Hydrogeochemical patterns, processes and mass transfers during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in an anoxic sandy aquifer

被引:32
|
作者
Antoniou, E. A. [1 ,2 ]
van Breukelen, B. M. [2 ]
Putters, B. [3 ]
Stuyfzand, P. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KWR Watercycle Res Inst, NL-3430 BB Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Earth Sci, Crit Zone Hydrol Grp, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Water Supply Co Limburg WML, NL-6229 GA Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
PYRITE OXIDATION; WATER; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.09.006
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The hydrogeochemical processes that took place during an aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) trial in a confined anoxic sandy aquifer (Herten, the Netherlands) were identified and quantified, using observation wells at 0.1, 8 and 25 m distance from the ASR well. Oxic drinking water was injected in 14 ASR cycles in the period 2000-2009. The main reactions consisted of the oxidation of pyrite, sedimentary organic matter, and (adsorbed) Fe(II) and Mn(II) in all aquifer layers (A-D), whereas the dissolution of carbonates (Mg-calcite and Mn-siderite) occurred mainly in aquifer layer D. Extinction of the mobilization of SO4, Fe(II), Mn(II), As, Co, Ni, Ca and total inorganic C pointed at pyrite and calcite leaching in layer A, whereas reactions with Mn-siderite in layer D did not show a significant extinction over time. Iron(II) and Mn(II) removal during recovery was demonstrated by particle tracking and pointed at sorption to neoformed ferrihydrite. Part of the oxidants was removed by neoformed organic material in the ASR proximal zone (0 -ca. 5 m) where micro-organisms grow during injection and die away when storage exceeds about 1 month. Anoxic conditions during storage led to increased concentrations for a.o. Fe(II), Mn(II) and NH4 as noted for the first 50-200 m(3) of abstracted water during the recovery phase. With a mass balance approach the water-sediment reactions and leaching rate of the reactive solid phases were quantified. Leaching of pyrite and calcite reached completion at up to 8 m distance in layer A, but not in layer D. The mass balance approach moreover showed that Mn-siderite in layer D was probably responsible for the Mn(II) exceedances of the drinking water standard (0.9 mu mol/L) in the recovered water. Leaching of the Mn-siderite up to 8 m from the ASR well would take 1600 more pore volumes of drinking water injection (on top of the realized 460). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2435 / 2452
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impacts of dual-porosity aquifers on Aquifer Storage Recovery (ASR) schemes
    Williams, AT
    Gaus, I
    Gale, IN
    GROUNDWATER: PAST ACHIEVEMENTS AND FUTURE CHALLENGES, 2000, : 1065 - 1069
  • [32] The role of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) technique in sustainability: A case study for Kuwait
    AlRukaibi, Duaij
    Technical (Online) Report - University of Texas at Austin, Center for Research in Water Resources, 2010, 10 (10): : 1 - 337
  • [33] Improving arsenopyrite oxidation rate laws: implications for arsenic mobilization during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR)
    Chelsea W. Neil
    M. Jason Todd
    Y. Jeffrey Yang
    Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2018, 40 : 2453 - 2464
  • [34] Improving arsenopyrite oxidation rate laws: implications for arsenic mobilization during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR)
    Neil, Chelsea W.
    Todd, M. Jason
    Yang, Y. Jeffrey
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH, 2018, 40 (06) : 2453 - 2464
  • [35] Identification of potential sites for aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in coastal areas using ASR performance estimation methods
    Zuurbier, Koen G.
    Bakker, Mark
    Zaadnoordijk, Willem Jan
    Stuyfzand, Pieter J.
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 21 (06) : 1373 - 1383
  • [36] Water quality changes during aquifer storage recovery in limestone-silicate aquifer material
    Mirecki, J
    Petkewich, MD
    Conlon, KJ
    Campbell, BG
    WATER-ROCK INTERACTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 189 - 192
  • [37] Assessment of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) feasibility at selected sites in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, UAE
    Sathish, S.
    Mohamed, Mohamed M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2018, 77 (03)
  • [38] Assessment of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) feasibility at selected sites in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, UAE
    S. Sathish
    Mohamed M. Mohamed
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, 77
  • [39] Arsenic release from Floridan Aquifer rock during incubations simulating aquifer storage and recovery operations
    Jin, Jin
    Zimmerman, Andrew R.
    Norton, Stuart B.
    Annable, Michael D.
    Harris, Willie G.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 551 : 238 - 245
  • [40] Implications of rate-limited mass transfer for aquifer storage and recovery
    Culkin, Sean L.
    Singha, Kamini
    Day-Lewis, Frederick D.
    GROUND WATER, 2008, 46 (04) : 591 - 605