Randomized trial of mifepristone and buccal or vaginal misoprostol for abortion through 56 days of last menstrual period

被引:49
|
作者
Middleton, T
Schaff, E [1 ]
Fielding, SL
Scahill, M
Shannon, C
Westheimer, E
Wilkinson, T
Winikoff, B
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Rochester, NY 14620 USA
[2] Gynu Hlth Projects, New York, NY 10010 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37215 USA
关键词
randomized trials; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; buccal administration; early pregnancy;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.017
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion has been approved in the United States since 2000. U.S. providers have preferred to use vaginal misoprostol because of evidence that such a regimen is more effective in later gestations. Buccal administration of misoprostol may be equally effective and more acceptable to some women. Methods: This open-label, randomized trial was conducted at two sites in Rochester, NY, and involved healthy women with pregnancies through 56 days since the last menstrual period (LMP) as indicated by sonogram. Women received mifepristone 200 mg orally and were randomized to use 800 mu g of misoprostol either buccally or vaginally 1 to 2 days later. They returned within 15 days for repeat sonogram. If the woman's pregnancy had not been completely aborted by day 36, a suction abortion was performed. The primary outcome was a complete abortion without surgical intervention. Results: Four hundred forty-two women were enrolled in the study, and complete data were available on 429. The efficacy rate was 95% (205/216) in the buccal group and 93% (199/213) in the vaginal group (chi(2) = 0.43, p = .51). Nausea was the most commonly reported side effect, affecting 70% in the buccal group and 62% in the vaginal group. There were no differences in the satisfaction with the overall procedure between the buccal (92%) and the vaginal groups (95%) (chi(2) = 1.87, p = .17). Conclusion: Buccal administration of misoprostol after low-dose mifepristone for medical abortion appears to be a highly effective and acceptable alternative compared with vaginal administration for medical abortion in pregnancies through 56 days LMP. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 332
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Two Distinct Oral Routes of Misoprostol in Mifepristone Medical Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Winikoff, Beverly
    Dzuba, Ilana G.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Crowden, William A.
    Goldberg, Alisa A.
    Gonzales, Juliana
    Howe, Michelle
    Moskowitz, Jeffrey
    Prine, Linda
    Shannon, Caitlin S.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (06): : 1303 - 1310
  • [32] Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol or Ethacridine Lactate and Oxytocin for Second Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Trial
    Dadhwal, Vatsla
    Garimella, Sita
    Khoiwal, Kavita
    Sharma, K. Aparna
    Perumal, Vanamail
    Deka, Dipika
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (03): : 262 - 266
  • [33] Mifepristone followed by home administration of buccal misoprostol for medical abortion up to 70 days of amenorrhoea in a general practice in Curacao
    Boersma, Adriana A.
    Jong, Betty Meyboom-de
    Kleiverda, Gunilla
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2011, 16 (02): : 61 - 66
  • [34] MEDICAL ABORTION WITH MISOPROSTOL ONLY VS. MIFEPRISTONE PLUS MISOPROSTOL: RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Ngoc, N. T.
    Nga, N. T.
    Raghavan, S.
    Winikoff, B.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 80 (02) : 195 - 195
  • [35] Buccal misoprostol to decrease blood loss after vaginal delivery: A randomized trial
    Bhullar, A
    Carlan, SJ
    Hamm, M
    Lamberty, N
    White, L
    Richichi, K
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (06): : 1282 - 1288
  • [36] Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Buccal Misoprostol for Termination of Second-Trimester Pregnancy A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Al, Ragip A.
    Yapca, Omer E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (03): : 593 - 598
  • [37] Vaginal vs. sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone for cervical priming in second-trimester abortion by dilation and evacuation: a randomized clinical trial
    Carbonell, Josep Lluis
    Gallego, Francisca Garcia
    Llorente, Margardell Perez
    Bermudez, Santiago Barambio
    Sala, Eugenia Sanchez
    Gonzalez, Lidia Varela
    Texido, Carlos Sanchez
    CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (03) : 230 - 237
  • [38] Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Combined with a Foley Catheter (BEGIN Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gomez, Helen B.
    Hoffman, Matthew
    Caplan, Richard
    Young, Matthew H.
    Ruhstaller, Kelly
    Sciscione, Anthony
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S34 - S34
  • [39] Randomized trial of oral versus sublingual misoprostol 24 h after mifepristone for medical abortion
    Krishna Dahiya
    Sonika Mann
    Smiti Nanda
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 284 : 59 - 63
  • [40] Mifepristone and misoprostol administered simultaneously versus 24 hours apart for abortion - A Randomized controlled trial
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Schreiber, Courtney A.
    Bednarek, Paula
    Lintu, Hanna
    Wagner, Marie-Soleil
    Meyn, Leslie A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04): : 885 - 894