Selective Immune Apheresis Technologies - Where Do We Stand?

被引:0
|
作者
Ramlow, Wolfgang [1 ]
Prophet, Heinrich [1 ]
Emmrich, Joerg [2 ]
机构
[1] Apheresis Ctr, Nobelstr 53, D-18059 Rostock, Germany
[2] Univ Rostock, Dept Gastroenterol, Rostock, Germany
关键词
Blood component removal; Immunoadsorption; Autoimmune diseases; Dilated cardiomyopathy; Ulcerative colitis; Transplantation; Pemphigus;
D O I
10.1159/000176640
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Due to inadequate scientific evidence there are almost no established guidelines for the application of immune apheresis therapy in a specific disease condition. Relatively high costs and the requirement for specially trained staff and special technical equipment are the major reasons that apheresis therapy usually is not considered until life threatening conditions or end-stage disease have developed. In this complex situation, standardization of treatment and scientific evaluation is extremely difficult to manage. The preparation and conduct of well-designed randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical effectiveness of immune apheresis therefore requires a close interdisciplinary collaboration of clinicians, researchers and industry. On this background, this review describes the current status and future trends of selective immune apheresis therapy in autoimmune diseases and immune-mediated clinical conditions in which antibodies antagonize special treatment options such as transplantation or coagulation factor substitution. In order to transfer persuasive clinical experience of apheresis experts into scientific evidence and general acceptance of this treatment modality, a more sophisticated patient selection and a harmonization of study protocols on an international perspective, together with prospective data collection by national and international registries, are the main future tasks of the apheresis community. (C) 2008 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg i.Br.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ColVI myopathies: where do we stand, where do we go?
    Allamand, Valerie
    Brinas, Laura
    Richard, Pascale
    Stojkovic, Tanya
    Quijano-Roy, Susana
    Bonne, Gisele
    SKELETAL MUSCLE, 2011, 1
  • [22] Rye and health - Where do we stand and where do we go?
    Jonsson, Karin
    Andersson, Roger
    Knudsen, Knud Erik Bach
    Hallmans, Goran
    Hanhineva, Kati
    Katina, Kati
    Kolehmainen, Marjukka
    Kyro, Cecilie
    Langton, Maud
    Nordlund, Emilia
    Laerke, Helle Nygaard
    Olsen, Anja
    Poutanen, Kajsa
    Tjonneland, Anne
    Landberg, Rikard
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 79 : 78 - 87
  • [23] Digital technologies & linguistically and culturally relevant pedagogies: where do we stand?
    Le Pichon, Emmanuelle
    Cavalcante, Alexandre
    Gagne, Antoinette
    Sauvage, Jeremi
    LANGUAGE CULTURE AND CURRICULUM, 2024, 37 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [24] Pathogen inactivation/reduction technologies for platelet transfusion: Where do we stand?
    Garraud, O.
    Lozano, M.
    TRANSFUSION CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2018, 25 (03) : 165 - 171
  • [25] Inflation: Where do we stand?
    Martin, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS A, 2005, 20 (19): : 4676 - 4682
  • [26] Where do we stand with hepatoblastoma?
    Schnater, JM
    Köhler, SE
    Lamers, WH
    von Schweinitz, D
    Aronson, DC
    CANCER, 2003, 98 (04) : 668 - 678
  • [27] Where do we stand in the OECD?
    Buske, L
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1997, 156 (03) : 464 - 464
  • [28] GFIS - Where do we stand?
    Anon
    IUFRO News, 2002, 31 (02):
  • [29] The GSEs: Where do we stand?
    Poole, William
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST LOUIS REVIEW, 2007, 89 (03): : 143 - 151
  • [30] VITILIGO - WHERE DO WE STAND
    ORTONNE, JP
    BOSE, SK
    PIGMENT CELL RESEARCH, 1993, 6 (02): : 61 - 72