Mifepristone and misoprostol administered simultaneously versus 24 hours apart for abortion - A Randomized controlled trial

被引:85
|
作者
Creinin, Mitchell D.
Schreiber, Courtney A.
Bednarek, Paula
Lintu, Hanna
Wagner, Marie-Soleil
Meyn, Leslie A.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portland, OR USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Magee Womens Res Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2007年 / 109卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000258298.35143.d2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Mifepristone and oral misoprostol are typically used for medical abortion in women up to 49 days of gestation, with a 36- to 48-hour interval between the medications. Alternative routes of misoprostol administration allow for use beyond 49 days of gestation. We designed this randomized, noninferiority trial to compare the efficacy, adverse effects, and acceptability of misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally administered simultaneously with, or 24 hours after, mifepristone 200 mg orally for abortion in women up to 63 days of gestation. METHODS: The 1,128 participants swallowed mifepristone 200 mg and were then randomized to self-administer misoprostol intravaginally immediately in the office (group 1) or 24 hours later at home (group 2). Subjects returned for an evaluation, including transvaginal ultrasonography, 7 +/- 1 days after initiating treatment. Women who had not aborted were offered a second dose of misoprostol and returned for another evaluation in approximately 1 week. A phone contact was also attempted approximately 5 weeks after treatment. Treatment was considered a failure if a suction aspiration was performed for any indication. RESULTS: The complete abortion rate for group 1 (95.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 93.0-96.8%) was statistically noninferior to that for group 2 (96.9%, 95% CI 95.1-98.2%) (P=.003). The abortion rates between groups did not significantly differ by gestational age. Adverse effects were mostly similar, although nausea, diarrhea, and warmth or chills were significantly more common in group 1. CONCLUSION: Mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally used simultaneously is as effective for abortion as compared with regimens using a 24-hour dosing interval. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00269568.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 894
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion
    Creinin, MD
    Fox, MC
    Teal, S
    Chen, A
    Schaff, EA
    Meyn, LA
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (05): : 851 - 859
  • [2] Randomized trial of oral versus sublingual misoprostol 24 h after mifepristone for medical abortion
    Krishna Dahiya
    Sonika Mann
    Smiti Nanda
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 284 : 59 - 63
  • [3] Randomized trial of oral versus sublingual misoprostol 24 h after mifepristone for medical abortion
    Dahiya, Krishna
    Mann, Sonika
    Nanda, Smiti
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 284 (01) : 59 - 63
  • [4] Oral mifepristone and buccal misoprostol administered simultaneously for abortion: a pilot study
    Lohr, Patricia A.
    Reeves, Matthew F.
    Hayes, Jennifer L.
    Harwood, Bryna
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 76 (03) : 215 - 220
  • [5] Mifepristone and sublingual misoprostol versus sublingual misoprostol alone for missed abortion: Results of a randomized placebo-controlled trial
    Bracken, H.
    Zuberi, N.
    de Guevara Puerto, A. L.
    Mayi-Tsonga, S.
    Buendia Gomez, M.
    Ahmed, Irfan S.
    Minkobame, U.
    Perrin, R. X.
    Diop, A.
    Abbas, D.
    Pena, M.
    Winikoff, B.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 99 (05) : 315 - 316
  • [6] A randomized controlled trial of different buccal misoprostol doses in mifepristone medical abortion
    Chong, Erica
    Tsereteli, Tamar
    Nhu Ngoc Thi Nguyen
    Winikoff, Beverly
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (03) : 251 - 256
  • [7] Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol or Oxytocin for Second-Trimester Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Elami-Suzin, Matan
    Freeman, Martine D.
    Porat, Nurit
    Rojansky, Nathan
    Laufer, Neri
    Ben-Meir, Assaf
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (04): : 815 - 820
  • [8] Two Distinct Oral Routes of Misoprostol in Mifepristone Medical Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Winikoff, Beverly
    Dzuba, Ilana G.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Crowden, William A.
    Goldberg, Alisa A.
    Gonzales, Juliana
    Howe, Michelle
    Moskowitz, Jeffrey
    Prine, Linda
    Shannon, Caitlin S.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (06): : 1303 - 1310
  • [9] Mifepristone and misoprostol versus dilation and evacuation for midtrimester abortion:: a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Grimes, DA
    Smith, MS
    Witham, AD
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (02) : 148 - 153
  • [10] Mifepristone followed in 24 hours to 48 hours by misoprostol for late first-trimester abortion
    Bracken, Hillary
    Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Nhu
    Schaff, Eric
    Coyaji, Kurus
    Ambardekar, Shubha
    Westheimer, Emily
    Winikoff, Beverly
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04): : 895 - 901