Effect of different implant configurations on biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported mandibular monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses
    Zhong, Jingxiao
    Guazzato, Massimiliano
    Chen, Junning
    Zhang, Zhongpu
    Sun, Guangyong
    Huo, Xintao
    Liu, Xinglong
    Ahmad, Rohana
    Li, Qing
    [J]. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2020, 102
  • [30] Effect of Cantilever Extension on Bone Loss in Mandibular Complete-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses with Three and Four Implants
    Larisse, Ana
    Pereira, Carneiro
    Torres, Ana Clara Soares Paiva
    Campos, Maria de Fatima Trindade Pinto
    Melo, Laercio Almeida de
    Dantas, Euler Maciel
    Barbosa, Gustavo Augusto Seabra
    Carreiro, Adriana da Fonte Porto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2024, 37 (03) : 271 - 281