Hydrogeochemical patterns, processes and mass transfers during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in an anoxic sandy aquifer

被引:32
|
作者
Antoniou, E. A. [1 ,2 ]
van Breukelen, B. M. [2 ]
Putters, B. [3 ]
Stuyfzand, P. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KWR Watercycle Res Inst, NL-3430 BB Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Earth Sci, Crit Zone Hydrol Grp, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Water Supply Co Limburg WML, NL-6229 GA Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
PYRITE OXIDATION; WATER; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.09.006
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The hydrogeochemical processes that took place during an aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) trial in a confined anoxic sandy aquifer (Herten, the Netherlands) were identified and quantified, using observation wells at 0.1, 8 and 25 m distance from the ASR well. Oxic drinking water was injected in 14 ASR cycles in the period 2000-2009. The main reactions consisted of the oxidation of pyrite, sedimentary organic matter, and (adsorbed) Fe(II) and Mn(II) in all aquifer layers (A-D), whereas the dissolution of carbonates (Mg-calcite and Mn-siderite) occurred mainly in aquifer layer D. Extinction of the mobilization of SO4, Fe(II), Mn(II), As, Co, Ni, Ca and total inorganic C pointed at pyrite and calcite leaching in layer A, whereas reactions with Mn-siderite in layer D did not show a significant extinction over time. Iron(II) and Mn(II) removal during recovery was demonstrated by particle tracking and pointed at sorption to neoformed ferrihydrite. Part of the oxidants was removed by neoformed organic material in the ASR proximal zone (0 -ca. 5 m) where micro-organisms grow during injection and die away when storage exceeds about 1 month. Anoxic conditions during storage led to increased concentrations for a.o. Fe(II), Mn(II) and NH4 as noted for the first 50-200 m(3) of abstracted water during the recovery phase. With a mass balance approach the water-sediment reactions and leaching rate of the reactive solid phases were quantified. Leaching of pyrite and calcite reached completion at up to 8 m distance in layer A, but not in layer D. The mass balance approach moreover showed that Mn-siderite in layer D was probably responsible for the Mn(II) exceedances of the drinking water standard (0.9 mu mol/L) in the recovered water. Leaching of the Mn-siderite up to 8 m from the ASR well would take 1600 more pore volumes of drinking water injection (on top of the realized 460). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2435 / 2452
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The arsenic problem during Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)
    Pichler, T
    Arthur, JD
    Price, RE
    Jones, GW
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2004, 68 (11) : A520 - A520
  • [2] Nutrient Removal during Stormwater Aquifer Storage and Recovery in an Anoxic Carbonate Aquifer
    Vanderzalm, Joanne L.
    Page, Declan W.
    Dillon, Peter J.
    Barry, Karen E.
    Gonzalez, Dennis
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2018, 47 (02) : 276 - 286
  • [3] Recovery efficiency of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) with mass transfer limitation
    Lu, Chunhui
    Du, Pengfei
    Chen, Yiming
    Luo, Jian
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
  • [4] Fate of organic matter during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) of reclaimed water in a carbonate aquifer
    Vanderzalm, J. L.
    La Salle, C. Le Gal
    Dillon, P. J.
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 21 (07) : 1204 - 1215
  • [5] Aquifer Storage Recovery (ASR) of chlorinated municipal drinking water in a confined aquifer
    Izbicki, John A.
    Petersen, Christen E.
    Glotzbach, Kenneth J.
    Metzger, Loren F.
    Christensen, Allen H.
    Smith, Gregory A.
    O'Leary, David
    Fram, Miranda S.
    Joseph, Trevor
    Shannon, Heather
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 25 (08) : 1133 - 1152
  • [6] Hydrogeochemical Evaluation of Aquifer Storage and Recovery in Edwards Aquifer, New Braunfels, Texas
    Simbo, Christophe Wakamya
    GROUNDWATER, 2024, 62 (04) : 560 - 577
  • [7] Geochemical modelling of fluoride concentration changes during Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) in the Chalk aquifer in Wessex, England
    Gaus, I
    Shand, P
    Gale, IN
    Williams, AT
    Eastwood, JC
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY, 2002, 35 : 203 - 208
  • [8] Hydraulic evaluation of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) with urban stormwater in a brackish limestone aquifer
    Pavelic, Paul
    Dillon, Peter J.
    Barry, Karen E.
    Gerges, Nabil Z.
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2006, 14 (08) : 1544 - 1555
  • [9] Hydraulic evaluation of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) with urban stormwater in a brackish limestone aquifer
    Paul Pavelic
    Peter J. Dillon
    Karen E. Barry
    Nabil Z. Gerges
    Hydrogeology Journal, 2006, 14 : 1544 - 1555
  • [10] Geochemical modelling of groundwater quality changes during Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) in the dual porosity Chalk aquifer, England
    Gaus, I
    Shand, P
    Gale, IN
    Eastwood, J
    WATER-ROCK INTERACTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 169 - 172