Multidisciplinary Design Optimization through process integration in the AEC industry: Strategies and challenges

被引:32
|
作者
Diaz, Hector [1 ]
Alarcon, Luis F. [1 ]
Mourgues, Claudio [1 ]
Garcia, Salvador [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Sch Civil Engn, Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
[2] Inst Tecnol & Estudios Super Monterrey, Sch Civil Engn, Campus Monterrey,Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Monterrey, Mexico
关键词
Building Information Modeling; Process Integration and Design Optimization; Multidisciplinary Design Optimization; Parametric Modeling; Component Interoperability; Architecture-Engineering-Construction; MDO requisites; ZERO-ENERGY BUILDINGS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; SIMULATION; FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTS; EXPLORATION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2016.09.007
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recently Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) has emerged in the Architecture-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry to assist designers in making the design process more efficient, by achieving more design alternatives in less time. Currently, MDO is developed with software tools that work together and automatically. However, the technical requisites to develop MDO using Process Integration and Design Optimization (PIDO) platforms are not clearly specified in the design optimization literature. There are many difficulties not covered by the literature: especially the tools' behavior, and the strategies to deal with PIDO. To determine the technical requirements, the tools' behavior, the challenges of interoperability and viable strategies, we reviewed the literature and tested five tools. This paper presents the main behavior of the tools we studied, and explains the challenges and strategies to develop MDO through PIDO. We observed three technical tool requisites: component interoperability, tool automation, and model parameterization capabilities. We detected low openness levels of the tool interfaces that did not always enable a full integration with PIDO or permit access to model properties. The scarcity of commands and the presence of pop-up menus impeded performing analyses automatically. Moreover, most of the tools did not allow parametric associations among components, compatibility among themselves or the addition of custom components. The strategies proposed focused on testing the tool interfaces, to validate that each computational process runs automatically, and to confirm that parametric relationships and components are possible: The tools tested were not specifically designed to include full capability to work with PIDO, therefore, enhancements would be needed to meet the three requisites: component interoperability, automation and parameterization. Technological, documentation and programming challenges also emerged when working with tools. We demonstrated that only certain tools can be used with a PIDO platform. However, there may be still other requisites for MDO using different methods that can become the focus of future work. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 119
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] System Integration: Functionality through Material, Process and Design
    Giese, Ulrich
    KGK-KAUTSCHUK GUMMI KUNSTSTOFFE, 2019, 72 (10): : 8 - 9
  • [42] Integrative chemical product design strategies: Reflecting industry trends and challenges
    Smith, Beverly V.
    Ierapepritou, Marianthi G.
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 34 (06) : 857 - 865
  • [43] Airfoil and wing design through hybrid optimization strategies
    Ctro. Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali, 81043 Capua, Italy
    AIAA J, 5 (634-641):
  • [44] Airfoil and wing design through hybrid optimization strategies
    Vicini, A
    Quagliarella, D
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1999, 37 (05) : 634 - 641
  • [45] PROCESS DESIGN THROUGH COLLEGE-INDUSTRY COOPERATION
    KLEI, HE
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 1969, 59 (09) : 1081 - &
  • [46] Design for Manufacturability through Design-Process Integration VII Introduction
    Mason, Mark E.
    Sturtevant, John L.
    DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURABILITY THROUGH DESIGN-PROCESS INTEGRATION VII, 2013, 8684
  • [47] Ontology-based semantic Integration for cooperative distributed multidisciplinary design optimization environments
    Wang, YD
    Shen, WM
    Ghenniwa, H
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN, VOL 2, 2004, : 173 - 178
  • [48] Process Integration and Design Optimization Ontologies for Next Generation Engineering
    D'Auria, Massimo
    D'Ippolito, Roberto
    ON THE MOVE TO MEANINGFUL INTERNET SYSTEMS: OTM 2013 WORKSHOPS, 2013, 8186 : 228 - 237
  • [49] An optimization approach to the integration of inherently safer design and process scheduling
    Al-Mutairi, Eid M.
    Suardin, Jaffee A.
    Mannan, M. Sam
    El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M.
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2008, 21 (05) : 543 - 549
  • [50] Industry 4.0 in Pathology Process Optimization through LEAN Management
    Roecken, C.
    PATHOLOGE, 2017, 38 (06): : 489 - 489