Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology

被引:173
|
作者
Brown, William, III [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yen, Po-Yin [4 ]
Rojas, Marlene [5 ]
Schnall, Rebecca [5 ]
机构
[1] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, HIV Ctr Clin & Behav Studies, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, New York, NY 10032 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Usability; Evaluation framework; Mobile health; Health-ITUEM; INFORMATION; CARE; PERCEPTIONS; CHALLENGES; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbi.2013.08.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background: Over two decades of research has been conducted using mobile devices for health related behaviors yet many of these studies lack rigor. There are few evaluation frameworks for assessing the usability of mHealth, which is critical as the use of this technology proliferates. As the development of interventions using mobile technology increase, future work in this domain necessitates the use of a rigorous usability evaluation framework. Methods: We used two exemplars to assess the appropriateness of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating the usability of mHealth technology. In the first exemplar, we conducted 6 focus group sessions to explore adolescents' use of mobile technology for meeting their health Information needs. In the second exemplar, we conducted 4 focus group sessions following an Ecological Momentary Assessment study in which 60 adolescents were given a smartphone with pre-installed health-related applications (apps). Data analysis: We coded the focus group data using the 9 concepts of the Health-ITUEM: Error prevention, Completeness, Memorability, Information needs, Flexibility/Customizability, Learnability, Performance speed, Competency, Other outcomes. To develop a finer granularity of analysis, the nine concepts were broken into positive, negative, and neutral codes. A total of 27 codes were created. Two raters (R1 and R2) initially coded all text and a third rater (R3) reconciled coding discordance between raters R1 and R2. Results: A total of 133 codes were applied to Exemplar I. In Exemplar 2 there were a total of 286 codes applied to 195 excerpts. Performance speed, Other outcomes, and Information needs were among the most frequently occurring codes. Conclusion: Our two exemplars demonstrated the appropriateness and usefulness of the Health-ITUEM in evaluating mobile health technology. Further assessment of this framework with other study populations should consider whether Memorability and Error prevention are necessary to include when evaluating mHealth technology. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1080 / 1087
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Experiences of community health workers on the use of mobile health technology (mHealth) to improve utilization of maternal health services in rural Malawi: A qualitative study
    Kachimanga, Chiyembekezo
    Mulwafu, Manuel
    Ndambo, Myness
    Omolade, Ibukun-Oluwa
    Kulinkina, Alexandra V.
    van den Akker, Thomas
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2023, 28 : 287 - 287
  • [42] Improving Usability of Health Information Technology
    Hirschtritt, Matthew E.
    Hirschtritt, Deirdre B.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (04): : 364 - 365
  • [43] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN CHILD HEALTH
    Ungar, W.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A206 - A207
  • [44] Health Technology Assessment in Oral Health
    Esfandiari, Shahrokh
    Feine, Jocelyne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 : 93 - 100
  • [45] A Review of Usability Methods Used in the Evaluation of Mobile Health Applications for Diabetes
    Georgsson, Mattias
    [J]. PHEALTH 2020: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEARABLE MICRO AND NANO TECHNOLOGIES FOR PERSONALIZED HEALTH, 2020, 273 : 228 - 233
  • [46] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE ON E-HEALTH/M-HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES: EVALUATING THE TRANSPARENCY AND THOROUGHNESS
    Vukovic, Vladimir
    Favaretti, Carlo
    Ricciardi, Walter
    de Waure, Chiara
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 34 (01) : 87 - 96
  • [47] Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS
    Rajak, Manindra
    Shaw, Krishnendu
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2019, 59
  • [48] From Health Technology Assessment to Health Technology Sustainability
    Iandolo, Francesca
    Vito, Pietro
    Fulco, Irene
    Loia, Francesca
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [49] EVALUATION OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
    Dipankui, Mylene Tantchou
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Desmartis, Marie
    Legare, France
    Piron, Florence
    Gagnon, Johanne
    Rhiands, Marc
    Coulombe, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 31 (03) : 166 - 170
  • [50] Using Mobile Health (mHealth) Technology in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus, Physical Inactivity, and Smoking
    Hasan Rehman
    Ayeesha K. Kamal
    Saleem Sayani
    Pamela B. Morris
    Anwar T. Merchant
    Salim S. Virani
    [J]. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 2017, 19