Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching

被引:12
|
作者
Park, Dong Soo [1 ]
Kim, Ji Won [1 ]
Chang, Eun Mi [1 ]
Lee, Woo Sik [1 ]
Yoon, Tae Ki [1 ]
Lyu, Sang Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] CHA Univ, Fertil Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med,CHA Gangnam Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
blastocyst; embryo transfer; in vitrofertilization; day 5 blastocyst transfer; day 6 blastocyst transfer; delayed blastulation; live birth rate; pregnancy outcome; THAWED EMBRYO-TRANSFER; LIVE-BIRTH-RATES; PREGNANCY RATE; IMPLANTATION; SINGLE; ENDOMETRIUM; CULTURE; QUALITY; CYCLES; VITRIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2020.00499
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Despite the large number of studies on blastocyst transfers, it is unclear whether day 6 blastocysts have similar pregnancy rates and safety with day 5 blastocysts. Thus, this study aimed to compare the obstetric, neonatal, and clinical outcomes of day 5 and day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfers (VBT). In this retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching, we evaluated 1,313 cycles of VBT performed between January 2014 and December 2015 at the Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center. All cycles underwent natural endometrial preparation. We used propensity score matching to compare day 5 and day 6 VBTs in a matched comparison. After propensity score matching, there were 465 cycles of day 5 VBT and 155 cycles of day 6 VBT. Implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and live birth rate (LBR) were significantly lower in day 6 VBTs (44.2 vs. 53.1%,p= 0.023; 48.4 vs. 60.4%,p= 0.009; 33.5 vs. 51.8%,p< 0.001). Miscarriage rate was significantly higher in day 6 VBTs (29.3 vs. 10.7%,p< 0.001). Rate of multiple gestations was similar between the two groups (29.3 vs. 30.2%,p= 0.816). Assessing 241 and 52 babies from day 5 and day 6 VBTs, no differences were found in neonatal outcomes including rates of low birth weight, preterm birth, and congenital malformations. In propensity score-matched analysis, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes between day 5 and day 6 VBTs were similar so that day 6 VBTs are as safe as day 5 VBTs. IR, CPR, and LBR were are all significantly lower in day 6 VBTs. Therefore, if there are no differences in the morphological grade between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts, transfer of day 5 vitrified blastocysts should be considered first.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
    Bourdon, Mathilde
    Pocate-Cheriet, Khaled
    de Bantel, Astri Finet
    Grzegorczyk-Martin, Veronika
    Hoffet, Aureli Amar
    Arbo, Elisangela
    Poulain, Marine
    Santulli, Pietro
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 (10) : 1948 - 1964
  • [22] Factors influencing live birth outcomes of day 7 blastocysts following autologous single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: A single-centre large cohort study
    Ueno, S.
    Uchiyama, K.
    Okimura, T.
    Yabuuchi, A.
    Kobayashi, T.
    Kato, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 141 - 141
  • [23] Comparing prediction of ongoing pregnancy and live birth outcomes in patients with advanced and younger maternal age patients using KIDScore™ day 5: a large-cohort retrospective study with single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer
    Keiichi Kato
    Satoshi Ueno
    Jørgen Berntsen
    Motoki Ito
    Kiyoe Shimazaki
    Kazuo Uchiyama
    Tadashi Okimura
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 19
  • [24] Comparing prediction of ongoing pregnancy and live birth outcomes in patients with advanced and younger maternal age patients using KIDScore™ day 5: a large-cohort retrospective study with single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer
    Kato, Keiichi
    Ueno, Satoshi
    Berntsen, Jorgen
    Ito, Motoki
    Shimazaki, Kiyoe
    Uchiyama, Kazuo
    Okimura, Tadashi
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [25] Establishment of day 7 blastocyst freezing criteria using blastocyst diameter for single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer from live birth outcomes: a single-center, large cohort, retrospectively matched study
    Satoshi Ueno
    Kazuo Uchiyama
    Tomoko Kuroda
    Tadashi Okimura
    Akiko Yabuuchi
    Tamotsu Kobayashi
    Keiichi Kato
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2020, 37 : 2327 - 2335
  • [26] Establishment of day 7 blastocyst freezing criteria using blastocyst diameter for single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer from live birth outcomes: a single-center, large cohort, retrospectively matched study
    Ueno, Satoshi
    Uchiyama, Kazuo
    Kuroda, Tomoko
    Okimura, Tadashi
    Yabuuchi, Akiko
    Kobayashi, Tamotsu
    Kato, Keiichi
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2020, 37 (09) : 2327 - 2335
  • [27] Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts
    Ueno, Satoshi
    Uchiyama, Kazuo
    Kuroda, Tomoko
    Yabuuchi, Akiko
    Ezoe, Kenji
    Okimura, Tadashi
    Okuno, Takashi
    Kobayashi, Tamotsu
    Kato, Keiichi
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2018, 36 (06) : 614 - 619
  • [28] The Impact of Embryo Quality on Pregnancy Outcomes in Single Day 5 versus Day 6 Euploid Blastocyst Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Thang, Le Duc
    Thuy, Nguyen Minh
    Dung, Tham Chi
    Anh, Phi Thi Tu
    Quy, Phan Ngoc
    Ngoc, Vu Thi
    Linh, Ha Mai
    Le Thuy, Nguyen
    Anh, Cao Tuan
    Thuy, Tran Thu
    Huong, Nguyen Thi Lien
    Hoang, Le
    Hugues, Jean-Noel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2024, 18 (03) : 228 - 233
  • [29] Propensity score-matched study and meta-analysis of cumulative outcomes of day 2/3 versus day 5/6 embryo transfers
    Ye Yin
    Ge Chen
    Kezhen Li
    Qiuyue Liao
    Sijia Zhang
    Nieying Ma
    Jing Chen
    Yan Zhang
    Jihui Ai
    Frontiers of Medicine, 2017, 11 : 563 - 569
  • [30] Propensity score-matched study and meta-analysis of cumulative outcomes of day 2/3 versus day 5/6 embryo transfers
    Yin, Ye
    Chen, Ge
    Li, Kezhen
    Liao, Qiuyue
    Zhang, Sijia
    Ma, Nieying
    Chen, Jing
    Zhang, Yan
    Ai, Jihui
    FRONTIERS OF MEDICINE, 2017, 11 (04) : 563 - 569