Selective Immune Apheresis Technologies - Where Do We Stand?

被引:0
|
作者
Ramlow, Wolfgang [1 ]
Prophet, Heinrich [1 ]
Emmrich, Joerg [2 ]
机构
[1] Apheresis Ctr, Nobelstr 53, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
[2] Univ Rostock, Dept Gastroenterol, Rostock, Germany
关键词
Blood component removal; Immunoadsorption; Autoimmune diseases; Dilated cardiomyopathy; Ulcerative colitis; Transplantation; Pemphigus;
D O I
10.1159/000176640
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Due to inadequate scientific evidence there are almost no established guidelines for the application of immune apheresis therapy in a specific disease condition. Relatively high costs and the requirement for specially trained staff and special technical equipment are the major reasons that apheresis therapy usually is not considered until life threatening conditions or end-stage disease have developed. In this complex situation, standardization of treatment and scientific evaluation is extremely difficult to manage. The preparation and conduct of well-designed randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical effectiveness of immune apheresis therefore requires a close interdisciplinary collaboration of clinicians, researchers and industry. On this background, this review describes the current status and future trends of selective immune apheresis therapy in autoimmune diseases and immune-mediated clinical conditions in which antibodies antagonize special treatment options such as transplantation or coagulation factor substitution. In order to transfer persuasive clinical experience of apheresis experts into scientific evidence and general acceptance of this treatment modality, a more sophisticated patient selection and a harmonization of study protocols on an international perspective, together with prospective data collection by national and international registries, are the main future tasks of the apheresis community. (C) 2008 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg i.Br.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Where do we stand on econophysics?
    Carbone, A.
    Kaniadakis, G.
    Scarfone, A. M.
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2007, 382 (01) : XI - XIV
  • [32] WHERE DO WE STAND WITH PPIS
    WELSH, JS
    AMERICAN PHARMACY, 1979, 19 (12): : 12 - 14
  • [33] Hyperfractionation: Where do we stand?
    BeckBornholdt, HP
    Dubben, HH
    LiertzPetersen, C
    Willers, H
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 43 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [34] Delirium: Where do we stand?
    Pae C.-U.
    Marks D.M.
    Han C.
    Patkar A.A.
    Masand P.
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2008, 10 (3) : 240 - 248
  • [35] Tuberculosis: Where do we stand?
    Becx-Bleumink, M
    Broekmans, JF
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 1998, 3 (06) : 423 - 424
  • [36] WHERE DO WE STAND ON METRIFICATION
    KIRCHER, KF
    DESIGN NEWS, 1969, 24 (02) : 1 - &
  • [37] Reflections on "Where Do We Stand?"
    Mccaslin, Richard B.
    CIVIL WAR HISTORY, 2014, 60 (04) : 407 - 408
  • [38] Biomarkers, Where Do We Stand
    Dixit, Vikash
    Sharma, Payal
    Dhage, Atul Dyandeo
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 57 (05) : S165 - S166
  • [39] TUBERCULOSIS - WHERE DO WE STAND
    HOLGUIN, AH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF HEALTH ASSOCIATION, 1968, 17 (02): : 175 - 178
  • [40] Pegasparaginase: where do we stand?
    Zeidan, Amer
    Wang, Eunice S.
    Wetzler, Meir
    EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2009, 9 (01) : 111 - 119