Modeling of Xerostomia After Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Registry Study

被引:12
|
作者
Onjukka, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Mercke, Claes [2 ,3 ]
Bjorgvinsson, Einar [3 ]
Embring, Anna [2 ,3 ]
Berglund, Anders [4 ]
Alexandersson von Dobeln, Gabriella [3 ]
Friesland, Signe [2 ,3 ]
Gagliardi, Giovanna [1 ]
Lenneby Helleday, Clara [3 ]
Sjodin, Helena [3 ]
Lax, Ingmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Med Radiat Phys & Nucl Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Oncol Pathol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Epistat Epidemiol & Stat Consulting, Uppsala, Sweden
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2020年 / 10卷
关键词
xerostomia; head and neck cancer; cox regression; nomogram; registry analysis; PATIENT-RATED XEROSTOMIA; 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; STICKY SALIVA; NTCP MODELS; GLANDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.01647
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim Data from a local quality registry are used to model the risk of late xerostomia after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC), based on dosimetric- and clinical variables. Strengths and weaknesses of using quality registry data are explored. Methods HNC patients treated with radiotherapy at the Karolinska University hospital are entered into a quality registry at routine follow up, recording morbidity according to a modified RTOG/LENT-SOMA scale. Other recorded parameters are performance status, age, gender, tumor location, tumor stage, smoking status, chemotherapy and radiotherapy data, including prescribed dose and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose. Most patients are entered at several time points, but at variable times after treatment. Xerostomia was modeled based on follow-up data from January 2014 to October 2018, resulting in 753 patients. Two endpoints were considered: maximum grade >= 2 (XERG >= 2) or grade >= 3 (XERG >= 3) late xerostomia. Univariate Cox regression was used to select variables for two multivariate models for each endpoint, one based on the mean dose to the total parotid volume (D-tot) and one based on the mean dose to the contralateral parotid (D-contra). Cox regression allows the estimation of the risk of xerostomia at different time points; models were presented visually as nomograms estimating the risk at 9, 12, and 24 months respectively. Results The toxicity rates were 366/753 (49%) for XER(G >= 2)and 40/753 (5.3%) for XERG >= 3. The multivariate models included several variables for XERG >= 2, and dose, concomitant chemotherapy and age were included for XERG >= 3. Induction chemotherapy and an increased number of fractions per week were associated with a lower risk of XERG >= 2. However, since the causality of these relationships have limited support from previous studies, alternative models without these variables were also presented. The models based on the mean dose to the total parotid volume and the contralateral parotid alone were very similar. Conclusion Late xerostomia after radiotherapy can be modeled with reasonable predictive power based on registry data; models are presented for different endpoints highly relevant in clinical practice. However, the risk of modeling indirect relationships, given the unavoidably heterogeneous registry data, needs to be carefully considered in the interpretation of the results.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Xerostomia following radiotherapy of the head and neck affects vocal function
    Roh, JL
    Kim, AY
    Cho, MJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (13) : 3016 - 3023
  • [32] Radiotherapy related xerostomia in head and neck oncology: A systematic review
    Johns, D.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [33] Impact of radiation-induced xerostomia on quality of life after primary radiotherapy among patients with head and neck cancer
    Jellema, Anke Petra
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Doornaert, Patricia
    Leemans, C. Rene
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : 751 - 760
  • [34] THE GRONINGEN RADIOTHERAPY-INDUCED XEROSTOMIA QUESTIONNAIRE: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW XEROSTOMIA QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PATIENTS TREATED WITH RADIOTHERAPY FOR HEAD AND NECK CANCER.
    Christianen, M.
    Burlage, F.
    Bijl, H.
    Hoegen-Chouvalova, O.
    de Bock, T.
    Langendijk, H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S271 - S271
  • [35] Hypnosis for Postradiation Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study
    Schiff, Elad
    Mogilner, Jorge G.
    Sella, Eyal
    Doweck, Ilana
    Hershko, Oded
    Ben-Arye, Eran
    Yarom, Noam
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2009, 37 (06) : 1086 - 1092
  • [36] Late dysphagia, xerostomia, neck fibrosis and toxic death after IMRT for head and neck cancer
    Duprez, F.
    Berwouts, D.
    Madani, I.
    Boterberg, T.
    De Neve, W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S3 - S4
  • [37] Prognostic Factors for Complete Recovery From Xerostomia After Radiotherapy of Head-and-Neck Cancers
    Rades, Dirk
    Warwas, Britta
    Gerull, Karsten
    Pries, Ralph
    Leichtle, Anke
    Bruchhage, Karl L.
    Hakim, Samer G.
    Schild, Steven E.
    Cremers, Florian
    IN VIVO, 2022, 36 (04): : 1795 - 1800
  • [38] Quantification of very late xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients after irradiation
    Blitzer, Grace C.
    Rogus-Pulia, Nicole M.
    Paz, Cristina
    Nickel, Kwangok P.
    Cannaday, Vanessa L.
    Kelm-Nelson, Cynthia A.
    Sudakaran, Sailendharan
    Chappell, Richard J.
    Glazer, Tiffany
    Kimple, Randall J.
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 7 (04): : 1018 - 1024
  • [39] Impact of head and neck cancer adaptive radiotherapy to spare the parotid glands and decrease the risk of xerostomia
    Castelli, Joel
    Simon, Antoine
    Louvel, Guillaume
    Henry, Olivier
    Chajon, Enrique
    Nassef, Mohamed
    Haigron, Pascal
    Cazoulat, Guillaume
    Ospina, Juan David
    Jegoux, Franck
    Benezery, Karen
    de Crevoisier, Renaud
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
  • [40] Jaw function after head & neck radiotherapy for cancer
    Crow, HC
    Ship, JA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 1368 - 1368