IMRT with Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Plan Evaluation and Treatment Outcome

被引:7
|
作者
Kim, Jun Won [1 ]
Cho, Jae Ho [1 ]
Keum, Ki Chang [1 ]
Kim, Joo Ho [1 ]
Kim, Gwi Eon [1 ]
Lee, Jong Young [2 ]
Kim, Soo Kon [3 ]
Lee, Chang Geol [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Yonsei Canc Ctr,Severance Hosp, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Wonju Christian Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kangwondo, South Korea
[3] Kangwon Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kangwondo, South Korea
关键词
nasopharyngeal cancer; IMRT; simultaneous integrated boost; concurrent chemotherapy; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMAS; RADIATION-THERAPY IMRT; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; CONCOMITANT BOOST; ACCELERATED FRACTIONATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; LARYNGEAL-CANCER; ADVANCED HEAD; NECK-CANCER;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hys169
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the outcome of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost and concurrent chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer. We analyzed 53 consecutive nasopharyngeal cancer patients who received definitive treatment using intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost and cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy. Forty-six patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation and seven patients with induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiation. The gross tumor (PTV70) received 69.96 Gy (2.12 Gy/fraction), high-risk subclinical disease (PTV60) received 59.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction) and low-risk subclinical disease (PTV56) received 56.1 Gy (1.7 Gy/fraction) in 33 fractions. Twenty-eight patients were treated with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy and 25 patients with helical tomotherapy. Dosimetric parameters were compared between the two modalities. The median treatment duration was 49 days (range: 4165 days). The complete response rate was 92.5. Three local, two regional, one locoregional and seven distant failures were observed. With the median follow-up of 41 months (range: 889 months), the 3- and 5-year local control, locoregional control, disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 91.8 and 91.8; 87.6 and 87.6; 77.5 and 70.5; and 86.4 and 82.1, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis, dermatitis, leucopenia and grade 4 leucopenia were observed in 10, 1, 2 and 1 patient, respectively. No grade 3 or higher xerostomia occurred. Helical tomotherapy significantly improved dosimetric parameters including the maximum dose, volume receiving 107 of the prescribed dose and uniformity index (D-5/D-95). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost with concurrent chemotherapy is a safe and effective treatment modality for nasopharyngeal cancer. Helical tomotherapy has a dosimetric advantage over step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy in a clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1152 / 1160
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dosimetric comparison of standard three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost schedule (sequential IMRT plan) with simultaneous integrated boost-IMRT (SIB IMRT) treatment plan in patients with localized carcinoma prostate
    Bansal, A.
    Kapoor, R.
    Singh, S. K.
    Kumar, N.
    Oinam, A. S.
    Sharma, S. C.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 28 (03) : 300 - 306
  • [42] Simultaneous Integrated Boost Bilateral breast cancer RT with Helical IMRT: How to manage it?
    Rodrigues, J. L. Soares
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S983 - S983
  • [43] long-term clinical outcomes of IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost for breast cancer
    Lee, H.
    Huang, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S713 - S713
  • [44] Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost IMRT in high risk prostate cancer - A novel approach
    Sashidharan, S.
    Beena, K.
    Chelakkot, P. G.
    Madhavan, R.
    Menon, D.
    Makuny, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S636 - S636
  • [45] PELVIC IMRT AND HYPOFRACTIONATED SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST TO HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Alessandro, Magli
    De Giorgi, Gioacchino
    Ceschia, Tino
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Marino, Marco
    Parisi, Giuseppe
    Signor, Marco
    Titone, Francesca
    Frea, Bruno
    Fongione, Sandro
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (05) : 1876 - 1877
  • [46] Dosimetric advantages of IMRT simultaneous integrated boost for high-risk prostate cancer
    Li, XA
    Wang, JZ
    Jursinic, PA
    Lawton, CA
    Wang, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (04): : 1251 - 1257
  • [47] Use of a simultaneous integrated Boost (SIB-IMRT) in the postoperative Irradiation of Prostate Cancer
    Gruhlich, E.
    Stroehle, S. P.
    Weick, S.
    Toussaint, A.
    Flentje, M.
    Polat, B.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2018, 194 : S92 - S92
  • [48] IMRT in the treatment of anal cancer: A dosimetric comparison of conventional 3D, IMRT, and IMRT with integrated boost
    Hsu, A.
    Hara, W.
    Pawlicki, T.
    Bazan, J.
    Koong, A.
    Goodman, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S674 - S674
  • [49] IMRT with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (IMRT-SIB) Radiotherapy and Concurrent Cisplatin for Locoregional Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
    Montejo, M. E.
    Bentz, B.
    Hunt, J.
    Tward, J.
    Shrieve, D. C.
    Hitchcock, Y. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S416 - S417
  • [50] CARBON ION BOOST AND IMRT: SEQUENTIAL VS. SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST
    Frese, M. C.
    Wilkens, J.
    Jensen, A.
    Oelfke, U.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S111 - S111