Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS

被引:112
|
作者
Rajak, Manindra [1 ]
Shaw, Krishnendu [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Indian Sch Mines, Dept Management Studies, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India
关键词
mHealth; MCDM; AHP; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Fuzzy set theory; eHealth; STUDENTS BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION-MAKING; SERVICE QUALITY; PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; PHYSICIANS ACCEPTANCE; SYSTEMS; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101186
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
mHealth is an innovative, mobile application based system, which has the ability to assist people to manage their health better. With the increasing number of mHealth applications, it is very difficult to choose the ideal application. As of now, very limited studies have been carried out on mHealth application selection. To fill the existing research gaps, this study endeavours to develop a model for mHealth application selection by adopting a combined approach of AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. The hierarchical model has been developed using factors identified from literature review and expert opinions. The ambiguity in comparing different mHealth applications has been handled by applying fuzzy set theory. The AHP has been used to determine the weights of criteria and sub-criteria, and the fuzzy-TOPSIS method has been used to obtain the final ranking of the applications. The applicability of the proposed model has been discussed through a numerical case example. The sensitivity analysis has been carried out by changing the weights of the criteria. In this study, user satisfaction, functionality, easy to learn and use, and information quality, have come out as important factors in mHealth application selection. The proposed method will help users as well as medical practitioners to select the proper mHealth application in this digital world.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of an Apartment Selection Model by Integrating Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Luc M.H.
    Nguyen Q.V.
    Do Q.H.
    Van Trang T.
    International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [2] Operating system selection using fuzzy AHP and topsis methods
    Balli, Serkan
    Korukoǧlu, Serdar
    Mathematical and Computational Applications, 2009, 14 (02) : 119 - 130
  • [3] OPERATING SYSTEM SELECTION USING FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS METHODS
    Balli, Serkan
    Korukoglu, Serdar
    MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL APPLICATIONS, 2009, 14 (02): : 119 - 130
  • [4] Player Selection for a National Football Team using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Pehlivan, Nimet Yapici
    Unal, Yener
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 32 (5-6) : 369 - 405
  • [5] An evaluation of quality goals by using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology
    Tadic, Danijela
    Gumus, Alev Taskin
    Arsovski, Slavko
    Aleksic, Aleksandar
    Stefanovic, Miladin
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2013, 25 (03) : 547 - 556
  • [6] A FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS FOR ELV DISMANTLING SELECTION
    Tadic, Danijela
    Arsovski, Slavko
    Stefanovic, Miladin
    Aleksic, Aleksandar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2010, 4 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [7] EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENT WEBSITES USING INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Gocer, Fethullah
    UNCERTAINTY MODELLING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 10 : 930 - 935
  • [8] SYSTEMATIC SELECTION OF BLOCKCHAIN PLATFORMS USING FUZZY AHP-TOPSIS
    Muradi, Shahr Banoo
    Chiam, Yin Kia
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2023, 36 (02) : 99 - 123
  • [9] Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    Yavuz, Serkan
    Kilinc, Nevzat
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) : 8143 - 8151
  • [10] Landfill site selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study for Istanbul
    Ahmet Beskese
    H. Handan Demir
    H. Kurtulus Ozcan
    H. Eser Okten
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73 : 3513 - 3521