Modeling of Xerostomia After Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Registry Study

被引:11
|
作者
Onjukka, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Mercke, Claes [2 ,3 ]
Bjorgvinsson, Einar [3 ]
Embring, Anna [2 ,3 ]
Berglund, Anders [4 ]
Alexandersson von Dobeln, Gabriella [3 ]
Friesland, Signe [2 ,3 ]
Gagliardi, Giovanna [1 ]
Lenneby Helleday, Clara [3 ]
Sjodin, Helena [3 ]
Lax, Ingmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Med Radiat Phys & Nucl Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Oncol Pathol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Epistat Epidemiol & Stat Consulting, Uppsala, Sweden
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 10卷
关键词
xerostomia; head and neck cancer; cox regression; nomogram; registry analysis; PATIENT-RATED XEROSTOMIA; 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; STICKY SALIVA; NTCP MODELS; GLANDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.01647
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim Data from a local quality registry are used to model the risk of late xerostomia after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC), based on dosimetric- and clinical variables. Strengths and weaknesses of using quality registry data are explored. Methods HNC patients treated with radiotherapy at the Karolinska University hospital are entered into a quality registry at routine follow up, recording morbidity according to a modified RTOG/LENT-SOMA scale. Other recorded parameters are performance status, age, gender, tumor location, tumor stage, smoking status, chemotherapy and radiotherapy data, including prescribed dose and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose. Most patients are entered at several time points, but at variable times after treatment. Xerostomia was modeled based on follow-up data from January 2014 to October 2018, resulting in 753 patients. Two endpoints were considered: maximum grade >= 2 (XERG >= 2) or grade >= 3 (XERG >= 3) late xerostomia. Univariate Cox regression was used to select variables for two multivariate models for each endpoint, one based on the mean dose to the total parotid volume (D-tot) and one based on the mean dose to the contralateral parotid (D-contra). Cox regression allows the estimation of the risk of xerostomia at different time points; models were presented visually as nomograms estimating the risk at 9, 12, and 24 months respectively. Results The toxicity rates were 366/753 (49%) for XER(G >= 2)and 40/753 (5.3%) for XERG >= 3. The multivariate models included several variables for XERG >= 2, and dose, concomitant chemotherapy and age were included for XERG >= 3. Induction chemotherapy and an increased number of fractions per week were associated with a lower risk of XERG >= 2. However, since the causality of these relationships have limited support from previous studies, alternative models without these variables were also presented. The models based on the mean dose to the total parotid volume and the contralateral parotid alone were very similar. Conclusion Late xerostomia after radiotherapy can be modeled with reasonable predictive power based on registry data; models are presented for different endpoints highly relevant in clinical practice. However, the risk of modeling indirect relationships, given the unavoidably heterogeneous registry data, needs to be carefully considered in the interpretation of the results.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dental loss after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
    Kovarik, Josef Paul
    Voborna, Iva
    Barclay, Stewart
    Nicol, Ailsa
    Kelly, Charles
    Kovarik, Petr Daniel
    Iqbal, Muhammad Shahid
    Kovarik, Josef
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2021, 231 (08) : 473 - 478
  • [42] The incidence of hypothyroidism after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
    Pil, J.
    Nevens, D.
    Van der Vorst, A.
    Gadan, C.
    Nuyts, S.
    [J]. B-ENT, 2016, 12 (04): : 257 - 262
  • [43] Hypothyroidism after external radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
    Tell, R
    Sjodin, H
    Lundell, G
    Lewin, F
    Lewensohn, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 303 - 308
  • [44] Dental loss after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
    Josef Paul Kovarik
    Iva Voborna
    Stewart Barclay
    Ailsa Nicol
    Charles Kelly
    Petr Daniel Kovarik
    Muhammad Shahid Iqbal
    Josef Kovarik
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2021, 231 : 473 - 478
  • [45] Omitting radiotherapy after head and neck cancer surgery
    Gourd, Elizabeth
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (08): : E401 - E401
  • [46] Predicting Recurrence After Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer
    Begg, Adrian C.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 22 (02) : 108 - 118
  • [47] Hypothyroidism after radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancer
    Ozawa, Hiroyuki
    Saitou, Hideyuki
    Mizutari, Kunio
    Takata, Yasunori
    Ogawa, Kaoru
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 28 (01) : 46 - 49
  • [48] Matched case-control study of quality of life and xerostomia after intensity-modulated radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: Initial report
    Jabbari, S
    Kim, HM
    Feng, M
    Lin, A
    Tsien, C
    Elshaikh, M
    Terrel, JE
    Murdoch-Kinch, C
    Eisbruch, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (03): : 725 - 731
  • [49] Impact of head and neck cancer adaptive radiotherapy to spare the parotid glands and decrease the risk of xerostomia
    Joel Castelli
    Antoine Simon
    Guillaume Louvel
    Olivier Henry
    Enrique Chajon
    Mohamed Nassef
    Pascal Haigron
    Guillaume Cazoulat
    Juan David Ospina
    Franck Jegoux
    Karen Benezery
    Renaud de Crevoisier
    [J]. Radiation Oncology, 10
  • [50] AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF XEROSTOMIA ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING RADIOTHERAPY.
    Fallon, A.
    Sloane, P.
    Coffey, M.
    Craig, A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S319 - S319