Gleason pattern 5 is the strongest pathologic predictor of recurrence, metastasis, and prostate cancer-specific death in patients receiving salvage radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy

被引:44
|
作者
Jackson, William [1 ]
Hamstra, Daniel A. [1 ]
Johnson, Skyler [1 ]
Zhou, Jessica [1 ]
Foster, Benjamin [1 ]
Foster, Corey [1 ]
Li, Darren [1 ]
Song, Yeohan [1 ]
Palapattu, Ganesh S. [2 ]
Kunju, Lakshmi P. [3 ]
Mehra, Rohit [3 ]
Feng, Felix Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Pathol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Gleason pattern; prostate cancer; salvage radiation therapy; outcomes; prognosis; BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; PROGRESSION; MORTALITY; INTERVAL; SCORE;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.28215
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The presence of Gleason pattern 5 (GP5) at radical prostatectomy (RP) has been associated with worse clinical outcome; however, this pathologic variable has not been assessed in patients receiving salvage radiation therapy (SRT) after a rising prostate-specific antigen level. METHODS A total of 575 patients who underwent primary RP for localized prostate cancer and subsequently received SRT at a tertiary medical institution were reviewed retrospectively. Primary outcomes of interest were biochemical failure (BF), distant metastasis (DM), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), which were assessed via univariate analysis and Fine and Grays competing risks multivariate models. RESULTS On pathologic evaluation, 563 (98%) patients had a documented Gleason score (GS). The median follow-up post-SRT was 56.7 months. A total of 60 (10.7%) patients had primary, secondary, or tertiary GP5. On univariate analysis, the presence of GP5 was prognostic for BF (hazard ratio [HR] 3.3; P<.0001), DM (HR:11.1, P<.0001), and PCSM (HR:8.8, P<.0001). Restratification of the Gleason score to include GP5 as a distinct entity resulted in improved prognostic capability. Patients with GP5 had clinically worse outcomes than patients with GS8(4+4). On multivariate analysis, the presence of GP5 was the most adverse pathologic predictor of BF (HR 2.9; P<.0001), DM (HR 14.8; P<.0001), and PCSM (HR 5.7; P<.0001). CONCLUSION In the setting of SRT for prostate cancer, the presence of GP5 is a critical pathologic predictor of BF, DM, and PCSM. Traditional GS risk stratification fails to fully utilize the prognostic capabilities of individual Gleason patterns among men receiving SRT post-RP. Cancer 2013;119:3287-94. (c) 2013 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3287 / 3294
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Surrogate end point for prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy
    D'Amico, AV
    Moul, JW
    Carroll, PR
    Sun, L
    Lubeck, D
    Chen, MH
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (18) : 1376 - 1383
  • [32] Prediction of response to salvage radiation therapy in patients with prostrate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Leventis, AK
    Shariat, SF
    Kattan, MW
    Butler, EB
    Wheeler, TM
    Slawin, KM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) : 1030 - 1039
  • [33] Phase 1 Trial of Everolimus and Radiation Therapy for Salvage Treatment of Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients Following Prostatectomy
    Narayan, Vivek
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Mick, Rosemarie
    Subramanian, Pearl
    Christodouleas, John P.
    Bekelman, Justin E.
    Deville, Curtiland
    Rajendran, Ramji
    Haas, Naomi B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 97 (02): : 355 - 361
  • [34] Quantitative gene expression in primary and highest Gleason pattern cancer specimens identifies genes associated with clinical recurrence and prostate cancer-specific survival after radical prostatectomy
    Klein, E. A.
    Falzarano, S. M.
    Maddala, T.
    Lee, M.
    Pelham, R. J.
    Novotny, W. F.
    Shak, S.
    Magi-Galluzzi, C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [35] Time to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy is an important predictor of clinical progression, distant metastases and cancer-specific death
    Veliev, E. I.
    Sokolov, E. A.
    Loran, O. B.
    Petrov, S. B.
    Lukyanov, I. V.
    Seregin, A. V.
    Bogdanov, A. B.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2014, 10 (03): : 59 - 63
  • [36] BIOPSY KI-67 IS A STRONG PREDICTOR OF SYSTEMIC PROGRESSION AND CANCER-SPECIFIC DEATH FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Tollefson, Matthew
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Blute, Michael
    Rangel, Laureano
    Bergstralh, Eric
    Kipp, Ben
    Sebo, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E794 - E794
  • [37] Long-term results of radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy
    Lange, PH
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (01): : 177 - 178
  • [39] Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality Following Salvage Post-Prostatectomy Radiation Therapy: A Competition Between Age and Time to Biochemical Failure
    Jackson, W. C.
    Suresh, K.
    Tumati, V.
    Dess, R. T.
    Soni, P. D.
    Zhao, S. G.
    Zumsteg, Z. S.
    Hannan, R.
    Hollenbeck, B.
    George, A.
    Kaffenberger, S.
    Salami, S.
    Hearn, J. W. D.
    Jolly, S.
    Morgan, T. M.
    Mehra, R.
    Schipper, M.
    Feng, F. Y.
    Desai, N. B.
    Spratt, D. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E120 - E121