Prothrombotic biomarkers during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology

被引:1
|
作者
Hugon-Rodin, Justine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Casini, Alessandro [4 ]
Benard, Julie [5 ]
Poncet, Antoine [1 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Raverot, Veronique [9 ,10 ]
Fontana, Pierre [4 ]
Vulliemoz, Nicolas [11 ]
Streuli, Isabelle [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Dept Femme Enfantet Adolescent DFEA Ob Gyn Reprod, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Hosp St Joseph, INSERM, U1153, Gynaecol Endocrinol Unit,EPOPE Grp,Gynecol Dept, Paris, France
[4] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Angiol & Haemostasis, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Geneva Univ Hosp, Dept Woman Child & Adolescent Med, Div Gynecol, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Geneva, Dept Hlth & Community Med, CRC & Div Clin Epidemiol, Geneva, Switzerland
[7] Univ Geneva, Div Clin Epidemiol, Dept Hlth & Community Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[8] Univ Hosp Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[9] Hosp Civils Lyon, Serv Biochim & Biol Mol, Hormonol, Bron, France
[10] Univ Lyon, INSERM, UMRS 102, Neurosci Res Ctr,Waking Team, Bron, France
[11] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Dept Woman Mother Child, Fertil Med & Gynaecol Endocrinol, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
thrombin generation; hypercoagulability biomarkers; agonist trigger; controlled ovarian stimulation; and in vitro fertilization; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; THROMBIN GENERATION; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; THROMBOEMBOLISM; ESTRADIOL; ESTROGEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the impact of 3 different ovarian stimulation protocols on surrogate biomarkers of coagulation. Design: Observational multicenter cohort study. Setting: The study was conducted in assisted reproductive technology (ART) units. Patients: Infertile women undergoing ART in 2017-2019 were included. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Our primary outcome was the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) assessed by the calibrated automated thrombogram. The ETP was measured at baseline (T1), on the day of ovulation triggering (T2), and 7 days after triggering (T3). Three protocols were prescribed according to the standards used and without hormonal before treatment: agonist protocol with human cho-rionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger (ag-hCG), antagonist protocol with hCG trigger (atg-hCG), or GnRH agonist trigger. The evolution of ETP was compared among groups using a mixed-effects linear regression model. Result(s): Sixty-four women with a mean age of 37.8 years participated in the study: of which 24, 16, 24 received ag-hCG, atg-hCG, and GnRH agonist triggers, respectively. As expected, the mean serum estradiol levels in GnRH agonist trigger were statistically higher at T2 and lower at T3 than that for both ag-hCG and atg-hCG. Overall, the ETP evolution over time was statistically different between the groups. Values were similar between groups at T1 and increased at T2 in each group. The greatest difference occurred between T2 and T3 in each group. The ETP continued to increase at T3 in ag-hCG (+110 nM/L x min) and atg-hCG (+171 nM/L x min), but it remained stable in GnRH agonist trigger (-2 nM/L x min). Sex hormone-binding globulin showed persistent increase at T3 despite the fall in estradiol levels, particularly in the GnRH agonist trigger group. Conclusion(s): The ag-hCG and atg-hCG groups were associated with a higher hypercoagulable state at T3 than the GnRH agonist trigger group. However, our results show the persistence of a hypercoagulable state after the GnRH agonist triggering despite a sharp drop in estradiol levels. These findings may support the use of GnRH agonist trigger protocol in patients with high thrombotic risk and gives new insight into the fact that coagulation parameters could be disturbed for long time periods. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04188444 (Fertil Steril (R) 2023;119:976-84. (c) 2023 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:976 / 984
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prothrombotic biomarkers during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive techniques
    Streuli, I.
    Casini, A.
    Benard, J.
    Poncet, A.
    Fontana, P.
    Vulliemoz, N.
    Hugon-Rodin, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 420 - 420
  • [2] Prothrombotic biomarkers during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive techniques
    Streuli, I.
    Casini, A.
    Benard, J.
    Poncet, A.
    Fontana, P.
    Vulliemoz, N.
    Hugon-Rodin, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 23 - 24
  • [3] Current Therapeutic Options for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Annalisa Racca
    Panagiotis Drakopoulos
    Ana Raquel Neves
    Nikolaos P. Polyzos
    Drugs, 2020, 80 : 973 - 994
  • [4] Current Therapeutic Options for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology
    Racca, Annalisa
    Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
    Raquel Neves, Ana
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    DRUGS, 2020, 80 (10) : 973 - 994
  • [5] Pharmacogenetic algorithm for individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Roque, Matheus
    Bianco, Bianca
    Christofolini, Denise M.
    Cordts, Emerson Barchi
    Vilarino, Fabia
    Carvalho, Waldemar
    Valle, Marcello
    Sampaio, Marcos
    Geber, Selmo
    Esteves, Sandro C.
    Barbosa, Caio Parente
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2019, 61 (01) : 76 - 81
  • [6] ADJUSTED INDIRECT COMPARISON OF THE MEDICINES USING IN CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY
    Yagudina, R.
    Kulikov, A.
    Serpik, V
    Krylov, V
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S163 - S164
  • [7] Ovarian stimulation protocols in assisted reproductive technology: an update
    Howles, Colin M.
    Ezcurra, Diego
    Homburg, Roy
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2012, 7 (03) : 319 - 330
  • [8] A quality management approach to controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: the "Fischer protocol"
    Fischer, Robert
    Nakano, Fabiana Y.
    Roque, Matheus
    Bento, Fabiola C.
    Baukloh, Vera
    Esteves, Sandro C.
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2019, 61 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [9] CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION - AN ADJUNCT TO ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY
    MASCARENHAS, L
    KHASTGIR, G
    DAVIES, WAR
    LEE, S
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1994, 61 (06) : 1158 - 1160
  • [10] Does a hyperechogenic endometrial mass in the uterus during controlled ovarian stimulation affect assisted reproductive technology cycle outcomes?
    Deng, Ke
    Zhang, Mei
    Kong, Wei-Ya
    Liu, Wei
    Zhang, Ya-nan
    Yu, Qian
    Wu, Gui-hua
    Yan, Lei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 250 : 17 - 23