Pharmacogenetic algorithm for individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles

被引:11
|
作者
Roque, Matheus [1 ,2 ]
Bianco, Bianca [3 ]
Christofolini, Denise M. [3 ]
Cordts, Emerson Barchi [3 ]
Vilarino, Fabia [3 ]
Carvalho, Waldemar [3 ]
Valle, Marcello [1 ]
Sampaio, Marcos [1 ]
Geber, Selmo [1 ]
Esteves, Sandro C. [4 ]
Barbosa, Caio Parente [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Reprod Med ORIGEN, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Human Reprod & Genet Ctr, Fac Med ABC, Dept Collect Hlth, Santo Andre, Brazil
[4] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Div Urol, Dept Surg, Androl & Human Reprod Clin ANDROFERT, Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Pharmacogenetics; Algorithms; Ovulation induction; Polymorphism; genetic; Fertilization in vitro; Reproductive techniques; RECEPTOR GENE-EXPRESSION; CUMULUS CELLS; FSH; HYPERSTIMULATION; POLYMORPHISMS; GROWTH; PREGNANCY; ANDROGEN; PROTOCOL; LHCGR;
D O I
10.23736/S0031-0808.18.03496-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is crucial for optimizing in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) success. Multiple factors influence the ovarian response to COS, making predictions about oocyte yields not so straightforward. As a result, the ovarian response may be poor or suboptimal, or even excessive, all of which have negative consequences for the affected patient. There is a group of patients that present with a suboptimal response to COS despite normal biomarkers of ovarian reserve, such as AFC and AMH. These patients have a lower number of retrieved oocytes than what was expected based on their ovarian reserve, thus showing the inadequacy of using only the traditional ovarian reserve biomarkers to predict the ovarian response. Suboptimal response to COS might be related to ovarian sensitivity to exogenous gonadotropins modulated by genetic factors. The understanding of the gene polymorphisms related to reproductive function can help to improve the clinical management of this patient population and to explain some of the individual patient variability in response to COS. The development of a pharmacogenetic approach concerning COS in the context of assisted reproduction seems attractive as it might help to understand the relationship between genetic variants and ovarian response to exogenous gonadotropins. The patient's genetic profile could be used to select the most appropriate gonadotropin type, predict the optimal dosage for each drug, develop a cost-effective treatment plan, maximize the success rates, and lastly, decrease the time-to-pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 81
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles
    van Wely, Madelon
    Kwan, Irene
    Burt, Anna L.
    Thomas, Jane
    Vail, Andy
    Van der Veen, Fulco
    Al-Inany, Hesham G.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (02):
  • [2] Prothrombotic biomarkers during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology
    Hugon-Rodin, Justine
    Casini, Alessandro
    Benard, Julie
    Poncet, Antoine
    Raverot, Veronique
    Fontana, Pierre
    Vulliemoz, Nicolas
    Streuli, Isabelle
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 119 (06) : 976 - 984
  • [3] Current Therapeutic Options for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Annalisa Racca
    Panagiotis Drakopoulos
    Ana Raquel Neves
    Nikolaos P. Polyzos
    Drugs, 2020, 80 : 973 - 994
  • [4] Current Therapeutic Options for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Racca, Annalisa
    Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
    Raquel Neves, Ana
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    DRUGS, 2020, 80 (10) : 973 - 994
  • [5] Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles for Varied Patient Profiles: An Indian Perspective
    Jirge, Padma Rekha
    Patil, Madhuri Milind
    Gutgutia, Rohit
    Shah, Jatin
    Govindarajan, Mridubhashini
    Roy, Varsha Samson
    Kaul-Mahajan, Nalini
    Sharara, Faddy I.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (02) : 112 - 125
  • [6] Endometrial morphology and modulation of hormone receptors during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Detti, Laura
    Saed, Ghassan M.
    Fletcher, Nicole M.
    Kruger, Michael L.
    Brossoit, Michelle
    Diamond, Michael P.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (03) : 1037 - 1041
  • [7] ADJUSTED INDIRECT COMPARISON OF THE MEDICINES USING IN CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY
    Yagudina, R.
    Kulikov, A.
    Serpik, V
    Krylov, V
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S163 - S164
  • [8] Ovarian stimulation protocols in assisted reproductive technology: an update
    Howles, Colin M.
    Ezcurra, Diego
    Homburg, Roy
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2012, 7 (03) : 319 - 330
  • [9] A quality management approach to controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: the "Fischer protocol"
    Fischer, Robert
    Nakano, Fabiana Y.
    Roque, Matheus
    Bento, Fabiola C.
    Baukloh, Vera
    Esteves, Sandro C.
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2019, 61 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [10] Effect of repeated assisted reproductive technology cycles on ovarian response
    Kolibianakis, E
    Osmanagaoglu, K
    Camus, M
    Tournaye, H
    Van Steirteghem, A
    Devroey, P
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (05) : 967 - 970