Optimization of intensity-modulated very high energy (50-250 MeV) electron therapy

被引:43
|
作者
Yeboah, C [1 ]
Sandison, GA
Moskvin, V
机构
[1] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Med Phys, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Phys & Astron, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[3] Purdue Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2002年 / 47卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/47/8/305
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This work evaluates the potential of very high energy (50-250 MeV) electron beams for dose conformation and identifies those variables that influence optimized dose distributions for this modality. Intensity-modulated plans for a prostate cancer model were optimized as a function of the importance factors, beam energy and number of energy bins, number of beams, and the beam orientations. A trial-and-error-derived constellation of importance factors for target and sensitive structures to achieve good conformal dose distributions was 500, 50, 10 and I for the target, rectum, bladder and normal tissues respectively. Electron energies greater than 100 MeV were found to be desirable for intensity-modulated very high energy electron therapy (VHEET) of prostate cancer. Plans generated for lower energy beams had relatively poor conformal dose distributions about the target region and delivered high doses to sensitive structures. Fixed angle beam treatments utilizing a large number of fields in the range 9-21 provided acceptable plans. Using more than 21 beams at fixed gantry angles had an insignificant effect on target coverage, but resulted in an increased dose to sensitive structures and an increased normal tissue integral dose, Minor improvements in VHEET plans utilizing a 'small' number (less than or equal to9) of beams may be achieved if, in addition to intensity modulation, energy modulation is implemented using a small number (less than or equal to3) of beam energies separated by 50 to 100 MeV. Rotation therapy provided better target dose homogeneity but unfortunately resulted in increased rectal dose. bladder dose and normal tissue integral dose relative to the 21-field fixed angle treatment plan. Modulation of the beam energy for rotation therapy had no beneficial consequences on the optimized dose distributions. Lastly, selection of beam orientations influenced the optimized treatment plan even when a large number of beams (approximately 15) were employed.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1301
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aperture shape optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning
    Zhang, Li-Yuan
    Gui, Zhi-Guo
    Zhang, Peng-Cheng
    Yang, Jie
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2023, 34 (09)
  • [22] An Optimization Approach for Noncoplanar Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy Trajectories
    Rocha, Humberto
    Dias, Joana
    Ventura, Tiago
    Ferreira, Brigida
    Lopes, Maria do Carmo
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2019, PT III: 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, SAINT PETERSBURG, RUSSIA, JULY 1-4, 2019, PROCEEDINGS, PART III, 2019, 11621 : 199 - 214
  • [23] Aperture shape optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning
    Li-Yuan Zhang
    Zhi-Guo Gui
    Peng-Cheng Zhang
    Jie Yang
    Nuclear Science and Techniques, 2023, 34
  • [24] Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Lee, EK
    Fox, T
    Crocker, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (01): : 301 - 320
  • [25] Unified Optimization and Delivery of Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy and Volume-modulated Arc Therapy
    Chen, J.
    MacFarlane, M.
    Wong, E.
    Hoover, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) : 24 - 24
  • [26] Optimization and clinical use of multisegment intensity-modulated radiation therapy for high-dose conformal therapy
    Fraass, BA
    Kessler, ML
    McShan, DL
    Marsh, LH
    Watson, BA
    Dusseau, WJ
    Eisbruch, A
    Sandler, HM
    Lichter, AS
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) : 60 - +
  • [27] Selective robust optimization: A new intensity-modulated proton therapy optimization strategy
    Li, Yupeng
    Niemela, Perttu
    Liao, Li
    Jiang, Shengpeng
    Li, Heng
    Poenisch, Falk
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Siljamaki, Sami
    Vanderstraeten, Reynald
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Gillin, Michael
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (08) : 4840 - 4847
  • [28] Application of optimization model with piecewise penalty to intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Guo, Caiping
    Zhang, Pengcheng
    Zhang, Liyuan
    Gui, Zhiguo
    Shu, Huazhong
    FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2018, 81 : 280 - 290
  • [29] A multiobjective beam angle optimization framework for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    de Freitas, Juliana Campos
    Cantane, Daniela Renata
    Rocha, Humberto
    Dias, Joana
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 318 (01) : 286 - 296
  • [30] Delivery of intensity-modulated electron therapy by mechanical scanning: An algorithm study
    Ma, Pan
    Tian, Yuan
    Li, Minghui
    Niu, Chuanmeng
    Song, Yuchun
    Dai, Jianrong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12