Exploring ecological patterns with structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis

被引:151
|
作者
Arhonditsis, GB
Stow, CA
Steinberg, LJ
Kenney, MA
Lathrop, RC
McBride, SJ
Reckhow, KH
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm & Earth Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Univ S Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Tulane Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Nat Resources, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Limnol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
structural equation modeling; ecological patterns; Bayesian analysis; phytoplankton dynamics; water quality management;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.028
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Structural equation modeling is a multivariate statistical method that allows evaluation of a network of relationships between manifest and latent variables. In this statistical technique, preconceptualizations that reflect research questions or existing knowledge of system structure create the initial framework for model development, while both direct and indirect effects and measurement errors are considered. Given the interesting features of this method, it is quite surprising that the number of applications in ecology is limited, and even less common in aquatic ecosystems. This study presents two examples where structural equation modeling is used for exploring ecological structures; i.e., summer epilimnetic phytoplankton dynamics. Both eutrophic (Lake Mendota) and mesotrophic (Lake Washington) conditions were used to test an initial hypothesized model that considered the regulatory role of abiotic factors and biological interactions on lake phytoplankton dynamics and water clarity during the summer stratification period. Generally, the model gave plausible results, while a higher proportion of the observed variability was accounted for in the eutrophic environment. Most importantly, we show that structural equation modeling provided a convenient means for assessing the relative role of several ecological processes (e.g., vertical mixing, intrusions of the hypolimnetic nutrient stock, herbivory) known to determine the levels of water quality variables of management interest (e.g., water clarity, cyanobacteria). A Bayesian hierarchical methodology is also introduced to relax the classical identifiability restrictions and treat them as stochastic. Additional advantages of the Bayesian approach are the flexible incorporation of prior knowledge on parameters, the ability to get information on multimodality in marginal densities (undetectable by standard procedures), and the fact that the structural equation modeling process does not rely on asymptotic theory which is particularly important when the sample size is small (commonly experienced in environmental studies). Special emphasis is given on how this Bayesian methodological framework can be used for assessing eutrophic conditions and assisting water quality management. Structural equation modeling has several attractive features that can be particularly useful to researchers when exploring ecological patterns or disentangling complex environmental management issues. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 409
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bayesian analysis of structural equation Modeling
    Shigemasu, K
    Hoshino, T
    Ohmori, T
    MEASUREMENT AND MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2002, : 207 - 216
  • [2] Prior Sensitivity Analysis in Default Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling
    van Erp, Sara
    Mulder, Joris
    Oberski, Daniel L.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 23 (02) : 363 - 388
  • [3] Contributions to Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling
    Demeyer, Severine
    Fischer, Nicolas
    Saporta, Gilbert
    COMPSTAT'2010: 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2010, : 469 - 476
  • [4] Structural equation modeling: A Bayesian approach
    Hayashi, Kentaro
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2008, 15 (03) : 534 - 540
  • [5] Structural equation modelling analysis of evolutionary and ecological patterns in Australian Banksia
    He, Tianhua
    POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2013, 55 (03) : 461 - 467
  • [6] Bayesian structural equation modeling for the health index
    Yanuar, Ferra
    Ibrahim, Kamarulzaman
    Jemain, Abdul Aziz
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2013, 40 (06) : 1254 - 1269
  • [7] A Systematic Evaluation and Comparison Between Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling and Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling
    Guo, Jiesi
    Marsh, Herbert W.
    Parker, Philip D.
    Dicke, Theresa
    Luedtke, Oliver
    Diallo, Thierno M. O.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2019, 26 (04) : 529 - 556
  • [8] Efficient Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling in Stan
    Merkle, Edgar C.
    Fitzsimmons, Ellen
    Uanhoro, James
    Goodrich, Ben
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2021, 100 (06): : 1 - 22
  • [9] Structural Equation Modeling, A Bayesian Approach.
    Palomo, Jesus
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2009, 74 (04) : 747 - 748
  • [10] Bayesian approaches in ecological analysis and modeling
    Reckhow, KH
    MODELS IN ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE, 2003, : 168 - 183