The staging pelvic lymphadenectomy: Implications as an adjunctive procedure for clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Alagiri, M [1 ]
Colton, MD [1 ]
Seidmon, EJ [1 ]
Greenberg, RE [1 ]
Hanno, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] TEMPLE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT UROL,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19122
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1997年 / 80卷 / 02期
关键词
prostate cancer; nodal metastases; laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00233.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the utility of staging pelvic lymphadenectomy and to identify factors associated with nodal metastases in which a node dissection would be of clinical benefit. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis (1989-1993) was performed on 303 consecutive patients who underwent staging bilateral modified pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate age, race, clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score for predicting nodal metastases. Results Twenty-eight patients had nodal metastases, giving an overall prevalence of 9.2%. PSA and Gleason score (both P<0.001) were significantly predictive of nodal involvement when combined or as independent variables. Relative to PSA and Gleason score, the patients' age, race and clinical stage were less relevant. Sensitivity analysis determined that combining a PSA of greater than or equal to 20 ng/mL (normal 0-4) and a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 8 gave a negative predictive value of 92% with a specificity of 99%, a positive predictive value of 67% and an overall accuracy of 91% for predicting nodal metastases. Conclusion From this data, lymph node metastases are unlikely in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who have a PSA of < 20 ng/mL and a Gleason score <8, and that a pelvic lymph node dissection as an adjunctive procedure should be avoided in such individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 246
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Phased array magnetic resonance imaging for staging clinically localized prostate cancer
    Borre, M
    Lundorf, E
    Marcussen, N
    Langkilde, NC
    Wolf, H
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2005, 44 (06) : 589 - 592
  • [42] Outcome based staging for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate
    DAmico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Schultz, D
    Malkowicz, B
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Wein, A
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (04): : 1422 - 1426
  • [43] SIGNIFICANCE OF STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR PROSTATIC-CANCER
    FUJIOKA, T
    KOIKE, H
    AOKI, H
    OHHORI, T
    CHIBA, R
    OKAMOTO, S
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1987, 42 (05) : 380 - 384
  • [44] Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer: Counting Lymph Nodes or Dissecting Primary Landing Zones of the Prostate?
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Pfister, David
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (03) : 447 - 449
  • [45] RESULTS OF PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PROSTATE-CANCER
    POLLEN, JJ
    UROLOGY, 1983, 21 (04) : 435 - 436
  • [46] Pros and cons of pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer
    Heidenreich, A
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2004, 35 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [47] The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer - Therapeutic?
    Wagner, M.
    Sokoloff, M.
    Daneshmand, S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (02): : 408 - 413
  • [48] Role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer management
    Sivalingam, S.
    Oxley, J.
    Probert, J. L.
    Stolzenburg, J. U.
    Schwalbold, H.
    UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (02) : 203 - 209
  • [49] The use of percent free prostate specific antigen for staging of men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Subong, E
    Pannek, J
    Chan, DW
    Epstein, JI
    Walsh, PC
    Partin, AW
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 294 - 294
  • [50] Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer
    Briganti, Alberto
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Salonia, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Gallina, Andrea
    Da Pozzo, Luigi Filippo
    Roscigno, Marco
    Zanni, Giuseppe
    Valiquette, Luc
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (05) : 1006 - 1013