Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching

被引:12
|
作者
Park, Dong Soo [1 ]
Kim, Ji Won [1 ]
Chang, Eun Mi [1 ]
Lee, Woo Sik [1 ]
Yoon, Tae Ki [1 ]
Lyu, Sang Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] CHA Univ, Fertil Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med,CHA Gangnam Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
blastocyst; embryo transfer; in vitrofertilization; day 5 blastocyst transfer; day 6 blastocyst transfer; delayed blastulation; live birth rate; pregnancy outcome; THAWED EMBRYO-TRANSFER; LIVE-BIRTH-RATES; PREGNANCY RATE; IMPLANTATION; SINGLE; ENDOMETRIUM; CULTURE; QUALITY; CYCLES; VITRIFICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2020.00499
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Despite the large number of studies on blastocyst transfers, it is unclear whether day 6 blastocysts have similar pregnancy rates and safety with day 5 blastocysts. Thus, this study aimed to compare the obstetric, neonatal, and clinical outcomes of day 5 and day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfers (VBT). In this retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching, we evaluated 1,313 cycles of VBT performed between January 2014 and December 2015 at the Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center. All cycles underwent natural endometrial preparation. We used propensity score matching to compare day 5 and day 6 VBTs in a matched comparison. After propensity score matching, there were 465 cycles of day 5 VBT and 155 cycles of day 6 VBT. Implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and live birth rate (LBR) were significantly lower in day 6 VBTs (44.2 vs. 53.1%,p= 0.023; 48.4 vs. 60.4%,p= 0.009; 33.5 vs. 51.8%,p< 0.001). Miscarriage rate was significantly higher in day 6 VBTs (29.3 vs. 10.7%,p< 0.001). Rate of multiple gestations was similar between the two groups (29.3 vs. 30.2%,p= 0.816). Assessing 241 and 52 babies from day 5 and day 6 VBTs, no differences were found in neonatal outcomes including rates of low birth weight, preterm birth, and congenital malformations. In propensity score-matched analysis, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes between day 5 and day 6 VBTs were similar so that day 6 VBTs are as safe as day 5 VBTs. IR, CPR, and LBR were are all significantly lower in day 6 VBTs. Therefore, if there are no differences in the morphological grade between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts, transfer of day 5 vitrified blastocysts should be considered first.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed day 5 blastocyst transfers compared to vitrified-warmed day 6 blastocyst transfers: A meta analysis
    Zeng, MeiFang
    Qin, Su Su
    Wen, Ping
    Xu, ChengMing
    Duan, JinLiang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 247 : 219 - 224
  • [2] Safety and IVF outcomes of Day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfers : comparison with Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfers with propensity score matching
    Park, D. S.
    Lyu, S. W.
    Park, H. M.
    Jeong, J. H.
    Lee, W. S.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 74 - 74
  • [3] Developmental competence and neonatal outcomes of nonpronuclear zygotes following single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers using propensity score matching analysis
    Jie Zhu
    Cunli Wang
    Zhenyi Cao
    Kang Luan
    Yan Wu
    Huiqun Yin
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2024, 309 (1) : 295 - 304
  • [4] Developmental competence and neonatal outcomes of nonpronuclear zygotes following single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers using propensity score matching analysis
    Zhu, Jie
    Wang, Cunli
    Cao, Zhenyi
    Luan, Kang
    Wu, Yan
    Yin, Huiqun
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 309 (01) : 295 - 304
  • [5] Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer in day 1 rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a retrospective cohort study
    Li, Ming
    Zhang, Nan
    Huang, Jin
    Li, Qin
    Li, JunSheng
    Li, Rong
    Liu, Ping
    Qiao, Jie
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2024, 41 (07) : 1825 - 1833
  • [6] Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts
    Tubbing, Alice
    Shaw-Jackson, Chloe
    Ameye, Lieveke
    Colin, Jerome
    Rozenberg, Serge
    Autin, Candice
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (03) : 417 - 424
  • [7] Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts
    Alice Tubbing
    Chloë Shaw-Jackson
    Lieveke Ameye
    Jérôme Colin
    Serge Rozenberg
    Candice Autin
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 417 - 424
  • [8] Noneffectiveness of cryostorage duration on clinical and neonatal outcomes after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers
    Baatarsuren, Mungunshagai
    Jamiyansuren, Jambaldorj
    Ganbaatar, Chinzorig
    Sengebaljir, Davaakhuu
    Erdenekhuyag, Belguune
    Enkhbaatar, Sandag
    Mungunsuvd, Namsrai
    Baljinnyam, Lkhagvasuren
    Tumur-Ochir, Ganjiguur
    Amarsaikhan, Ariunaa
    Dorjpurev, Amarjargal
    Ganbat, Gereltsetseg
    Boris, Tsogzolmaa
    Khangarid, Azjargal
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [9] Increased pregnancy outcome after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of human vitrified-warmed blastocysts
    Sciorio, Romualdo
    Thong, K. J.
    Pickering, Susan J.
    ZYGOTE, 2019, 27 (05) : 279 - 284
  • [10] Clinical outcome of vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer performed on day 5 and day 6 after LH surge detected by urine tests
    Reljic, M.
    Kovac, V.
    Lovrec, V. Gavric
    Mlakar, L.
    Testen, P. Kores
    Knez, J.
    Rakic, K.
    Kovacic, B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2019, 34 : 215 - 215