Power customer satisfaction and profitability analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods

被引:23
|
作者
Medjoudj, Rabah [1 ]
Aissani, Djamil [2 ]
Haim, Klaus Dieter [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bejaia, Lamos Lab, Dept Elect Engn, Bejaia, Algeria
[2] Univ Bejaia, Lamos Lab, Dept Operat Res, Bejaia, Algeria
[3] Univ Sci & Technol, Zittau, Germany
关键词
Electrical distribution system; Decision making methods; Economic criteria; Customer satisfaction; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.08.062
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Nowadays, the consumer demands for electrical energy are increasingly growing, because this energy is present in all fields of human activity. Any company producing and distributing electric power sets two main objectives, namely: customer satisfaction and profit making. The aim of this paper is to investigate appropriate tools (multi-criteria decision making methods) aiding decision makers to achieve these goals. The criteria adopted revolve around quality of service and include: cost, reliability, availability, maintainability and power quality. However, the alternatives are technical and organizational measures often taken in planning and operation phases of electrical power systems. Three methods are used, namely: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the cost benefit analysis (CBA) and the economic criteria inspired from game theory (ECIGT). The first method highlights the impact of the experts' views in the formalism of the final decision of the manager and it is viewed as a transparent decision process. As for the ECIGT, it provides several scenarios to define a strategy according to the decision maker's behavior. One of its important finding resides in the possibility of evaluating the reactions of the customers towards the decisions taken by the system manager. Consequently, it allows the analysis of the enterprise profitability. However, the CBA method is efficiently integrated into these two complex methods decision making. The application developed in this paper shows that RAM (reliability, availability and maintainability) criteria are significant stakes in the performance of a business and are an important asset for new projects justification. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 339
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Potential Influencers Identification Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods
    Gandhi, Meera
    Muruganantham, A.
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT TRENDS IN COMPUTING 2015 (ICRTC-2015), 2015, 57 : 1179 - 1188
  • [22] Comparative analysis of three categories of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Li, Yingfang
    He, Xingxing
    Martinez, Luis
    Zhang, Jiafeng
    Wang, Danchen
    Liu, Xueqin Amy
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [23] A BIBLIOMETRIC DATA ANALYSIS OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS IN HERITAGE BUILDINGS
    Morkunaite, Zydrune
    Kalibatas, Darius
    Kalibatiene, Diana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 25 (02) : 76 - 99
  • [24] Decision Making Using A Multi-Criteria Approach In A Wholesale Electrical Power Market
    Khan, Taufiquar
    Reneke, James
    Grotheer, Rachel
    Strauss, Thilo
    [J]. 2015 CLEMSON UNIVERSITY POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (PSC), 2015,
  • [25] Cognitive support methods for multi-criteria expert decision making
    Bisdorff, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 119 (02) : 379 - 387
  • [26] A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Castillo-Lopez, Elena
    Rodriguez-Hernandez, Jorge
    Canteras-Jordana, Juan Carlos
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 45 : 151 - 162
  • [27] Multi-criteria decision making methods: Application in the aviation industry
    Dozic, Slavica
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 79
  • [28] Big data analysis for multi-criteria decision making
    Kumar, Akshi
    Bhatia, M.P.S.
    [J]. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2021, 14 (05) : 1400 - 1401
  • [29] Multi-criteria decision making with overlapping criteria
    Abdulla, Mohammed Shahid
    [J]. IIMB MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 24 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [30] Analysis and prioritisation of risks in a reverse logistics network using hybrid multi-criteria decision making methods
    Senthil, S.
    Murugananthan, K.
    Ramesh, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 179 : 716 - 730