Mifepristone and misoprostol administered simultaneously versus 24 hours apart for abortion - A Randomized controlled trial

被引:85
|
作者
Creinin, Mitchell D.
Schreiber, Courtney A.
Bednarek, Paula
Lintu, Hanna
Wagner, Marie-Soleil
Meyn, Leslie A.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portland, OR USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Magee Womens Res Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2007年 / 109卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000258298.35143.d2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Mifepristone and oral misoprostol are typically used for medical abortion in women up to 49 days of gestation, with a 36- to 48-hour interval between the medications. Alternative routes of misoprostol administration allow for use beyond 49 days of gestation. We designed this randomized, noninferiority trial to compare the efficacy, adverse effects, and acceptability of misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally administered simultaneously with, or 24 hours after, mifepristone 200 mg orally for abortion in women up to 63 days of gestation. METHODS: The 1,128 participants swallowed mifepristone 200 mg and were then randomized to self-administer misoprostol intravaginally immediately in the office (group 1) or 24 hours later at home (group 2). Subjects returned for an evaluation, including transvaginal ultrasonography, 7 +/- 1 days after initiating treatment. Women who had not aborted were offered a second dose of misoprostol and returned for another evaluation in approximately 1 week. A phone contact was also attempted approximately 5 weeks after treatment. Treatment was considered a failure if a suction aspiration was performed for any indication. RESULTS: The complete abortion rate for group 1 (95.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 93.0-96.8%) was statistically noninferior to that for group 2 (96.9%, 95% CI 95.1-98.2%) (P=.003). The abortion rates between groups did not significantly differ by gestational age. Adverse effects were mostly similar, although nausea, diarrhea, and warmth or chills were significantly more common in group 1. CONCLUSION: Mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally used simultaneously is as effective for abortion as compared with regimens using a 24-hour dosing interval. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00269568.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 894
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A randomised controlled trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation
    Hamoda, H
    Ashok, PW
    Flett, GMM
    Templeton, A
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (08) : 1102 - 1108
  • [22] 24-Hour Compared With 12-Hour Mifepristone-Misoprostol Interval for Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Meyer, Raanan
    Toussia-Cohen, Shlomi
    Shats, Maya
    Segal, Omri
    Blumenthal, Paul D.
    Mashiach, Roy
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 143 (5S): : 3S - 3S
  • [23] Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Low-Dose Mifepristone and Self-Administered Misoprostol for Ultra-Early Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Cui-Lan Li
    Li-Ping Song
    Shi-Yan Tang
    Lee Jaden Gil Yu-Kang Zhou
    Hong He
    Xue-Tang Mo
    Yi-Ming Liao
    [J]. Reproductive Sciences, 2017, 24 : 731 - 737
  • [24] Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Low-Dose Mifepristone and Self-Administered Misoprostol for Ultra-Early Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Li, Cui-Lan
    Song, Li-Ping
    Tang, Shi-Yan
    Zhou, Lee Jaden Gil Yu-Kang
    He, Hong
    Mo, Xue-Tang
    Liao, Yi-Ming
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 24 (05) : 731 - 737
  • [25] Mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical ripening in surgical abortion between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial
    Ohannessian, Alexandra
    Baumstarck, Karine
    Maruani, Julia
    Cohen-Solal, Emmanuelle
    Auquier, Pascal
    Agostini, Aubert
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 201 : 151 - 155
  • [26] Medical abortion by mifepristone with oral versus vaginal misoprostol
    Jyothi, Shetty
    Pallavi, M. N. V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2006, 56 (06): : 529 - 531
  • [27] A randomized controlled trial of laminaria, oral misoprostol, and vaginal misoprostol before abortion
    Sperling, AL
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (04): : 637 - 637
  • [28] A randomized controlled trial of laminaria, oral misoprostol, and vaginal misoprostol before abortion
    MacIsaac, L
    Grossman, D
    Balistreri, E
    Darney, P
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (05): : 766 - 770
  • [29] METHOTREXATE AND MISOPROSTOL VS MISOPROSTOL ALONE FOR EARLY ABORTION - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    CREININ, MD
    VITTINGHOFF, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (15): : 1190 - 1195
  • [30] Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol or Ethacridine Lactate and Oxytocin for Second Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Trial
    Dadhwal, Vatsla
    Garimella, Sita
    Khoiwal, Kavita
    Sharma, K. Aparna
    Perumal, Vanamail
    Deka, Dipika
    [J]. EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (03): : 262 - 266