Multidisciplinary Design Optimization through process integration in the AEC industry: Strategies and challenges

被引:32
|
作者
Diaz, Hector [1 ]
Alarcon, Luis F. [1 ]
Mourgues, Claudio [1 ]
Garcia, Salvador [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Sch Civil Engn, Vicuna Mackenna 4860, Santiago, Chile
[2] Inst Tecnol & Estudios Super Monterrey, Sch Civil Engn, Campus Monterrey,Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Monterrey, Mexico
关键词
Building Information Modeling; Process Integration and Design Optimization; Multidisciplinary Design Optimization; Parametric Modeling; Component Interoperability; Architecture-Engineering-Construction; MDO requisites; ZERO-ENERGY BUILDINGS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; SIMULATION; FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTS; EXPLORATION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2016.09.007
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recently Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) has emerged in the Architecture-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry to assist designers in making the design process more efficient, by achieving more design alternatives in less time. Currently, MDO is developed with software tools that work together and automatically. However, the technical requisites to develop MDO using Process Integration and Design Optimization (PIDO) platforms are not clearly specified in the design optimization literature. There are many difficulties not covered by the literature: especially the tools' behavior, and the strategies to deal with PIDO. To determine the technical requirements, the tools' behavior, the challenges of interoperability and viable strategies, we reviewed the literature and tested five tools. This paper presents the main behavior of the tools we studied, and explains the challenges and strategies to develop MDO through PIDO. We observed three technical tool requisites: component interoperability, tool automation, and model parameterization capabilities. We detected low openness levels of the tool interfaces that did not always enable a full integration with PIDO or permit access to model properties. The scarcity of commands and the presence of pop-up menus impeded performing analyses automatically. Moreover, most of the tools did not allow parametric associations among components, compatibility among themselves or the addition of custom components. The strategies proposed focused on testing the tool interfaces, to validate that each computational process runs automatically, and to confirm that parametric relationships and components are possible: The tools tested were not specifically designed to include full capability to work with PIDO, therefore, enhancements would be needed to meet the three requisites: component interoperability, automation and parameterization. Technological, documentation and programming challenges also emerged when working with tools. We demonstrated that only certain tools can be used with a PIDO platform. However, there may be still other requisites for MDO using different methods that can become the focus of future work. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 119
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A resilience analysis approach for process design, integration and optimization
    Gong J.
    You F.
    Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2018, 70 : 1681 - 1686
  • [32] INTEGRATION OF STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION IN THE GENERAL DESIGN PROCESS FOR AIRCRAFT
    SENSBURG, O
    SCHWEIGER, J
    GODEL, H
    LOTZE, A
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1994, 31 (01): : 206 - 212
  • [33] Integration of structural optimization in the general design process for aircraft
    Sensburg, O.
    Schweiger, J.
    Goedel, H.
    Lotze, A.
    Journal of Aircraft, 1994, 31 (01): : 206 - 212
  • [34] Process Integration and Design Optimization technologies for modelling improvement
    Azzouzi, E-Mehdi
    Iuliano, Mariangela
    Hammadi, Moncef
    Plateaux, Regis
    Marchand, Francoise
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ISSE), 2016, : 179 - 183
  • [35] Multidisciplinary optimization framework for control-configuration integration in aircraft conceptual design
    Perez, Ruben E.
    Liu, Hugh H. T.
    Behdinan, Kamran
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2006, 43 (06): : 1937 - 1948
  • [36] Multidisciplinary optimization framework for control-configuration integration in aircraft conceptual design
    Perez, Ruben E.
    Liu, Hugh H. T.
    Behdinan, Kamran
    Journal of Aircraft, 1600, 43 (06): : 1937 - 1948
  • [37] A metamodel-based multidisciplinary design optimization process for automotive structures
    Ryberg, Ann-Britt
    Backryd, Rebecka Domeij
    Nilsson, Larsgunnar
    ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2015, 31 (04) : 711 - 728
  • [38] A metamodel-based multidisciplinary design optimization process for automotive structures
    Ann-Britt Ryberg
    Rebecka Domeij Bäckryd
    Larsgunnar Nilsson
    Engineering with Computers, 2015, 31 : 711 - 728
  • [39] Multidisciplinary design optimization of the diesel particulate filter in the composite regeneration process
    Zhang, Bin
    E, Jiaqiang
    Gong, Jinke
    Yuan, Wenhua
    Zuo, Wei
    Li, Yu
    Fu, Jun
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 181 : 14 - 28
  • [40] Multidisciplinary mission design optimization for space launch vehicles based on sequential design process
    Shu, Jung-Il
    Kim, Jin-Wook
    Lee, Jae-Woo
    Kim, Sangho
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2016, 230 (01) : 3 - 18