Pharmacogenetic algorithm for individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles

被引:11
|
作者
Roque, Matheus [1 ,2 ]
Bianco, Bianca [3 ]
Christofolini, Denise M. [3 ]
Cordts, Emerson Barchi [3 ]
Vilarino, Fabia [3 ]
Carvalho, Waldemar [3 ]
Valle, Marcello [1 ]
Sampaio, Marcos [1 ]
Geber, Selmo [1 ]
Esteves, Sandro C. [4 ]
Barbosa, Caio Parente [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Reprod Med ORIGEN, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Human Reprod & Genet Ctr, Fac Med ABC, Dept Collect Hlth, Santo Andre, Brazil
[4] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Div Urol, Dept Surg, Androl & Human Reprod Clin ANDROFERT, Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Pharmacogenetics; Algorithms; Ovulation induction; Polymorphism; genetic; Fertilization in vitro; Reproductive techniques; RECEPTOR GENE-EXPRESSION; CUMULUS CELLS; FSH; HYPERSTIMULATION; POLYMORPHISMS; GROWTH; PREGNANCY; ANDROGEN; PROTOCOL; LHCGR;
D O I
10.23736/S0031-0808.18.03496-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is crucial for optimizing in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) success. Multiple factors influence the ovarian response to COS, making predictions about oocyte yields not so straightforward. As a result, the ovarian response may be poor or suboptimal, or even excessive, all of which have negative consequences for the affected patient. There is a group of patients that present with a suboptimal response to COS despite normal biomarkers of ovarian reserve, such as AFC and AMH. These patients have a lower number of retrieved oocytes than what was expected based on their ovarian reserve, thus showing the inadequacy of using only the traditional ovarian reserve biomarkers to predict the ovarian response. Suboptimal response to COS might be related to ovarian sensitivity to exogenous gonadotropins modulated by genetic factors. The understanding of the gene polymorphisms related to reproductive function can help to improve the clinical management of this patient population and to explain some of the individual patient variability in response to COS. The development of a pharmacogenetic approach concerning COS in the context of assisted reproduction seems attractive as it might help to understand the relationship between genetic variants and ovarian response to exogenous gonadotropins. The patient's genetic profile could be used to select the most appropriate gonadotropin type, predict the optimal dosage for each drug, develop a cost-effective treatment plan, maximize the success rates, and lastly, decrease the time-to-pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 81
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles. A Cochrane review (vol 18, pg 11, 2012)
    van Wely, Madelon
    Kwan, Irene
    Burt, Anna L.
    Thomas, Jane
    Vail, Andy
    Van der Veen, Fulco
    Al-Inany, Hesham G.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2012, 18 (03) : 340 - 340
  • [42] Induction of monoovulatory cycles for assisted reproductive technology (ART)
    Crosignani, PG
    Somigliana, E
    Colombo, M
    Riccaboni, A
    Ragni, G
    Proceedings of the 13th World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization, Assisted Reproduction & Genetics, 2005, : 259 - 262
  • [43] Melatonin supplementation during controlled ovarian stimulation for women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Seko, Ludimila M. D.
    Moroni, Rafael M.
    Leitao, Valeria M. S.
    Teixeira, Danielle M.
    Nastri, Carolina O.
    Martins, Wellington P.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 101 (01) : 154 - +
  • [44] Reply: HCG supplementation of controlled ovarian stimulation cycles
    Thuesen, L. L.
    Loft, A.
    Smitz, J.
    Andersen, A. Nyboe
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (01) : 284 - 284
  • [45] Randomized comparison of different ovarian stimulation regimens for assisted reproductive technology in baboons (Papio anubis)
    Nyachieo, Atunga
    Spiessens, Carl
    Chai, Daniel C.
    Debrock, Sophie
    Mwenda, Jason M.
    d'Hooghe, Thomas M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (04) : 1354 - 1359
  • [46] Past, Present, and Future of Gonadotropin Use in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation During Assisted Reproductive Techniques
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Anagnostou, Elli
    Mavrogianni, Depy
    Liokari, Emmanouela
    Dimitroulia, Evangelia
    Drakakis, Petros
    Loutradis, Dimitrios
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [47] Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in assisted reproductive technologies: rFSH alone or rFSH and HMG combined?
    Mahmoud, K.
    Zhioua, F.
    Kefi-Attaoui, L.
    Ben Aribia, M. H.
    Meherzi, F.
    Nemsia, J.
    Ghalleb, M.
    Elouakdi, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 : 92 - 92
  • [48] Oocyte stimulation parameters influence the number and proportion of mature oocytes retrieved in assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Damla C. Gonullu
    David H. McCulloh
    LeRoy G. Robinson
    Cheongeun Oh
    David L. Keefe
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2021, 38 : 2283 - 2289
  • [49] Oocyte stimulation parameters influence the number and proportion of mature oocytes retrieved in assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Gonullu, Damla C.
    McCulloh, David H.
    Robinson, LeRoy G., Jr.
    Oh, Cheongeun
    Keefe, David L.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2021, 38 (09) : 2283 - 2289
  • [50] Basal antral follicle number and mean ovarian diameter predict cycle cancellation and ovarian responsiveness in assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Frattarelli, JL
    Lauria-Costa, DF
    Miller, BT
    Bergh, PA
    Scott, RT
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (03) : 512 - 517