Comparison of three analytical methods for cocaine analysis of illicit powders

被引:10
|
作者
Campanella, L [1 ]
Colapicchioni, C [1 ]
Tomassetti, M [1 ]
Dezzi, S [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ROMA LA SAPIENZA,IST MED LEGALE,I-00161 ROME,ITALY
关键词
analysis; cocaine hydrochloride; free base; ISFET;
D O I
10.1016/S0731-7085(95)01758-5
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A new cocaine-sensitive ISFET device based on a cocaine-reineckate ion-pair complex dispersed in a PVC-sebacate matrix has been fabricated. This sensor displays a linear range for cocaine hydrochloride between about 3 x 10(-6) and 2 x 10(-2) M and a fast response (less than or equal to 25 s), which remains almost constant over the pH range 3-7. The sensor has been applied to the analysis of authentic illicit powders containing cocaine hydrochloride and other substances commonly associated with it, or of cocaine free base (crack). Experimental results were compared with those obtained employing two more common instrumental methods of analysis: gas chromatography (GC), and UV absorption spectrometry (the latter applied directly or based on second derivative absorption spectroscopy). Good agreement was found between results obtained by ISFET and GC methods, while UV absorption spectrophotometry proved suitable only in the case of pure cocaine hydrochloride and free base, or in samples also containing lidocaine, but using second derivative absorption spectroscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:1047 / 1054
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of different chemometric and analytical methods for the prediction of particle size distribution in pharmaceutical powders
    Mafalda C. Sarraguça
    Ana V. Cruz
    Helena R. Amaral
    Paulo C. Costa
    João A. Lopes
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2011, 399 : 2137 - 2147
  • [22] REVIEW OF ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR THE COMPARISON AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ILLICIT DRUGS
    SANGER, DG
    HUMPHREYS, IJ
    JOYCE, JR
    JOURNAL OF THE FORENSIC SCIENCE SOCIETY, 1979, 19 (01): : 65 - 71
  • [23] Comparison of illicit drug use in three selected towns in Slovakia by wastewater analysis
    Mackul'ak, Tomas
    Skubak, Jaroslav
    Grabic, Roman
    Drtil, Miloslav
    Bodik, Igor
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2015, 12 (07) : 519 - 524
  • [24] Comparison of Two Analytical Methods for the Analysis of Methylmercury in Fish
    Wang, Zhongwen
    Forsyth, Don
    Belisle, Stephane
    Beraldin, Franca
    Sparling, Melissa
    Trudelle, Renee-Anne
    Lapointe, Pascal
    Bellon-Gagnon, Pascale
    FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2013, 6 (01) : 157 - 163
  • [25] Comparison of Two Analytical Methods for the Analysis of Methylmercury in Fish
    Zhongwen Wang
    Don Forsyth
    Stephane Belisle
    Franca Beraldin
    Melissa Sparling
    Renee-Anne Trudelle
    Pascal Lapointe
    Pascale Bellon-Gagnon
    Food Analytical Methods, 2013, 6 : 157 - 163
  • [26] STEP LADDER FAILURE ANALYSIS, A COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL METHODS
    Kenner, Matthew T.
    Stevenson, Michael E.
    Knox, Erick H.
    Van Bree, Michael P.
    Wilkinson, John A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2011, VOL 9, 2012, : 397 - 405
  • [27] Volcanic glass under fire - a comparison of three complementary analytical methods
    Eder, Fabienne M.
    Neelmeijer, Christian
    Pearce, Nicholas J. G.
    Bichler, Max
    Sterba, Johannes H.
    Ntaflos, Theodoros
    Merchel, Silke
    X-RAY SPECTROMETRY, 2013, 42 (06) : 412 - 422
  • [28] Comparison of Three Analytical Methods for the Determination of Quinolones in Pig Muscle Samples
    Jimenez-Diaz, Inmaculada
    Pilar Hermo, Maria
    Ballesteros, Oscar
    Zafra-Gomez, Alberto
    Barron, Dolores
    Barbosa, Jose
    Navalon, Alberto
    CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2013, 76 (11-12) : 707 - 713
  • [29] GAS ANALYTICAL METHODS OF THERMAL-ANALYSIS IN COMPARISON
    KAISERSBERGER, E
    THERMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1979, 29 (02) : 215 - 220
  • [30] Comparison of three sampling and analytical methods for the determination of airborne hexavalent chromium
    Boiano, JM
    Wallace, ME
    Sieber, WK
    Groff, JH
    Wang, J
    Ashley, K
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2000, 2 (04): : 329 - 333