How Should Discrete Choice Experiments with Duration Choice Sets Be Presented for the Valuation of Health States?

被引:10
|
作者
Mulhern, Brendan [1 ]
Norman, Richard [2 ]
Shah, Koonal [3 ]
Bansback, Nick [4 ]
Longworth, Louise [5 ]
Viney, Rosalie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Hlth Econ Res & Evaluat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Off Hlth Econ, London, England
[4] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] PHMR, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
discrete choice experiment; EQ-5D; health state valuation; utilities; PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURE; DESIGN; LITERACY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X17738754
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Discrete Choice Experiments including duration (DCETTO) can be used to generate utility values for health states from measures such as EQ-5D-5L. However, methodological issues concerning the optimum way to present choice sets remain. The aim of the present study was to test a range of task presentation approaches designed to support the DCETTO completion process. Methods. Four separate presentation approaches were developed to examine different task features including dimension level highlighting, and health state severity and duration level presentation. Choice sets included 2 EQ-5D-5L states paired with 1 of 4 duration levels, and a third immediate death option. The same design, including 120 choice sets (developed using optimal methods), was employed across all approaches. The online survey was administered to a sample of the Australian population who completed 20 choice sets across 2 approaches. Conditional logit regression was used to assess model consistency, and scale parameter testing investigated poolability. Results. Overall 1,565 respondents completed the survey. Three approaches, using different dimension level highlighting techniques, produced mainly monotonic coefficients that resulted in a larger disutility as the severity level increased (excepting usual activities levels 2/3). The fourth approach, using a level indicator to present the severity levels, has slightly more non-monotonicity and produced larger ordered differences for the more severe dimension levels. Scale parameter testing suggested that the data cannot be pooled. Conclusions. The results provide information regarding how to present DCE tasks for health state valuation. The findings improve our understanding of the impact of different presentation approaches on valuation, and how DCE questions could be presented to be amenable to completion. However, it is unclear if the task presentation impacts online respondent engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 318
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Learning how to choose-effects of instructional choice sets in discrete choice experiments
    Meyerhoff, Juergen
    Glenk, Klaus
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 41 : 122 - 142
  • [2] The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments
    Hoyos, David
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (08) : 1595 - 1603
  • [3] Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?
    Brendan Mulhern
    Richard Norman
    Paula Lorgelly
    Emily Lancsar
    Julie Ratcliffe
    John Brazier
    Rosalie Viney
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2017, 35 : 439 - 451
  • [4] Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Norman, Richard
    Lorgelly, Paula
    Lancsar, Emily
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    Brazier, John
    Viney, Rosalie
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2017, 35 (04) : 439 - 451
  • [5] How Many Choice Sets and Alternatives are Optimal? Consistency in Choice Experiments
    Chung, Chanjin
    Boyer, Tracy
    Han, Sungill
    [J]. AGRIBUSINESS, 2011, 27 (01) : 114 - 125
  • [6] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends
    Haode Wang
    Donna L. Rowen
    John E. Brazier
    Litian Jiang
    [J]. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2023, 21 : 405 - 418
  • [7] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends
    Wang, Haode
    Rowen, Donna L.
    Brazier, John E.
    Jiang, Litian
    [J]. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2023, 21 (03) : 405 - 418
  • [8] Discrete choice with large choice sets
    Bordley, Robert
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 118 (01) : 13 - 15
  • [9] Is Best-Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments
    Krucien, Nicolas
    Watson, Verity
    Ryan, Mandy
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (12) : E1 - E16
  • [10] How Are Debriefing Questions Used in Health Discrete Choice Experiments? An Online Survey
    Pearce, Alison M.
    Mulhern, Brendan J.
    Watson, Verity
    Viney, Rosalie C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (03) : 289 - 293