3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography:: In vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts

被引:27
|
作者
Wall, A [1 ]
Kugel, H [1 ]
Bachman, R [1 ]
Matuszewski, L [1 ]
Krämer, S [1 ]
Heindel, W [1 ]
Maintz, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Clin Radiol, D-48129 Munster, Germany
关键词
magnetic resonance angiography; high-field MR; stents; artifacts; 3 T vascular;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20445
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the signal characteristics of different iliac artery stents in MR angiography (MRA) at 3 T in comparison with 1.5 T. Materials and Methods: Sixteen iliac artery stents were implanted in plastic tubes filled with a solution of Gd-DTPA and imaged at 3 T and 1.5 T using a T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient-echo sequence. Image analysis included a subjective assessment of artifact characteristics, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements in stented and unstented vessel parts, and quantitative measurements of total artifact size. Results: The pattern of stent artifacts inside the stents evidently did not differ at 3 T and 1.5 T. The average total size of the artifact areas surrounding the stents was significantly larger at 3 T (P < 0.03). However. within the stented part of the vessel phantom, the signal of the lumen and its contrast to modeled surrounding tissue was significantly higher at the higher field. The mean SNR of the lumen increased from 95.5 at 1.5 T to 127.3 at 3 T, and the CNR of the vessel increased from 70.3 to 93. Conclusion: Assessment of the stent lumen in iliac artery stents in a phantom model is not compromised by imaging at 3 T compared to 1.5 T. The signal gain inside the stented part of the vessel lumen at higher field compensates for the higher degree of stent artifacts seen in stents made of steel or cobalt.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / 779
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diffusion-tensor fiber tractography: Intraindividual comparison of 3.0-T and 1.5-T MR imaging
    Okada, T
    Miki, Y
    Fushimi, Y
    Hanakawa, T
    Kanagaki, M
    Yamamoto, A
    Urayama, S
    Fukuyama, H
    Hiraoka, M
    Togashi, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (02) : 668 - 678
  • [42] Routine clinical knee MR reports: comparison of diagnostic performance at 1.5 T and 3.0 T for assessment of the articular cartilage
    Mandell, Jacob C.
    Rhodes, Jeffrey A.
    Shah, Nehal
    Gaviola, Glenn C.
    Gomoll, Andreas H.
    Smith, Stacy E.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (11) : 1487 - 1498
  • [43] MR lymphangiography using dendrimer-based contrast agents: A comparison at 1.5T and 3.0T
    Hama, Yukihiro
    Bernardo, Marcelino
    Regino, Celeste A. S.
    Koyama, Yoshinori
    Brechbiel, Martin W.
    Krishna, Murali C.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Kobayashi, Hisataka
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 57 (02) : 431 - 436
  • [44] Acute and subacute intracerebral hemorrhages:: Comparison of MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T -: Initial experience
    Allkemper, T
    Tombach, B
    Schwindt, W
    Kugel, H
    Schilling, M
    Debus, O
    Möllmann, F
    Heindel, W
    RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) : 874 - 881
  • [45] 130 Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T: comparison to steady-state free precession technique at 1.5 T
    Xin Liu
    Xiaoming Bi
    Nondas Leloudas
    Renate Jerecic
    James Carr
    Debiao Li
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 10 (Suppl 1)
  • [46] Ultra-high field MR angiography in human migraine models: a 3.0 T/7.0 T comparison study
    Casper Emil Christensen
    Samaira Younis
    Ulrich Lindberg
    Vincent Oltman Boer
    Patrick de Koning
    Esben Thade Petersen
    Olaf Bjarne Paulson
    Henrik Bo Wiberg Larsson
    Faisal Mohammad Amin
    Messoud Ashina
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2019, 20
  • [47] Fetal brain MR angiography at 1.5 T: a feasible study
    Luísa Sampaio
    Giovanni Morana
    Hernâni Gonçalves
    Andrea Rossi
    Carla Ramalho
    Neuroradiology, 2024, 66 : 271 - 278
  • [48] Fetal brain MR angiography at 1.5 T: a feasible study
    Sampaio, Luisa
    Morana, Giovanni
    Goncalves, Hernani
    Rossi, Andrea
    Ramalho, Carla
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024, 66 (02) : 271 - 278
  • [49] Comparison of MRI scans of patients with optic neuritis at 1.5 T and 3.0 T
    Nielsen, K
    Rostrup, E
    Frederiksen, J
    Knudsen, S
    Mathiesen, H
    Hansson, L
    Paulson, O
    NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (06) : A236 - A237
  • [50] Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-T three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in Moyamoya disease: Preliminary experience
    Fushimi, Y
    Miki, Y
    Kikuta, K
    Okada, T
    Kanagaki, M
    Yamamoto, A
    Nozaki, K
    Hashimoto, N
    Hanakawa, T
    Fukuyama, H
    Togashi, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (01) : 232 - 237