Hydrogeochemical patterns, processes and mass transfers during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in an anoxic sandy aquifer

被引:32
|
作者
Antoniou, E. A. [1 ,2 ]
van Breukelen, B. M. [2 ]
Putters, B. [3 ]
Stuyfzand, P. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KWR Watercycle Res Inst, NL-3430 BB Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Earth Sci, Crit Zone Hydrol Grp, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Water Supply Co Limburg WML, NL-6229 GA Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
PYRITE OXIDATION; WATER; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.09.006
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The hydrogeochemical processes that took place during an aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) trial in a confined anoxic sandy aquifer (Herten, the Netherlands) were identified and quantified, using observation wells at 0.1, 8 and 25 m distance from the ASR well. Oxic drinking water was injected in 14 ASR cycles in the period 2000-2009. The main reactions consisted of the oxidation of pyrite, sedimentary organic matter, and (adsorbed) Fe(II) and Mn(II) in all aquifer layers (A-D), whereas the dissolution of carbonates (Mg-calcite and Mn-siderite) occurred mainly in aquifer layer D. Extinction of the mobilization of SO4, Fe(II), Mn(II), As, Co, Ni, Ca and total inorganic C pointed at pyrite and calcite leaching in layer A, whereas reactions with Mn-siderite in layer D did not show a significant extinction over time. Iron(II) and Mn(II) removal during recovery was demonstrated by particle tracking and pointed at sorption to neoformed ferrihydrite. Part of the oxidants was removed by neoformed organic material in the ASR proximal zone (0 -ca. 5 m) where micro-organisms grow during injection and die away when storage exceeds about 1 month. Anoxic conditions during storage led to increased concentrations for a.o. Fe(II), Mn(II) and NH4 as noted for the first 50-200 m(3) of abstracted water during the recovery phase. With a mass balance approach the water-sediment reactions and leaching rate of the reactive solid phases were quantified. Leaching of pyrite and calcite reached completion at up to 8 m distance in layer A, but not in layer D. The mass balance approach moreover showed that Mn-siderite in layer D was probably responsible for the Mn(II) exceedances of the drinking water standard (0.9 mu mol/L) in the recovered water. Leaching of the Mn-siderite up to 8 m from the ASR well would take 1600 more pore volumes of drinking water injection (on top of the realized 460). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2435 / 2452
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) using water treated to irrigation standards
    Martin, RR
    Gerges, NZ
    Dillon, PJ
    GROUNDWATER: PAST ACHIEVEMENTS AND FUTURE CHALLENGES, 2000, : 969 - 973
  • [22] Interrelationships between biological, chemical, and physical processes as an analog to clogging in aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells
    Rinck-Pfeiffer, S
    Ragusa, S
    Sztajnbok, P
    Vandevelde, T
    WATER RESEARCH, 2000, 34 (07) : 2110 - 2118
  • [23] Nutrient Transformation and Removal from Treated Wastewater Recycled Via Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) in a Carbonate Aquifer
    Vanderzalm, Joanne
    Page, Declan
    Regel, Rudi
    Ingleton, Greg
    Nwayo, Chibuikem
    Gonzalez, Dennis
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2020, 231 (02):
  • [24] Nutrient Transformation and Removal from Treated Wastewater Recycled Via Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) in a Carbonate Aquifer
    Joanne Vanderzalm
    Declan Page
    Rudi Regel
    Greg Ingleton
    Chibuikem Nwayo
    Dennis Gonzalez
    Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2020, 231
  • [25] Arsenic Control During Aquifer Storage Recovery Cycle Tests in the Floridan Aquifer
    Mirecki, June E.
    Bennett, Michael W.
    Lopez-Balaez, Marie C.
    GROUND WATER, 2013, 51 (04) : 539 - 549
  • [26] Solute changes during aquifer storage recovery testing in a limestone clastic aquifer
    Mirecki, JE
    Campbell, BG
    Conlon, KJ
    Petkewich, MD
    GROUND WATER, 1998, 36 (03) : 394 - 403
  • [27] Solute changes during aquifer storage recovery testing in a limestone/clastic aquifer
    Department of Geology, University of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424, United States
    不详
    Ground Water, 3 (394-403):
  • [28] Using an aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) trial as a large scale tracer test
    Williams, A
    TRACERS AND MODELLING IN HYDROGEOLOGY, 2000, (262): : 195 - 199
  • [29] Bacteriological assessment of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) water in southwest coastal Bangladesh
    Kabir, Md. Pervez
    Islam, Md. Atikul
    Akber, Md. Ali
    Ahsan, Md. Sabbir
    JOURNAL OF WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 6 (02) : 231 - 241
  • [30] Understanding arsenic behavior in carbonate aquifers: Implications for aquifer storage and recovery (ASR)
    Lazareva, Olesya
    Druschel, Gregory
    Pichler, Thomas
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 52 : 57 - 66