An Analytical Review of the Numerical Methods used for Finite Element Modeling of Traumatic Brain Injury

被引:60
|
作者
Giudice, J. Sebastian [1 ]
Zeng, Wei [1 ]
Wu, Taotao [1 ]
Alshareef, Ahmed [1 ]
Shedd, Daniel F. [1 ]
Panzer, Matthew B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Ctr Appl Biomech, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, 4040 Lewis & Clark Dr, Charlottesville, VA 22911 USA
关键词
Human body modeling; Mesh sensitivity; Mesh convergence; Hourglass formulation; Brain deformation; DIFFUSE AXONAL INJURY; MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL STRAIN; HEAD; RESPONSES; GENERATION; VALIDATION; STABILIZATION; DEFORMATION; STRETCH;
D O I
10.1007/s10439-018-02161-5
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Dozens of finite element models of the human brain have been developed for providing insight into the mechanical response of the brain during impact. Many models used in traumatic brain injury research are based on different computational techniques and approaches. In this study, a comprehensive review of the numerical methods implemented in 16 brain models was performed. Differences in element type, mesh size, element formulation, hourglass control, and solver were found. A parametric study using the SIMon FE brain model was performed to quantify the sensitivity of model outputs to differences in numerical implementation. Model outputs investigated in this study included nodal displacement (commonly used for validation) and maximum principal strain (commonly used for injury assessment), and these results were demonstrated using the loading characteristics of a reconstructed football concussion event. Order-of-magnitude differences in brain response were found when only changing the characteristics of the numerical method. Mesh type and mesh size had the largest effect on model response. These differences have important implications on the interpretation of results among different models simulating the same impacts, and of the results between model and in vitro experiments. Additionally, future studies need to better report the numerical methods used in the models.
引用
收藏
页码:1855 / 1872
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Embedded axonal fiber tracts improve finite element model predictions of traumatic brain injury
    Marzieh Hajiaghamemar
    Taotao Wu
    Matthew B. Panzer
    Susan S. Margulies
    Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2020, 19 : 1109 - 1130
  • [32] Correlation between Injury Pattern and Finite Element Analysis in Biomechanical Reconstructions of Traumatic Brain Injuries
    Fahlstedt, Madelen
    Depreitere, Bart
    Halldin, Peter
    Sloten, Jos Vander
    Kleiven, Svein
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 48 (07) : 1331 - 1335
  • [33] Application of Numerical Modeling and Finite Element Analysis in Fused Filament Fabrication: A Review
    Behseresht, Saeed
    Park, Young Ho
    Love, Allen
    Pastrana, Omar Alejandro Valdez
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (17)
  • [34] The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: A review
    Bruns, TJ
    Hauser, WA
    EPILEPSIA, 2003, 44 : 2 - 10
  • [35] Biomarkers in traumatic brain injury: a review
    Toman, Emma
    Harrisson, S.
    Belli, T.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ARMY MEDICAL CORPS, 2016, 162 (02) : 103 - 108
  • [36] Pharmacotherapy for traumatic brain injury: A review
    Raghupathi, R
    McIntosh, TK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FORTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN PHARMACOLOGY SOCIETY, 1998, 41 : 241 - 246
  • [37] Traumatic Brain Injury in Sports: A Review
    Sahler, Christopher S.
    Greenwald, Brian D.
    REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2012, 2012
  • [38] Military traumatic brain injury: A review
    Chapman, Julie C.
    Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2014, 10 (03) : S97 - S104
  • [39] Review of the Incidence of Traumatic Brain Injury
    Amirjamshidi, Abbas
    Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 44 (05) : 611 - 611
  • [40] Hypothermia for traumatic brain injury (Review)
    Lewis, Sharon R.
    Evans, David J. W.
    Butler, Andrew R.
    Schofield-Robinson, Oliver J.
    Alderson, Phil
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (09):