The staging pelvic lymphadenectomy: Implications as an adjunctive procedure for clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:17
|
作者
Alagiri, M [1 ]
Colton, MD [1 ]
Seidmon, EJ [1 ]
Greenberg, RE [1 ]
Hanno, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] TEMPLE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT UROL,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19122
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1997年 / 80卷 / 02期
关键词
prostate cancer; nodal metastases; laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00233.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the utility of staging pelvic lymphadenectomy and to identify factors associated with nodal metastases in which a node dissection would be of clinical benefit. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis (1989-1993) was performed on 303 consecutive patients who underwent staging bilateral modified pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate age, race, clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score for predicting nodal metastases. Results Twenty-eight patients had nodal metastases, giving an overall prevalence of 9.2%. PSA and Gleason score (both P<0.001) were significantly predictive of nodal involvement when combined or as independent variables. Relative to PSA and Gleason score, the patients' age, race and clinical stage were less relevant. Sensitivity analysis determined that combining a PSA of greater than or equal to 20 ng/mL (normal 0-4) and a Gleason score of greater than or equal to 8 gave a negative predictive value of 92% with a specificity of 99%, a positive predictive value of 67% and an overall accuracy of 91% for predicting nodal metastases. Conclusion From this data, lymph node metastases are unlikely in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who have a PSA of < 20 ng/mL and a Gleason score <8, and that a pelvic lymph node dissection as an adjunctive procedure should be avoided in such individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 246
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer
    Peneau, M
    Villers, A
    Molinie, V
    Theis, D
    Soulie, M
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2004, 14 (03): : 287 - 294
  • [2] PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR STAGING CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER - INDICATIONS, COMPLICATIONS, AND RESULTS IN 217 CASES
    MCDOWELL, GC
    JOHNSON, JW
    TENNEY, DM
    JOHNSON, DE
    UROLOGY, 1990, 35 (06) : 476 - 482
  • [3] PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR STAGING LOCALIZED PROSTATIC CANCER
    DAHL, DS
    WILSON, CS
    MIDDLETON, RG
    BOURNE, HH
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 112 (02): : 245 - 246
  • [4] Standard versus extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in the patients with clinically localized prostate cancer
    Bogdanovic, Jovo
    Sekulic, Vuk
    Trivunic-Dajko, Sandra
    Herin, Ranko
    Djozic, Senjin
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2019, 76 (09) : 929 - 934
  • [5] Staging laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer
    Shackley, DC
    Irving, SO
    Brough, WA
    O'Reilly, PH
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 83 (03) : 260 - 264
  • [6] PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR STAGING OF APPARENTLY LOCALIZED PROSTATIC CANCER
    WILSON, CS
    DAHL, DS
    MIDDLETON, RG
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1977, 117 (02): : 197 - 198
  • [7] The role of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for the staging of prostate cancer
    Pisani, E
    Trinchieri, A
    Zanetti, G
    Nespoli, R
    ADVANCES IN SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1996, : 39 - 41
  • [8] LAPAROSCOPIC PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN THE STAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    SANZ, CR
    BLASMARIN, M
    SANZ, LR
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1993, 24 : 19 - 21
  • [9] The evaluation and staging of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Robert E Mitchell
    Mark H Katz
    James M McKiernan
    Mitchell C Benson
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2005, 2 : 356 - 357
  • [10] The evaluation and staging of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Mitchell, RE
    Katz, MH
    McKiernan, JM
    Benson, MC
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2005, 2 (08): : 356 - 357