Mechanisms of drug-DNA recognition distinguished by Raman spectroscopy

被引:10
|
作者
Benevides, James M. [1 ]
Kawakami, Jessica [1 ]
Thomas, George J., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Biol Sci, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
关键词
DNA; ethidium bromide; proflavine; 9-aminoacridine; structure; recognition; Raman spectroscopy;
D O I
10.1002/jrs.2049
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
The highly chromophoric drugs, ethidium bromide (EtBr), 9-aminoacridine (9AA) and proflavine (PF) (3,6-diaminoacridine) bind to DNA by insertion of a polycyclic aromatic ring between adjacent base pairs of the double helix. Despite similar intercalative mechanisms, these drugs exhibit distinct DNA affinities and produce characteristic mutagenic effects. Complexes of the intercalants with small nucleotide fragments have been investigated by various methods, including X-ray crystallography. However, the structural impact of drug intercalation on a DNA molecule of genetic consequence has not yet been reported. Here, we employ near-infrared laser excitation (752 nm) and a DNA target of genomic size to obtain and compare Raman spectra of complexes of EtBr, 9AA and PF with DNA. Raman signatures of solution complexes have been analyzed by difference methods to reveal the specific structural changes induced at the drug/DNA intercalation sites. Perturbation of the DNA backbone geometry, as reflected in the Raman marker diagnostic of the phosphodiester group (800-880 cm(-1)), ranges from disruption of the B-form duplex in favor of either the A-form duplex, or separated strands, or a combination of altered DNA backbone geometries. The acridine intercalants, PF and 9AA, also perturb hydrogen-bonding interactions between the paired bases of duplex DNA, although in distinct ways. Conversely, base pairing is relatively unperturbed by ethidium intercalation. The results are discussed in relation to frameshift mutagenic activities of the intercalating drugs. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1627 / 1634
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Structural analysis of drug-DNA interactions
    Gilbert, Dara E.
    Feigon, Juli
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1991, 1 (03) : 439 - 445
  • [22] INVESTIGATIONS OF DRUG-DNA INTERACTIONS BY NMR
    WEMMER, DE
    PELTON, JG
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1988, 196 : 62 - MEDI
  • [23] NMR studies of drug-DNA complexes
    Keniry, MA
    Shafer, RH
    NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND NUCLEIC ACIDS, 1995, 261 : 575 - 604
  • [24] Analysis of drug-DNA binding data
    Qu, XG
    Chaires, JB
    NUMERICAL COMPUTER METHODS, PART C, 2000, 321 : 353 - 369
  • [25] Entropic binding mode preference in cooperative homo-dimeric drug-DNA recognition
    Rubinson, M. A.
    Parkinson, J. A.
    Evstigneev, M. P.
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 2015, 624 : 12 - 14
  • [26] Parsing free energies of drug-DNA interactions
    Haq, I
    Jenkins, TC
    Chowdhry, BZ
    Ren, JS
    Chaires, JB
    ENERGETICS OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, PT C, 2000, 323 : 373 - 405
  • [27] Molecular modeling of drug-DNA complexes: An update
    Trent, JO
    DRUG-NUCLEIC ACID INTERACTIONS, 2001, 340 : 290 - 326
  • [28] A thermodynamic signature for drug-DNA binding mode
    Chaires, Jonathan B.
    ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2006, 453 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [29] Metal-Based Drug-DNA Interactions
    Carlos Garcia-Ramos, Juan
    Galindo-Murillo, Rodrigo
    Cortes-Guzman, Fernando
    Ruiz-Azuara, Lena
    JOURNAL OF THE MEXICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 57 (03) : 245 - 259
  • [30] ELECTROCHEMICAL DNA SENSOR TECHNOLOGY FOR MONITORING OF DRUG-DNA INTERACTIONS
    Erdem, A.
    Karadeniz, H.
    Caliskan, A.
    Vaseashta, A.
    NANO, 2008, 3 (04) : 229 - 232