3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography:: In vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts

被引:27
|
作者
Wall, A [1 ]
Kugel, H [1 ]
Bachman, R [1 ]
Matuszewski, L [1 ]
Krämer, S [1 ]
Heindel, W [1 ]
Maintz, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Clin Radiol, D-48129 Munster, Germany
关键词
magnetic resonance angiography; high-field MR; stents; artifacts; 3 T vascular;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20445
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the signal characteristics of different iliac artery stents in MR angiography (MRA) at 3 T in comparison with 1.5 T. Materials and Methods: Sixteen iliac artery stents were implanted in plastic tubes filled with a solution of Gd-DTPA and imaged at 3 T and 1.5 T using a T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient-echo sequence. Image analysis included a subjective assessment of artifact characteristics, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements in stented and unstented vessel parts, and quantitative measurements of total artifact size. Results: The pattern of stent artifacts inside the stents evidently did not differ at 3 T and 1.5 T. The average total size of the artifact areas surrounding the stents was significantly larger at 3 T (P < 0.03). However. within the stented part of the vessel phantom, the signal of the lumen and its contrast to modeled surrounding tissue was significantly higher at the higher field. The mean SNR of the lumen increased from 95.5 at 1.5 T to 127.3 at 3 T, and the CNR of the vessel increased from 70.3 to 93. Conclusion: Assessment of the stent lumen in iliac artery stents in a phantom model is not compromised by imaging at 3 T compared to 1.5 T. The signal gain inside the stented part of the vessel lumen at higher field compensates for the higher degree of stent artifacts seen in stents made of steel or cobalt.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / 779
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR angiography of the head and neck
    DeLano, MC
    DeMarco, JK
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 321 - +
  • [2] In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography
    Maintz, D
    Kugel, H
    Schellhammer, F
    Landwehr, P
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2001, 36 (04) : 218 - 224
  • [3] Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the spine
    Phalke, Vaishali V.
    Gujar, Sachin
    Quint, Douglas J.
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 241 - +
  • [4] 3.0-T MR Imaging of the Abdomen: Comparison with 1.5 T
    Chang, Kevin J.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Bluemke, David A.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (07) : 1983 - 1998
  • [5] 3.0 T MR angiography
    Scarabino, T
    Nemore, E
    Giannatempo, GM
    Popolizio, T
    Stranieri, A
    Carriero, A
    Salvolini, U
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 2004, 17 (06): : 777 - 783
  • [6] MR angiography of intracranial aneurysms: A comparison of 0.5 T and 1.5 T
    Korogi, Y
    Takahashi, M
    Mabuchi, N
    Watabe, T
    Shiokawa, Y
    Shiga, H
    OUchi, T
    Nakagawa, T
    Miki, H
    Horikawa, Y
    Fujiwara, S
    Furuse, M
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 1997, 21 (02) : 111 - 116
  • [7] Cardiac MR imaging and MR angiography in pediatric congenital heart disease: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T
    KL Nguyen
    SN Khan
    J Moriarty
    K Mohajer
    P Renella
    G Satou
    I Ayad
    S Patel
    I Boechat
    P Finn
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 15 (Suppl 1)
  • [8] Intraindividual comparison of high-spatial-resolution abdominal MR angiography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Initial experience
    Michaely, Henrik J.
    Kramer, Harald
    Dietrich, Olaf
    Nael, Kambiz
    Lodemann, Klaus-Peter
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (03) : 907 - 913
  • [9] In vitro comparison of intracranial stent visibility using various concentrations of gadolinium contrast agent under 1.5 T and 3 T MR angiography
    Chiang, Chen-Hua
    Tseng, Ying-Chi
    Chen, Ai-Chi
    Huang, Yen-Lin
    Chen, David Yen-Ting
    Chen, Chi-Jen
    Lin, Yen-Kuang
    Hsu, Hui-Ling
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2017, 9 (04) : 399 - +
  • [10] MR colonoscopy at 3.0 T:: comparison with 1.5 T in vivo and a colon model
    Roettgen, Rainer
    Herzog, Harry
    Bogen, Paul
    Freund, Thorsten
    Felix, Roland
    Bruhn, Harald
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2006, 30 (04) : 248 - 253