Effects of SME collaboration on R&D in the service sector in open innovation

被引:47
|
作者
Suh, Yongyoon [1 ]
Kim, Moon-Soo [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hankuk Univ Foreign Studies, Dept Ind & Management Engn, Yongin, South Korea
来源
INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT | 2012年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
collaborative activity; collaboration; open innovation; efficiency; service SMEs; R&D in the service sector; data envelopment analysis (DEA); EXTERNAL TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ALLIANCES; KNOWLEDGE; COMMERCIALIZATION; PRODUCTIVITY; CAPABILITIES; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.5172/impp.2012.14.3.349
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study analyses the effects of four types of collaborative activities on the R&D performance of service SMEs in the context of open innovation: in-house R&D (non-collaboration), technology acquisition, R&D collaboration, and networking. For this, the study employs data envelopment analysis, a power tool that uses multiple inputs and outputs to measure the relative efficiency of collaborative activities of service SMEs for R&D. The results indicate that technology acquisition is the most efficient type of collaboration for R&D of service SMEs. More specifically in-house R&D, technology acquisition, and R&D collaboration are positively related to product/service innovation, patenting activity, and process innovation, respectively. However, networking is not significantly related to any three types of R&D performance. In addition, the service SMEs' strategic focus did not match their strategic purposes, suggesting a need for adjusting their collaborative activities. The results have important implications for managers and policy-makers interested in facilitating open innovation in service SMEs through various collaborative activities.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 362
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of proximity on recombination innovation in R&D collaboration: an empirical analysis
    Nan, Ding
    Liu, Fengchao
    Ma, Rongkang
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2018, 30 (08) : 921 - 934
  • [42] Does partner type matter in R&D collaboration for product innovation?
    Kang, Ki H.
    Kang, Jina
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2010, 22 (08) : 945 - 959
  • [43] Another cluster premium: Innovation subsidies and R&D collaboration networks
    Broekel, Tom
    Fornahl, Dirk
    Morrison, Andrea
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (08) : 1431 - 1444
  • [44] The influence of proximity and knowledge base on recombination innovation in R&D collaboration
    Nan, Ding
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (02):
  • [45] UK R&D collaboration venture takes innovation challenge to China
    Collins, Luke
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (04) : 2 - 3
  • [46] The Relevance of Different Open Innovation Strategies for R&D Performers
    Santamaria, Lluis
    Jesus Nieto, Maria
    Barge-Gil, Andres
    [J]. CUADERNOS DE ECONOMIA Y DIRECCION DE LA EMPRESA, 2010, (45): : 93 - 114
  • [47] A symbiosis dynamic analysis for collaborative R&D in open innovation
    Yang, Chia-Han
    Shyu, Joseph Z.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2010, 5 (01) : 74 - 84
  • [48] Open innovation strategies in top R&D spending companies
    Michelino, Francesca
    Cammarano, Antonello
    Caputo, Mauro
    Lamberti, Emilia
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL ICE CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION (ICE), 2014,
  • [49] Intermediating R&D and Marketing Value Creation by Open Innovation
    Wang, S.
    Chen, J.
    Xie, F.
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2011, : 1170 - 1174