Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching

被引:12
|
作者
Park, Dong Soo [1 ]
Kim, Ji Won [1 ]
Chang, Eun Mi [1 ]
Lee, Woo Sik [1 ]
Yoon, Tae Ki [1 ]
Lyu, Sang Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] CHA Univ, Fertil Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med,CHA Gangnam Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
blastocyst; embryo transfer; in vitrofertilization; day 5 blastocyst transfer; day 6 blastocyst transfer; delayed blastulation; live birth rate; pregnancy outcome; THAWED EMBRYO-TRANSFER; LIVE-BIRTH-RATES; PREGNANCY RATE; IMPLANTATION; SINGLE; ENDOMETRIUM; CULTURE; QUALITY; CYCLES; VITRIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2020.00499
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Despite the large number of studies on blastocyst transfers, it is unclear whether day 6 blastocysts have similar pregnancy rates and safety with day 5 blastocysts. Thus, this study aimed to compare the obstetric, neonatal, and clinical outcomes of day 5 and day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfers (VBT). In this retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching, we evaluated 1,313 cycles of VBT performed between January 2014 and December 2015 at the Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center. All cycles underwent natural endometrial preparation. We used propensity score matching to compare day 5 and day 6 VBTs in a matched comparison. After propensity score matching, there were 465 cycles of day 5 VBT and 155 cycles of day 6 VBT. Implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and live birth rate (LBR) were significantly lower in day 6 VBTs (44.2 vs. 53.1%,p= 0.023; 48.4 vs. 60.4%,p= 0.009; 33.5 vs. 51.8%,p< 0.001). Miscarriage rate was significantly higher in day 6 VBTs (29.3 vs. 10.7%,p< 0.001). Rate of multiple gestations was similar between the two groups (29.3 vs. 30.2%,p= 0.816). Assessing 241 and 52 babies from day 5 and day 6 VBTs, no differences were found in neonatal outcomes including rates of low birth weight, preterm birth, and congenital malformations. In propensity score-matched analysis, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes between day 5 and day 6 VBTs were similar so that day 6 VBTs are as safe as day 5 VBTs. IR, CPR, and LBR were are all significantly lower in day 6 VBTs. Therefore, if there are no differences in the morphological grade between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts, transfer of day 5 vitrified blastocysts should be considered first.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of clinical outcomes between day 5 early-middle expanding blastocysts (E-MB) versus day 6 fully expanded-hatched blastocysts (F-HB) transfer in vitrified-warmed cycles
    Lee, S. K.
    Cha, J. H.
    Shin, S. H.
    Kim, Y. J.
    Kim, J. H.
    Kim, D. H.
    Kim, H. Y.
    Ahn, J. H.
    Kim, H. Y.
    Pak, K. A.
    Yoon, J. S.
    Park, S. Y.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 226 - 227
  • [42] Laser-assisted hatching on clinical and neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing single vitrified Blastocyst transfer: A propensity score-matched study
    Endo, Yuji
    Mitsuhata, Shingo
    Hayashi, Momoko
    Fujii, Yoshitaka
    Motoyama, Hiroaki
    REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 20 (02) : 182 - 189
  • [43] Clinical outcomes for Day 3 double cleavage-stage embryo transfers versus Day 5 or 6 single blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles: a retrospective comparative analysis
    Rao, Jinpeng
    Qiu, Feng
    Tian, Shen
    Yu, Ya
    Zhang, Ying
    Gu, Zheng
    Cai, Yiting
    Jin, Fan
    Jin, Min
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (12)
  • [44] Correlation between an annotation-free embryo scoring system based on deep learning and live birth/neonatal outcomes after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: a single-centre, large-cohort retrospective study
    Ueno, Satoshi
    Berntsen, Jorgen
    Ito, Motoki
    Okimura, Tadashi
    Kato, Keiichi
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2022, 39 (09) : 2089 - 2099
  • [45] Association of Xuebijing treatment with clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching
    Gao Suyu
    Zhang, Meng
    Sun, Feng
    Cheng, Hong
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 32 : 199 - 199
  • [46] Correlation between an annotation-free embryo scoring system based on deep learning and live birth/neonatal outcomes after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: a single-centre, large-cohort retrospective study
    Satoshi Ueno
    Jørgen Berntsen
    Motoki Ito
    Tadashi Okimura
    Keiichi Kato
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 2089 - 2099
  • [47] Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between 4th day morula and 5th day blastocyst after embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study
    Sun, Yiqun
    Shen, Qi
    Xi, Haitao
    Sui, Liucai
    Fu, Yanghua
    Zhao, Junzhao
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [48] Effect of day 5 or 6 blastocyst embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in euthyroid women undergoing IVF: A single centre retrospective cohort
    Negreiros, Ricardo Andre Medeiros
    d'Assuncao, Viviane Rosado Negreiros
    d'Assuncao, Luis Eduardo Negreiros
    Caldas, Maria Madalena Pessoa
    Sousa, Eduardo Sergio Soares
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2024, 28 (04): : 535 - 542
  • [49] Correction to: Correlation between an annotation-free embryo scoring system based on deep learning and live birth/neonatal outcomes after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: a single-centre, large-cohort retrospective study
    Satoshi Ueno
    Jørgen Berntsen
    Motoki Ito
    Tadashi Okimura
    Keiichi Kato
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 2101 - 2101
  • [50] Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by placental abruption with vs. without supporting sonographic findings- A retrospective cohort study
    Mor, Liat
    Erteschik, Naama
    Gandelsman, Erika
    Vartkova, Anna
    Kleiner, Ilia
    Barda, Giulia
    Gindes, Liat
    Schreiber, Letizia
    Weiner, Eran
    Gonen, Noa
    PLACENTA, 2024, 156 : 14 - 19