Evaluation of a revised version of computer-assisted diagnosis system, BONENAVI version 2.1.7, for bone scintigraphy in cancer patients

被引:20
|
作者
Koizumi, Mitsuru [1 ]
Miyaji, Noriaki [1 ]
Murata, Taisuke [1 ]
Motegi, Kazuki [1 ]
Miwa, Kenta [1 ]
Koyama, Masamichi [1 ]
Terauchi, Takashi [1 ]
Wagatsuma, Kei [2 ]
Kawakami, Kazunori [3 ]
Richter, Jens [4 ]
机构
[1] Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
[2] Tokyo Metropolitan Inst Gerontol, Res Team Neuroimaging, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1730015, Japan
[3] Fujifilm RI Pharma Co Ltd, Chuo Ku, Tokyo 1040031, Japan
[4] EXINI Diagnost AB, S-22370 Lund, Sweden
关键词
Bone scan; Skeletal metastasis; Computer-aided diagnosis; BONENAVI version 2.1.7; PROSTATE-CANCER; SCAN;
D O I
10.1007/s12149-015-0988-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BONENAVI is a computer-assisted diagnosis system that analyzes bone scintigraphy automatically. We experienced more than a few segmentation errors with the previous BONENAVI version (2.0.5). We have since obtained a revised version (2.1.7) and evaluate it. Bone scans of patients were analyzed by BONENAVI version 2.0.5 and a revised version 2.1.7 with regard to segmentation errors, sensitivity, and specificity. Patients with skeletal metastases from prostate cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, and other cancers were included in the study as true-positive cases. Patients with no skeletal metastasis (regardless of hot spots), and patients with abnormal bone scans but no skeletal metastasis were included as negative cases. Bone-scan patients were subjected to artificial neural network (ANN) evaluation. Values equal to or above 0.5 were regarded as positive, and those below 0.5 as negative. The patients whose clinical status did not correspond to their ANN scores were assessed for any similarities. The frequency of segmentation errors was statistically significantly reduced when using BONENAVI version 2.1.7. The differences in sensitivity and specificity for the results of version 2.0.5 versus version 2.1.7 were not different, giving a high Cohen's kappa coefficient. In the patients who showed an increased ANN value with version 2.1.7, a few false-positive thoracic lesions were identified. Patients whose ANN value was significantly high with version 2.0.5 showed no tendencies. Revised BONENAVI version 2.1.7 for bone scintigraphy was superior with regard to segmentation errors. However, its sensitivity and specificity were similar to those of version 2.0.5. The false-positive identification of thoracic lesions in revised version 2.1.7 might be subject to remedy.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 665
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comprehensive Computer-Assisted Diagnosis System for Early Assessment of Renal Cancer Tumors
    Shehata, Mohamed
    Alksas, Ahmed
    Abouelkheir, Rasha T.
    Elmahdy, Ahmed
    Shaffie, Ahmed
    Soliman, Ahmed
    Ghazal, Mohammed
    Abu Khalifeh, Hadil
    Salim, Reem
    Abdel Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek
    Alghamdi, Norah Saleh
    El-Baz, Ayman
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (14)
  • [22] COMPUTER-ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS OF DYSPEPSIA - REPORT ON TRANSFERABILITY OF A SYSTEM, WITH EMPHASIS ON EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRIC CANCER
    ZOLTIE, N
    HORROCKS, JC
    DEDOMBAL, FT
    METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 1977, 16 (02) : 89 - 92
  • [23] Computer-Assisted Diagnosis System for Breast Cancer in Computed Tomography Laser Mammography (CTLM)
    Afsaneh Jalalian
    Syamsiah Mashohor
    Rozi Mahmud
    Babak Karasfi
    M. Iqbal Saripan
    Abdul Rahman Ramli
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2017, 30 : 796 - 811
  • [24] Computer-Assisted Diagnosis System for Breast Cancer in Computed Tomography Laser Mammography (CTLM)
    Jalalian, Afsaneh
    Mashohor, Syamsiah
    Mahmud, Rozi
    Karasfi, Babak
    Saripan, M. Iqbal
    Ramli, Abdul Rahman
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2017, 30 (06) : 796 - 811
  • [25] Tooth Wear Evaluation System (TWES) 2.0-Reliability of diagnosis with and without computer-assisted evaluation
    Roehl, Jakob C.
    Jakstat, Holger A.
    Becker, Kai
    Wetselaar, Peter
    Ahlers, M. Oliver
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 49 (01) : 81 - 91
  • [26] The Chinese version of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale for gynaecological cancer patients and their partners: Translation and psychometric evaluation
    Li, Minjie
    Chan, Carmen W. H.
    Choi, Kai Chow
    Zhang, Hui
    Ng, Shek Nam
    Huang, Lina
    Zhang, Mengyue
    Zhao, Wenqian
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2022, 9 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [27] Novel computer-assisted diagnosis system for endoscopic disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis
    Ozawa, Tsuyoshi
    Ishihara, Soichiro
    Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
    Saito, Hiroaki
    Kumagai, Youichi
    Shichijo, Satoki
    Aoyama, Kazuharu
    Tada, Tomohiro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (02) : 416 - +
  • [28] Evaluation of HepatoConsult, a computer-assisted expert system for the diagnosis of liver disease:: preliminary results and trends
    Buscher, HP
    Führer, A
    Kirschke, S
    Galland, D
    Spangenberg, HC
    Blum, HE
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1999, 124 (34-35) : 989 - 992
  • [29] In vitro evaluation of a computer-assisted decision support system for the primary care of polytrauma patients
    Vogel, Christoph
    Neumann, Juliane
    Kiessling, Lisa
    Hempel, Gunther
    Neumuth, Thomas
    Kleber, Christian
    Osterhoff, Georg
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2023, 49 (05) : 2187 - 2192
  • [30] In vitro evaluation of a computer-assisted decision support system for the primary care of polytrauma patients
    Christoph Vogel
    Juliane Neumann
    Lisa Kießling
    Gunther Hempel
    Thomas Neumuth
    Christian Kleber
    Georg Osterhoff
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2023, 49 : 2187 - 2192