3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR angiography of the head and neck

被引:16
|
作者
DeLano, MC [1 ]
DeMarco, JK [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Radiol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.nic.2006.03.002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This article presents the advantages and challenges of MR angiography of the intracranial and extracranial cerebral vasculature at 3.0 T with comparative assessment to 1.5 T approaches. The physical basis for the superiority of 3.0 T MR angiography is discussed in the context of evolving technological capabilities afforded by the synergistic advent of higher field scanners, improved coil design, and parallel imaging. This review emphasizes 3.0 T issues related to noncontrast three-dimensional time of flight MR angiography of the intracranial circulation, contrast enhanced three-dimensional time of flight MR angiography of the extracranial cerebral vasculature, and carotid plaque characterization.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: Imaging of the spine
    Phalke, Vaishali V.
    Gujar, Sachin
    Quint, Douglas J.
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 241 - +
  • [2] 3.0 T MR angiography
    Scarabino, T
    Nemore, E
    Giannatempo, GM
    Popolizio, T
    Stranieri, A
    Carriero, A
    Salvolini, U
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 2004, 17 (06): : 777 - 783
  • [3] Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography
    van den Bosch, Harrie C. M.
    Westenberg, Jos J. M.
    Caris, Ralph
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    Tielbeek, Alexander V.
    Cuypers, Philip W. M.
    de Roos, Albert
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) : 337 - 346
  • [4] Functional MR imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T: A practical review
    Voss, Henning U.
    Zevin, Jason. D.
    McCandliss, Bruce D.
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 285 - +
  • [5] MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging:: Comparing 3.0 T versus 1.5 T
    Dydak, Ulrike
    Schaer, Michael
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : 269 - +
  • [6] Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T versus that at 1.5 T:: Initial results in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease
    Sommer, T
    Hackenbroch, M
    Hofer, U
    Schmiedel, A
    Willinek, WA
    Flacke, S
    Gieseke, J
    Träber, F
    Fimmers, R
    Litt, H
    Schild, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (03) : 718 - 725
  • [7] 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography:: In vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts
    Wall, A
    Kugel, H
    Bachman, R
    Matuszewski, L
    Krämer, S
    Heindel, W
    Maintz, D
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2005, 22 (06) : 772 - 779
  • [8] Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography
    Gibbs, GF
    Huston, J
    Bernstein, MA
    Riederer, SJ
    Brown, RD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (01) : 84 - 87
  • [9] 3.0 T versus 1.5 T imaging - Foreword
    Castillo, M
    Mukherji, SK
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : XIII - XIV
  • [10] 3.0 T versus 1.5 T imaging - Preface
    Roberts, TPL
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (02) : XV - XVI