Power customer satisfaction and profitability analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods

被引:23
|
作者
Medjoudj, Rabah [1 ]
Aissani, Djamil [2 ]
Haim, Klaus Dieter [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bejaia, Lamos Lab, Dept Elect Engn, Bejaia, Algeria
[2] Univ Bejaia, Lamos Lab, Dept Operat Res, Bejaia, Algeria
[3] Univ Sci & Technol, Zittau, Germany
关键词
Electrical distribution system; Decision making methods; Economic criteria; Customer satisfaction; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.08.062
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Nowadays, the consumer demands for electrical energy are increasingly growing, because this energy is present in all fields of human activity. Any company producing and distributing electric power sets two main objectives, namely: customer satisfaction and profit making. The aim of this paper is to investigate appropriate tools (multi-criteria decision making methods) aiding decision makers to achieve these goals. The criteria adopted revolve around quality of service and include: cost, reliability, availability, maintainability and power quality. However, the alternatives are technical and organizational measures often taken in planning and operation phases of electrical power systems. Three methods are used, namely: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the cost benefit analysis (CBA) and the economic criteria inspired from game theory (ECIGT). The first method highlights the impact of the experts' views in the formalism of the final decision of the manager and it is viewed as a transparent decision process. As for the ECIGT, it provides several scenarios to define a strategy according to the decision maker's behavior. One of its important finding resides in the possibility of evaluating the reactions of the customers towards the decisions taken by the system manager. Consequently, it allows the analysis of the enterprise profitability. However, the CBA method is efficiently integrated into these two complex methods decision making. The application developed in this paper shows that RAM (reliability, availability and maintainability) criteria are significant stakes in the performance of a business and are an important asset for new projects justification. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 339
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods: A systematic literature review
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    Chen, Xu-Qi
    Duan, Chun-Yan
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 135 : 881 - 897
  • [32] Determination of Critical Component Failure in Thermal Power Station by Using Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Rakesh Kumar Patel
    Ravi. K. Dwivedi
    [J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2020, 20 : 353 - 357
  • [33] Comparative analysis of various oxygen production techniques using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Aljaghoub, Haya
    Alasad, Shamma
    Alashkar, Adnan
    AlMallahi, Maryam
    Hasan, Ranem
    Obaideen, Khaled
    Alami, Abdul Hai
    [J]. International Journal of Thermofluids, 2023, 17
  • [34] Is it possible to use multi-criteria criteria decision making methods for rural typology?
    Klufova, Renata
    Rost, Michael
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS (MME 2014), 2014, : 419 - 424
  • [35] Determination of Critical Component Failure in Thermal Power Station by Using Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Patel, Rakesh Kumar
    Dwivedi, Ravi. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAILURE ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 20 (02) : 353 - 357
  • [36] Leveraging multi-criteria customer feedback for satisfaction analysis and improved recommendations
    Jannach, Dietmar
    Zanker, Markus
    Fuchs, Matthias
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & TOURISM, 2014, 14 (02) : 119 - 149
  • [37] Multi-criteria decision making in ontologies
    Bastinos, Ana Sasa
    Krisper, Marjan
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 222 : 593 - 610
  • [38] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [39] Fundamentals of multi-criteria decision making
    不详
    [J]. EFFICIENCY VERSUS SUSTAINABILITY IN DYNAMIC DECISION MAKING, 2002, 520 : 21 - 73
  • [40] Pareto multi-criteria decision making
    Grierson, Donald E.
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2008, 22 (03) : 371 - 384