Gleason pattern 5 is the strongest pathologic predictor of recurrence, metastasis, and prostate cancer-specific death in patients receiving salvage radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy

被引:44
|
作者
Jackson, William [1 ]
Hamstra, Daniel A. [1 ]
Johnson, Skyler [1 ]
Zhou, Jessica [1 ]
Foster, Benjamin [1 ]
Foster, Corey [1 ]
Li, Darren [1 ]
Song, Yeohan [1 ]
Palapattu, Ganesh S. [2 ]
Kunju, Lakshmi P. [3 ]
Mehra, Rohit [3 ]
Feng, Felix Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Pathol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Gleason pattern; prostate cancer; salvage radiation therapy; outcomes; prognosis; BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; PROGRESSION; MORTALITY; INTERVAL; SCORE;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.28215
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The presence of Gleason pattern 5 (GP5) at radical prostatectomy (RP) has been associated with worse clinical outcome; however, this pathologic variable has not been assessed in patients receiving salvage radiation therapy (SRT) after a rising prostate-specific antigen level. METHODS A total of 575 patients who underwent primary RP for localized prostate cancer and subsequently received SRT at a tertiary medical institution were reviewed retrospectively. Primary outcomes of interest were biochemical failure (BF), distant metastasis (DM), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), which were assessed via univariate analysis and Fine and Grays competing risks multivariate models. RESULTS On pathologic evaluation, 563 (98%) patients had a documented Gleason score (GS). The median follow-up post-SRT was 56.7 months. A total of 60 (10.7%) patients had primary, secondary, or tertiary GP5. On univariate analysis, the presence of GP5 was prognostic for BF (hazard ratio [HR] 3.3; P<.0001), DM (HR:11.1, P<.0001), and PCSM (HR:8.8, P<.0001). Restratification of the Gleason score to include GP5 as a distinct entity resulted in improved prognostic capability. Patients with GP5 had clinically worse outcomes than patients with GS8(4+4). On multivariate analysis, the presence of GP5 was the most adverse pathologic predictor of BF (HR 2.9; P<.0001), DM (HR 14.8; P<.0001), and PCSM (HR 5.7; P<.0001). CONCLUSION In the setting of SRT for prostate cancer, the presence of GP5 is a critical pathologic predictor of BF, DM, and PCSM. Traditional GS risk stratification fails to fully utilize the prognostic capabilities of individual Gleason patterns among men receiving SRT post-RP. Cancer 2013;119:3287-94. (c) 2013 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3287 / 3294
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE RISK OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN RECEIVING TESTOSTERONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Rust, Jo
    Pereira, Ta
    Smith, R.
    Boris, R.
    Egemba, C.
    Green, J.
    Koch, M.
    Laniak, L.
    Bahler, C.
    Beneth Iv, R.
    Spio, M.
    Bernie, Hl
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21
  • [42] Predictive factors of radiation therapy for patients with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    de la Taille, A
    Flam, TA
    Thiounn, N
    Pontvert, D
    Saighi, D
    Zerbib, M
    Debré, B
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (09) : 887 - 892
  • [43] Predictors of Recurrence After Metastasis-directed Therapy in Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy
    Milenkovic, Uros
    Kuijk, Joke
    Roussel, Eduard
    Devos, Gaetan
    Van den Broeck, Thomas
    Van Eecke, Henri
    Vanderstichele, Arthur
    Duvillier, Thibault
    Verhamme, Lieven
    Van Haute, Wim
    Goeman, Lieven
    Berghen, Charlien
    Joniau, Steven
    De Meerleer, Gert
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2023, 6 (06): : 582 - 589
  • [44] Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy Following Radical Prostatectomy for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer
    Dess, Robert T.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Mehra, Rohit
    Sandler, Howard M.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (07)
  • [45] Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy Following Radical Prostatectomy for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer
    Robert T. Dess
    Todd M. Morgan
    Paul L. Nguyen
    Rohit Mehra
    Howard M. Sandler
    Felix Y. Feng
    Daniel E. Spratt
    Current Urology Reports, 2017, 18
  • [46] Adjuvant vs Salvage Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy
    MacDuffie, Emily
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (08) : 1165 - 1166
  • [47] Topography of Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radiation Therapy: A Detailed Mapping Study of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Takeda, Toshikazu
    Tin, Amy L.
    Corradi, Renato B.
    Mamoor, Maha
    Benfante, Nicole E.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    Fine, Samson W.
    Touijer, Karim A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (04) : 488 - 490
  • [48] Prostate-Specific Antigen Level at the Time of Salvage Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Death
    Tilki, Derya
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Wu, Jing
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Mohamad, Osama
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (13) : 2428 - +
  • [49] Cancer-specific Survival After Metastasis Following Primary Radical Prostatectomy Compared with Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients: Results of a Population-based, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Shao, Yu-Hsuan Joni
    Kim, Sung
    Moore, Dirk F.
    Shih, Weichung
    Lin, Yong
    Stein, Mark
    Kim, Isaac Yi
    Lu-Yao, Grace L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (04) : 693 - 700
  • [50] Cancer-specific survival following radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients: A multi-trial cohort analysis
    Righetto, M.
    Fulcoli, V
    Modonutti, D.
    Costa, G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S359 - S359