Empirical Research in Software Architecture How far have we come?

被引:9
|
作者
Galster, Matthias [1 ]
Weyns, Danny [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Comp Sci & Software Engn, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Comp Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Linnaeus Univ, Vaxjo, Sweden
关键词
software architecture; empirical research; state-of-practice; ENGINEERING RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1109/WICSA.2016.10
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Context: Empirical research helps gain well-founded insights about phenomena. Furthermore, empirical research creates evidence for the validity of research results. Objective: We aim at assessing the state-of-practice of empirical research in software architecture. Method: We conducted a comprehensive survey based on the systematic mapping method. We included all full technical research papers published at major software architecture conferences between 1999 and 2015. Results: 17% of papers report empirical work. The number of empirical studies in software architecture has started to increase in 2005. Looking at the number of papers, empirical studies are about equally frequently used to a) evaluate newly proposed approaches and b) to explore and describe phenomena to better understand software architecture practice. Case studies and experiments are the most frequently used empirical methods. Almost half of empirical studies involve human participants. The majority of these studies involve professionals rather than students. Conclusions: Our findings are meant to stimulate researchers in the community to think about their expectations and standards of empirical research. Our results indicate that software architecture has become a more mature domain with regards to applying empirical research. However, we also found issues in research practices that could be improved (e.g., when describing study objectives and acknowledging limitations).
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 20
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Milestones in Heart Failure: How Far We Have Come and How Far We Have Left to Go
    Gajjela, Harini
    Kela, Iljena
    Kakarala, Chandra L.
    Hassan, Mohammad
    Belavadi, Rishab
    Gudigopuram, Sri Vallabh Reddy
    Raguthu, Ciri C.
    Modi, Srimy
    Sange, Ibrahim
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [32] Electronic health records: How far have we come? How far do we have to go?
    Waegemann, CP
    [J]. TOWARD AN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD EUROPE '97 - CONFERENCE ON THE CREATION OF A EUROPEAN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 8 - 10
  • [33] DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION: HOW FAR HAVE WE COME? HOW FAR CAN WE GO?
    Pennington, Greg
    [J]. CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY JOURNAL-PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2020, 72 (04) : 324 - 331
  • [34] Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation How Far Have We Come?
    Whitcomb, John J.
    Blackman, Virginia Schmied
    [J]. DIMENSIONS OF CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2007, 26 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [35] Tracheobronchomalacia treatment: how far have we come?
    Lopez-Padilla, Daniel
    Garcia-Lujan, Ricardo
    Puente Maestu, Luis
    de Miguel Poch, Eduardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (12) : 3490 - 3493
  • [36] In vitro oogenesis: How far have we come?
    Arkoun, B.
    Livera, G.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2018, 46 (01): : 41 - 46
  • [37] Immunotherapy in myeloma: how far have we come?
    Franssen, Laurens E.
    Mutis, Tuna
    Lokhorst, Henk M.
    van de Donk, Niels W. C. J.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY, 2019, 10 : 1 - 19
  • [38] Pain Catastrophizing: How Far Have We Come
    Simic, Katarina
    Savic, Boris
    Knezevic, Nebojsa Nick
    [J]. NEUROLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 16 (03): : 483 - 501
  • [39] HOW FAR HAVE WE COME + GREAT TRIALS
    PORTER, CM
    [J]. PROTEUS, 1996, 13 (01) : R7 - R8
  • [40] CARDIAC RETRANSPLANTATION: HOW FAR HAVE WE COME?
    DePasquale, Eugene Christopher
    Cheng, Richard
    Nsair, Ali
    Reardon, Leigh
    Baas, Arnold
    Cadeiras, Martin
    Cruz, Daniel
    Halnon, Nancy
    Alejos, Juan
    Deng, Mario
    Laks, Hillel
    Ardehali, Abbas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A807 - A807