Optimization of intensity-modulated very high energy (50-250 MeV) electron therapy

被引:43
|
作者
Yeboah, C [1 ]
Sandison, GA
Moskvin, V
机构
[1] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Med Phys, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Phys & Astron, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[3] Purdue Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2002年 / 47卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/47/8/305
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This work evaluates the potential of very high energy (50-250 MeV) electron beams for dose conformation and identifies those variables that influence optimized dose distributions for this modality. Intensity-modulated plans for a prostate cancer model were optimized as a function of the importance factors, beam energy and number of energy bins, number of beams, and the beam orientations. A trial-and-error-derived constellation of importance factors for target and sensitive structures to achieve good conformal dose distributions was 500, 50, 10 and I for the target, rectum, bladder and normal tissues respectively. Electron energies greater than 100 MeV were found to be desirable for intensity-modulated very high energy electron therapy (VHEET) of prostate cancer. Plans generated for lower energy beams had relatively poor conformal dose distributions about the target region and delivered high doses to sensitive structures. Fixed angle beam treatments utilizing a large number of fields in the range 9-21 provided acceptable plans. Using more than 21 beams at fixed gantry angles had an insignificant effect on target coverage, but resulted in an increased dose to sensitive structures and an increased normal tissue integral dose, Minor improvements in VHEET plans utilizing a 'small' number (less than or equal to9) of beams may be achieved if, in addition to intensity modulation, energy modulation is implemented using a small number (less than or equal to3) of beam energies separated by 50 to 100 MeV. Rotation therapy provided better target dose homogeneity but unfortunately resulted in increased rectal dose. bladder dose and normal tissue integral dose relative to the 21-field fixed angle treatment plan. Modulation of the beam energy for rotation therapy had no beneficial consequences on the optimized dose distributions. Lastly, selection of beam orientations influenced the optimized treatment plan even when a large number of beams (approximately 15) were employed.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1301
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of dose calculation accuracy on inverse linear energy transfer optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Chen, Mei
    Cao, Wenhua
    Yepes, Pablo
    Guan, Fada
    Poenisch, Falk
    Xu, Cheng
    Chen, Jiayi
    Li, Yupeng
    Vazquez, Ivan
    Yang, Ming
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 7 (01): : 36 - 44
  • [42] Optimization of the Irradiation Efficiency of intensity-modulated Proton Therapy Plans through prioritized Optimization
    Mueller, B. S.
    Wilkens, J. J.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 : 80 - 80
  • [43] Energy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy using protons to optimize or not to optimize?
    Fourkal, E.
    Luo, W.
    Fan, J.
    Ma, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2097 - 2097
  • [44] Energy and intensity modulated electron radiation therapy using a Monte Carlo optimization procedure
    Leal, A
    Ma, C
    du Plessis, F
    Lagares, JI
    Li, J
    Quin, L
    Xiong, W
    Stathakis, S
    Luo, W
    Chen, Z
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2070 - 2070
  • [45] Feasibility of a unified approach to intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volume-modulated arc therapy optimization and delivery
    Hoover, Douglas A.
    MacFarlane, Michael
    Wong, Eugene
    Battista, Jerry J.
    Chen, Jeff Z.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (02) : 726 - 734
  • [46] A fast inverse direct aperture optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    MacFarlane, Michael
    Hoover, Douglas A.
    Wong, Eugene
    Goldman, Pedro
    Battista, Jerry J.
    Chen, Jeff Z.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (03) : 1127 - 1139
  • [47] A robust optimization method with successive linear programming for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Tamai, Masaaki
    Yamashita, Makoto
    OPTIMIZATION, 2023, : 2347 - 2385
  • [48] Dosimetric study of beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning
    Shukla, Arvind Kumar
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    Sandhu, I. S.
    Oinam, Arun S.
    Singh, Ranjit
    Kapoor, Rakesh
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (02) : 1045 - 1049
  • [49] Inverse planning for intensity-modulated arc therapy using direct aperture optimization
    Earl, MA
    Shepard, DM
    Naqvi, S
    Li, XA
    Yu, CX
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (08): : 1075 - 1089
  • [50] Coupled Path Planning, Region Optimization, and Applications in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Chen, Danny Z.
    Luan, Shuang
    Wang, Chao
    ALGORITHMS - ESA 2008, 2008, 5193 : 271 - +