The staging pelvic lymphadenectomy: Implications as an adjunctive procedure for clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Alagiri, M [1 ]
Colton, MD [1 ]
Seidmon, EJ [1 ]
Greenberg, RE [1 ]
Hanno, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] TEMPLE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT UROL,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19122
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1997年 / 80卷 / 02期
关键词
prostate cancer; nodal metastases; laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00233.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the utility of staging pelvic lymphadenectomy and to identify factors associated with nodal metastases in which a node dissection would be of clinical benefit. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis (1989-1993) was performed on 303 consecutive patients who underwent staging bilateral modified pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate age, race, clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score for predicting nodal metastases. Results Twenty-eight patients had nodal metastases, giving an overall prevalence of 9.2%. PSA and Gleason score (both P<0.001) were significantly predictive of nodal involvement when combined or as independent variables. Relative to PSA and Gleason score, the patients' age, race and clinical stage were less relevant. Sensitivity analysis determined that combining a PSA of greater than or equal to 20 ng/mL (normal 0-4) and a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 8 gave a negative predictive value of 92% with a specificity of 99%, a positive predictive value of 67% and an overall accuracy of 91% for predicting nodal metastases. Conclusion From this data, lymph node metastases are unlikely in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who have a PSA of < 20 ng/mL and a Gleason score <8, and that a pelvic lymph node dissection as an adjunctive procedure should be avoided in such individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 246
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The use of percent free prostate specific antigen for staging clinically localized prostate cancer
    Pannek, J
    Rittenhouse, HG
    Chan, DW
    Epstein, JI
    Walsh, PC
    Partin, AW
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (04): : 1238 - 1242
  • [32] Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer
    Briganti, Alberto
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Salonia, Andrea
    Gallina, Andrea
    Farina, Elena
    Da Pozzo, Luigi F.
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 98 (04) : 788 - 793
  • [33] Evaluation of staging lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer
    El-Galley, RES
    Keane, TE
    Petros, JA
    Sanders, WH
    Clarke, HS
    Cotsonis, GA
    Graham, SD
    UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (04) : 663 - 667
  • [34] Povidone-iodine instillation for management of pelvic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy for staging prostate cancer
    Sun, GH
    Fu, YT
    Wu, CJ
    Chang, SY
    ARCHIVES OF ANDROLOGY, 2003, 49 (06): : 463 - 466
  • [35] Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer
    Link, RE
    Morton, RA
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (03) : 491 - +
  • [36] A new minimally invasive open pelvic lymphadenectomy surgical technique for the staging of prostate cancer
    Brant, LA
    Brant, WO
    Brown, MH
    Seid, DL
    Allen, RE
    UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (03) : 416 - 421
  • [37] Pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer treatment
    Reljic, Ante
    Justinic, Danijel
    Stimac, Goran
    Spajic, Borislav
    Kraus, Ognjen
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2007, 46 (01) : 49 - 53
  • [38] Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localised prostate cancer: A prospective observational study
    Ramos, J. G.
    Caicedo, J. I.
    Catano, J. G.
    Villarraga, L. G.
    Trujillo, C. G.
    Robledo, D.
    Plata, M.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2016, 40 (07): : 446 - 452
  • [39] STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - REVIEW OF 91 CASES
    GROSSMAN, IC
    CARPINIELLO, V
    GREENBERG, SH
    MALLOY, TR
    WEIN, AJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 124 (05): : 632 - 634
  • [40] STAGING PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - RISK VERSUS BENEFIT
    BRENDLER, CB
    CLEEVE, LK
    ANDERSON, EE
    PAULSON, DF
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 124 (06): : 849 - 850