Glacial isostatic adjustment constrains dehydration stiffening beneath Iceland

被引:8
|
作者
Schmidt, Peter [1 ]
Lund, Bjorn [1 ]
Arnadottir, Thora [2 ]
Schmeling, Harro [3 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Iceland, Inst Earth Sci, Nord Volcanol Ctr, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
[3] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Earth Sci, Sect Geophys, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
glacial isostatic adjustment; Iceland; dehydration stiffening; rheology; viscosity; PLASTIC-DEFORMATION; DISLOCATION CREEP; NORTH-ATLANTIC; MANTLE FLOW; SEA LEVELS; OLIVINE; WATER; RHEOLOGY; MELT; VISCOSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsl.2012.10.015
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
During melting in the upper mantle the preferred partitioning of water into the melt will effectively dehydrate the solid residue. Linear extrapolation of laboratory experiments suggests that dehydration can produce a sharp viscosity contrast (increase) of a factor 500 across the dry solidus. In this study we show that the suggested magnitude of dehydration stiffening in a plume-ridge setting is incompatible with the present glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) in Iceland. Using GPS observations of current CIA in Iceland, we find that the data are best fit by a viscosity contrast over the dry solidus in the range 0.5-3. A viscosity contrast higher than 10 requires a mantle viscosity below the dry solidus lower than 4-8 x 10(18) Pa s, depending on the thickness of the dehydrated layer. A viscosity contrast of 100 or more demands a mantle viscosity of 10(18) Pa s or less. However, we show here that a non-linear extrapolation of the laboratory data predicts a viscosity contrast as low as a factor 3-29, assuming conditions of constant strain rate to constant viscous dissipation rate. This is compatible with our CIA results and suggests that the plume-ridge interaction beneath Iceland is governed by a non-linear rheology and controlled by a combination of kinematic and dynamic boundary conditions rather than buoyant forces alone. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 161
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparisons among contemporary glacial isostatic adjustment models
    Guo, J. Y.
    Huang, Z. W.
    Shum, C. K.
    van der Wal, W.
    JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2012, 61 : 129 - 137
  • [22] Glacial isostatic adjustment in Fennoscandia for a laterally heterogeneous earth
    Kaufmann, G
    Wu, P
    Li, GY
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 143 (01) : 262 - 273
  • [23] Special section on observation and modeling of glacial isostatic adjustment
    Vermeersen, Bert L. A.
    Ivins, Erik R.
    King, Matt A.
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2011, 511 (3-4) : 67 - 68
  • [24] Contribution of glacial-isostatic adjustment to the geocenter motion
    Klemann, Volker
    Martinec, Zdenek
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2011, 511 (3-4) : 99 - 108
  • [25] Glacial isostatic adjustment and nonstationary signals observed by GRACE
    Tregoning, Paul
    Ramillien, Guillaume
    McQueen, Herbert
    Zwartz, Dan
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2009, 114
  • [26] Progress in modelling and observing Antarctic glacial isostatic adjustment
    King, Matt A.
    ASTRONOMY & GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 54 (04) : 33 - 38
  • [27] An improved Glacial Isostatic Adjustment model for the British Isles
    Bradley, Sarah L.
    Milne, Glenn A.
    Shennan, Ian
    Edwards, Robin
    JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE, 2011, 26 (05) : 541 - 552
  • [28] Constraining models of glacial isostatic adjustment in eastern North America
    Parang, Soran
    Milne, Glenn A.
    Tarasov, Lev
    Love, Ryan
    Yousefi, Maryam
    Vacchi, Matteo
    QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2024, 334
  • [29] Timescales of glacial isostatic adjustment in Greenland: is transient rheology required?
    Pan, Linda
    Mitrovica, Jerry X.
    Milne, Glenn A.
    Hoggard, Mark J.
    Woodroffe, Sarah A.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 237 (02) : 989 - 995
  • [30] Glacial isostatic adjustment deflects the path of the ancestral Hudson River
    Pico, T.
    Mitrovica, J. X.
    Braun, J.
    Ferrier, K. L.
    GEOLOGY, 2018, 46 (07) : 591 - 594