Effects of SME collaboration on R&D in the service sector in open innovation

被引:47
|
作者
Suh, Yongyoon [1 ]
Kim, Moon-Soo [2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hankuk Univ Foreign Studies, Dept Ind & Management Engn, Yongin, South Korea
来源
INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT | 2012年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
collaborative activity; collaboration; open innovation; efficiency; service SMEs; R&D in the service sector; data envelopment analysis (DEA); EXTERNAL TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; FIRM PERFORMANCE; ALLIANCES; KNOWLEDGE; COMMERCIALIZATION; PRODUCTIVITY; CAPABILITIES; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.5172/impp.2012.14.3.349
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study analyses the effects of four types of collaborative activities on the R&D performance of service SMEs in the context of open innovation: in-house R&D (non-collaboration), technology acquisition, R&D collaboration, and networking. For this, the study employs data envelopment analysis, a power tool that uses multiple inputs and outputs to measure the relative efficiency of collaborative activities of service SMEs for R&D. The results indicate that technology acquisition is the most efficient type of collaboration for R&D of service SMEs. More specifically in-house R&D, technology acquisition, and R&D collaboration are positively related to product/service innovation, patenting activity, and process innovation, respectively. However, networking is not significantly related to any three types of R&D performance. In addition, the service SMEs' strategic focus did not match their strategic purposes, suggesting a need for adjusting their collaborative activities. The results have important implications for managers and policy-makers interested in facilitating open innovation in service SMEs through various collaborative activities.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 362
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Delicate Balance for Innovation: Competition and Collaboration in R&D Consortia
    Chen, Dong
    Dai, Li
    Li, Donghong
    [J]. MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2019, 15 (01) : 145 - 176
  • [22] R&D Collaboration and Innovation in China's Emerging Market
    Zhou, Wubiao
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHINESE ENTERPRISE RESEARCH 2007, 2008, : 283 - 312
  • [23] International U-I Collaboration: A Bridge Across Open Innovation, R&D Globalization and National Innovation System
    Jin, Jun
    Wu, Shanchao
    Chen, Jin
    [J]. PICMET 2010: TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2010,
  • [24] Subsidized R&D collaboration: The causal effect of innovation vouchers on innovation outcomes
    Kleine, Marco
    Heite, Jonas
    Huber, Laura Rosendahl
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2022, 51 (06)
  • [25] Open innovation: A paradigm shift in pharma R&D?
    Schuhmacher, Alexander
    Gassmann, Oliver
    Bieniok, Doria
    Hinder, Markus
    Hartl, Dominik
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2022, 27 (09) : 2395 - 2405
  • [26] Open innovation and the evolving federal R&D enterprise
    Kuhn, Kevin
    Amos, Helen
    Patel, Sandeep
    Gordon, Ruthanna
    Nelson, Christofer
    Benforado, Jay
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254
  • [27] International R&D Spillovers and Business Service Innovation
    Poeschl, Johannes
    Foster-McGregor, Neil
    Stehrer, Robert
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2016, 39 (12): : 2025 - 2045
  • [28] Open Innovation Models in R&D Intense Industries
    Michelino, Francesca
    Cammarano, Antonello
    Caputo, Mauro
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH, EDUCATION EXCELLENCE, AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH VISION 2020, VOLS I-VII, 2017, : 1832 - 1843
  • [29] Transitioning your R&D toward open innovation
    Munos, Bernard
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 234
  • [30] Management of Outsourcing R&D in the era of open innovation
    Frans, Carpay
    Chieh, Hang Chang
    Dan, Yu
    [J]. ISMOT'07: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2: MANAGING TOTAL INNOVATION AND OPEN INNOVATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2007, : 252 - 256