Multiobjective Optimization and Comparison of Nonsingleton Type-1 and Singleton Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems

被引:55
|
作者
Cara, Ana Belen [1 ]
Wagner, Christian [2 ]
Hagras, Hani [3 ]
Pomares, Hector [1 ]
Rojas, Ignacio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Comp Architecture & Comp Technol, CITIC UGR, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Comp Sci, Nottingham NG7 2TU, England
[3] Univ Essex, Dept Comp Sci, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Multiobjective optimization; nonsingleton fuzzy logic systems (FLSs); type-2 fuzzy logic systems; NEURAL-NETWORK; CROSSOVER OPERATOR; INFERENCE SYSTEMS; UNCERTAINTY; RULE; DESIGN; CONTROLLERS; ADAPTATION; ALGORITHMS; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2236096
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Singleton interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems (FLSs) have been widely applied in several real-world applications, where it was shown that the singleton interval type-2 FLSs outperform their singleton type-1 counterparts in applications with high uncertainty levels. However, one of the main criticisms of singleton interval type-2 FLSs is the fact that they outperform singleton type-1 FLSs solely based on their use of extra degrees of freedom (extra parameters) and that type-1 FLSs with a sufficiently large number of parameters may provide the same performance as interval type-2 FLSs. In addition, most works on type-2 FLSs only compare their results with singleton type-1 FLSs but fail to consider nonsingleton type-1 systems. In this paper, we aim to directly address and investigate this criticism. In order to do so, we will perform a comparative study between optimized singleton type-1, nonsingleton type-1, and singleton interval type-2 FLSs under the presence of noise. We will also present a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) for the optimization of singleton type-1, nonsingleton type-1, and singleton interval type-2 fuzzy systems for function approximation problems. The MOEA will aim to satisfy two objectives to maximize the accuracy of the FLS and minimize the number of rules in the FLS, thus improving its interpretability. Furthermore, we will present a methodology to obtain "optimal" consequents for the FLSs. Hence, this paper has two main contributions: First, it provides a common methodology to learn the three types of FLSs (i.e., singleton type-1, nonsingleton type-1, and singleton interval type-2 FLSs) from data samples. The second contribution is the creation of a common framework for the comparison of type-1 and type-2 FLSs that allows us to address the aforementioned criticism. We provide details of a series of experiments and include statistical analysis showing that the type-2 FLS is able to handle higher levels of noise than its nonsingleton and singleton type-1 counterparts.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 476
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contrasting Singleton Type-1 and Interval Type-2 Non-singleton Type-1 Fuzzy Logic Systems
    Aladi, Jabran Hussain
    Wagner, Christian
    Pourabdollah, Arnir
    Garibaldi, Jonathan M.
    [J]. 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2016, : 2043 - 2050
  • [2] On the Continuity of Type-1 and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems
    Wu, Dongrui
    Mendel, Jerry M.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2011, 19 (01) : 179 - 192
  • [3] A Quantitative Comparison of Interval Type-2 and Type-1 Fuzzy Logic Systems: First Results
    Mendel, Jerry M.
    [J]. 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2010), 2010,
  • [4] On Transitioning From Type-1 to Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems
    Aladi, Jabran Hussain
    Wagner, Christian
    Garibaldi, Jonathan M.
    Pourabdollah, Amir
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2015), 2015,
  • [5] Examining the Continuity of Type-1 and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems
    Wu, Dongrui
    Mendel, Jerry M.
    [J]. 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2010), 2010,
  • [6] On the robustness of Type-1 and Interval Type-2 fuzzy logic systems in modeling
    Biglarbegian, Mohammad
    Melek, William
    Mendel, Jerry
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2011, 181 (07) : 1325 - 1347
  • [7] Performance Comparison of Type-1 and Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems
    Naik, K. A.
    Gupta, C. P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTING AND CONTROL (ISPCC 2K17), 2017, : 72 - 76
  • [8] First-order interval type-1 non-singleton type-2 TSK fuzzy logic systems
    Mendez, Gerardo M.
    Leduc, Luis A.
    Hernandez, Maria de los Angeles
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2006, : 266 - +
  • [9] First-order interval type-1 non-singleton type-2 TSK fuzzy logic systems
    Mendez, Gerardo M.
    Adolfo Leduc, Luis
    [J]. MICAI 2006: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4293 : 81 - +
  • [10] A comparative study of type-1 fuzzy logic systems, interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems and generalized type-2 fuzzy logic systems in control problems
    Castillo, Oscar
    Amador-Angulo, Leticia
    Castro, Juan R.
    Garcia-Valdez, Mario
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 354 : 257 - 274