Face validity, construct validity and training benefits of a virtual reality turp simulator

被引:40
|
作者
Bright, Elizabeth [1 ]
Vine, Samuel [2 ]
Wilson, Mark R. [2 ]
Masters, Rich S. W. [3 ]
McGrath, John S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, Exeter Surg Hlth Serv Res Unit, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Exeter EX1 2LU, Devon, England
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Inst Human Performance, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
TURP; Validity; Virtual reality; Simulation; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; VALIDATION; SKILLS; ACQUISITION; PERFORMANCE; RESIDENTS; SURGERY; UROLOGY; MODEL; VR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.02.012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess face validity, construct validity and the training benefits of a virtual reality TURP simulator. Method: 11 novices (no TURP experience) and 7 experts (>200 TURP's) completed a virtual reality median lobe prostate resection task on the TURPsim (TM) (Simbionix USA Corp., Cleveland, OH). Performance indicators (percentage of prostate resected (PR), percentage of capsular resection (CR) and time diathermy loop active without tissue contact (TAWC) were recorded via the TURPsim (TM) and compared between novices and experts to assess construct validity. Verbal comments provided by experts following task completion were used to assess face validity. Repeated attempts of the task by the novices were analysed to assess the training benefits of the TURPsim (TM). Results: Experts resected a significantly greater percentage of prostate per minute (p < 0.01) and had significantly less active diathermy time without tissue contact (p < 0.01) than novices. After practice, novices were able to perform the simulation more effectively, with significant improvement in all measured parameters. Improvement in performance was noted in novices following repetitive training, as evidenced by improved TAWC scores that were not significantly different from the expert group (p = 0.18). Conclusions: This study has established face and construct validity for the TURPsim (TM). The potential benefit in using this tool to train novices has also been demonstrated. (c) 2012 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 166
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Training transfer validity of virtual reality simulator assessment
    Hjellvik, Simen
    Mallam, Steven
    VIRTUAL REALITY, 2024, 28 (04)
  • [22] Face, content, and construct validity of a simulator for training in endovascular procedures
    Sinceri, Sara
    Berchiolli, Raffaella
    Marconi, Michele
    Cioni, Roberto
    Ferrari, Vincenzo
    Ferrari, Mauro
    Moglia, Andrea
    Carbone, Marina
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 27 (06) : 315 - 320
  • [23] OR fire virtual training simulator: design and face validity
    Dorozhkin, Denis
    Olasky, Jaisa
    Jones, Daniel B.
    Schwaitzberg, Steven D.
    Jones, Stephanie B.
    Cao, Caroline G. L.
    Molina, Marcos
    Henriques, Steven
    Wang, Jinling
    Flinn, Jeff
    De, Suvranu
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (09): : 3527 - 3533
  • [24] OR fire virtual training simulator: design and face validity
    Denis Dorozhkin
    Jaisa Olasky
    Daniel B. Jones
    Steven D. Schwaitzberg
    Stephanie B. Jones
    Caroline G. L. Cao
    Marcos Molina
    Steven Henriques
    Jinling Wang
    Jeff Flinn
    Suvranu De
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 3527 - 3533
  • [25] Face, content, and construct validity of the virtual immersive operating room simulator for training laparoscopic procedures
    Fernando Pérez-Escamirosa
    Damaris Areli García-Cabra
    José Ricardo Ortiz-Hernández
    Salvador Montoya-Alvarez
    Eduardo Alfredo Ruíz-Vereo
    Ricardo Manuel Ordorica-Flores
    Arturo Minor-Martínez
    Jesús Tapia-Jurado
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 2885 - 2896
  • [26] Face, content, and construct validity of the virtual immersive operating room simulator for training laparoscopic procedures
    Perez-Escamirosa, Fernando
    Areli Garcia-Cabra, Damaris
    Ricardo Ortiz-Hernandez, Jose
    Montoya-Alvarez, Salvador
    Alfredo Ruiz-Vereo, Eduardo
    Manuel Ordorica-Flores, Ricardo
    Minor-Martinez, Arturo
    Tapia-Jurado, Jesus
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (04): : 2885 - 2896
  • [27] Construct Validity and Expert Benchmarking of the Haptic Virtual Reality Dental Simulator
    Suebnukarn, Siriwan
    Chaisombat, Monthalee
    Kongpunwijit, Thanapohn
    Rhienmora, Phattanapon
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2014, 78 (10) : 1442 - 1450
  • [28] ASSESSMENT OF FACE, CONSTRUCT AND CONTENT VALIDITY OF A NOVEL VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATOR FOR HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION OF THE PROSTATE
    Kuronen-Stewart, Cameron
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Aydin, Abdullatif
    Cynk, Mark
    Miller, Paul
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Khan, Muhammad Shamim
    Challacombe, Ben
    Popert, Rick
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E174 - E175
  • [29] A virtual reality simulator for hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization micro-inserts: the face and construct validity
    Janse, Julienne A.
    Veersema, Sebastiaan
    Broekmans, Frank J.
    Schreuder, Henk W. R.
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2013, 10 (03) : 181 - 188
  • [30] Face, Content, and Construct Validity of dV-Trainer, a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator for Robotic Surgery
    Kenney, Patrick A.
    Wszolek, Matthew F.
    Gould, Justin J.
    Libertino, John A.
    Moinzadeh, Alireza
    UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (06) : 1288 - 1292